Why is the live broadcast of water droplets closed?

What's the matter with the sudden closure of the live broadcast of water droplets? Why did the live broadcast of water droplets suddenly shut down?

? What's the matter with the sudden closure of the live broadcast of water droplets? Why did the live broadcast of water droplets suddenly shut down? After a week-long contest with Chen Feifei, a "92-year-old girl", the 360-drop live broadcast platform, which was questioned by the public, was announced to be permanently closed yesterday. The person in charge of the live water drop said that the live water drop itself is an innovative product that appears in response to the needs of users. In this process, some functions of the water drop live broadcast platform are controversial and may be used maliciously. Ask Zhou, the boss of 360, to apologize to her because she is not a black publicist.

event

360 announced the closure of the live broadcast of water droplets.

Yesterday morning, Water Drop Live announced that due to internal business adjustment, Water Drop Live will stop operating from now on. 360 smart cameras will focus on providing reliable safety monitoring functions and providing services to users. Subsequently, the 360 company's water drop live product team also published an open letter "Reflections on the Water Drop Live Product Manager".

In the letter, the person in charge of the water drop live broadcast said: "Live broadcast and security monitoring are completely different on the 360 smart cameras. Most users of cameras are used for monitoring. Users who do live broadcasts need to go through several complicated processes to release live broadcasts. Of course, we put these two functions on the same hardware, which is easy to mislead everyone. This is what we need to reflect on. " The person in charge admitted: "It can be said that our users' customers are live broadcasts, and we are lucky, or we lack thinking. When these users' live broadcasts disturb their customers, although these customers are not our direct users, we should really pay attention to and consider their feelings. This is the social responsibility of water drop live broadcast. We didn't do this well. We must admit this mistake and hope to correct it. "

But at the same time, the person in charge also pointed out: "Some people are hacking us, but we can't refute it, so we should seriously reflect on what went wrong."

In response to the problem of public live broadcast without consent, the team said in response to comments from netizens that for public live broadcast, we must admit this mistake and hope to correct it by closing the live broadcast platform. However, many third parties mistakenly guide every 360 camera to broadcast live in public places, which makes people mistakenly think that as long as it is a 360 camera, it will broadcast live online, which is easy to cause public misunderstanding. "We decided that from today, 360 smart cameras will delete all live broadcast related functions and only provide security monitoring functions. The water drop live broadcast platform is also completely closed and no live broadcast service is provided. " The person in charge said in the letter.

However, regarding the monitoring service of kindergartens, 360 said that it will unswervingly continue to provide 360 smart cameras to kindergartens nationwide for free, which will help parents to know their children's dynamics in real time. In addition, 360 smart cameras will upgrade and optimize the use scenarios of kindergartens.

reaction

"92 girls" want to apologize this week.

Yesterday, after 360 announced that it would permanently shut down the live broadcast of water droplets, Chen Feifei responded with support, thinking that 360 could be aware of the problems of its products. Monitoring means monitoring, and live broadcast means live broadcast. It is not allowed to do any commercial activities in the gray area of monitoring and live broadcast. However, she also said: "From the reflection of the product manager of water drop live broadcast, the content of the article is not sincere enough. It is not difficult to find that they still want to say that my article was manipulated and hacked on purpose. They should prove that I am a black publicist. If I can't find evidence, 360 and Zhou also need to apologize to me personally for my malicious slander. "

In an interview with the media in 65438+February 65438+June, he publicly stated that he was not the black public relations that Zhou said. In her view, Zhou should realize his own problems. An enterprise with such a large scale should have the overall situation and learn to talk about the matter, instead of taking the problem personally when it goes wrong, and at the same time have certain safety supervision behavior on its own products.

sound

Live streaming of water droplets involves privacy issues.

It is understood that the water drop live broadcast is a user sharing platform based on 360 smart cameras Water Drop. In other words, only users who have purchased 360 small water drop cameras can broadcast live. Users who don't buy water droplets can also download the 360 camera APP through their mobile phones or log in to official website to watch other people's live broadcasts. Because the live broadcast of water droplets focuses on the monitoring function, many users have monitoring requirements when purchasing. According to the official website of live water droplets, most users who use live water droplets directly play the surveillance video.

In this regard, some legal persons pointed out that the live broadcast of water droplets allows the recorded person to appear in the live content without knowing it, which actually involves privacy issues. According to Article 36 of the Tort Liability Law, Internet users and Internet service providers who use the Internet to infringe upon the civil rights and interests of others shall bear tort liability. If a network user uses the network service to commit infringement, the infringed party has the right to notify the network service provider to take necessary measures such as deleting, shielding and disconnecting the link. If the network service provider fails to take necessary measures in time after receiving the notice, it shall be jointly and severally liable with the network users for the enlarged part of the damage.

The above-mentioned legal person believes that the live content provider is a direct infringer and should bear civil liability and can directly file a lawsuit against him. If the direct infringer cannot be determined, the network service provider can be sued.