The owner bought 77 suites and wants to pretend to be a hotel. Can he change the use of the house at will?

The owner buys 77 suites and wants to pretend to be a hotel. In principle, he can't change the use of the house at will. A house is not a dual-purpose house. Therefore, if you want to change it privately, you need the consent of your neighbors in addition to submitting the plan to the relevant departments for approval. After all, I bought 77 houses, but the elevators, public land and so on are all owned by the owners. It is reported that this kind of residence wants to become a hotel, and I am afraid the relevant departments cannot approve it because the nature of the residence is there. If you want to open a hotel, you should choose a commercial building or a commercial and residential building.

This happened in Fangwanshu Dandi Community, Zhang Xiang Road, Changsha. It's amazing that an owner actually bought 77 houses in Building 2. This is definitely a top millionaire. After all, the housing price in Changsha is not low. The reason why the owners want to buy these 77 houses is to open a hotel. There is no precedent for opening a hotel in a residential area. Of course, there are many daily rents for residential buildings, and these daily rents also need to be filed. Many owners, especially neighbors, raised objections to the aboveboard intention to turn it into a foreign-related profit hotel. Neighbors' objections are clear. This is the residence. If it is changed into a hotel, it is bound to change the structure of the building when it is renovated.

Not only that, neighbors also think that after being converted into a hotel, people come and go, and everyone has it. For them, security is not guaranteed. After being converted into a hotel, a large number of foreigners have to park their cars, which will occupy public areas and be very unfavorable to their neighbors. Since home is a harbor, most people have to rest when they get home from work. If people come and go by the hotel, how can they rest?

Because of the fierce opposition of the owners, the property also intervened. At present, the hotel has stopped working, and the follow-up situation is still unknown. However, it is far-fetched to change the residence into a hotel, which is aboveboard and reasonable for the owner to stop it. I wonder if the owner who bought 77 houses still has the same idea?