Is it legal to set minimum consumption in restaurants and other consumer places?

Core Tip: The act of setting the minimum consumption without authorization in hotels and other places belongs to the overlord clause infringement, which not only violates the principle of good faith, but also violates the relevant provisions of the law, and belongs to the act of compulsory consumption. The editor of the legal express will introduce you. 1. Article 9 of the Consumer Protection Law stipulates that consumers have the right to choose their own goods or services. Decide whether to buy any kind of goods, accept or not accept any kind of services. This means that consumers have the right to choose how much to spend. The hotel's act of setting the minimum consumption without authorization belongs to the overlord clause infringement, which not only violates the principle of good faith, but also violates the relevant provisions of the law, and belongs to the act of compulsory consumption. Since the hotel's practice of setting a minimum consumption limit is an illegal act of depriving consumers of fair choice, it is invalid whether Mr. Liu agrees or not, because it violates the law. In this regard, consumers can choose to complain to the consumer association or the price management department, or they can choose to bring a lawsuit to the court. 2. Can restaurants restrict consumers from bringing their own drinks? It is a typical violation of the overlord clause that restaurants refuse consumers to bring their own drinks. The Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests clearly stipulates that consumers have the right to choose their own goods or services, to compare, identify and choose, and to decide whether to buy or not to buy any kind of goods or to accept or not to accept any kind of services. Hotels restrict consumers from bringing their own drinks, which infringes on consumers' right to choose.