How to treat the online evaluation of scenic spots and hotels?

As for the evaluation of hotels and scenic spots on the Internet, I think my personal subjective views are serious and not objective enough, but those objective ones are too official, so don't take them too seriously, for reference only.

Let's talk about scenic spots Some encyclopedias have pictures and comments. I don't usually watch this because it's too official. Most of the photos taken are beautified and not very close to reality. Moreover, some netizens' messages and comments are actually quite true, but it is difficult to see the real comments you want, because some people in the same place will like it and some people don't, which is normal. At this time, I will read the comments with pictures, of course, just for reference. After all, some people may say that they don't like it because they don't know how to appreciate the essence of that place. I will look at the comments on various websites and make a comprehensive analysis.

And hotels, hotel reviews are even more difficult to distinguish. For example, I saw a homestay before, and the reviews were good and the photos were clean, but after I went there, I found it was particularly humid and didn't fall asleep all night. The hotel owner said to give me a set of nail clippers for me to review. I think that's how all the previous comments came from. Maybe it's my bad luck to check in when the weather is wet. Therefore, the subjectivity of hotel reviews is too serious, which will involve some interest temptations and be even more inaccurate.

So I generally don't believe all the comments about scenic spots and hotels on the Internet, just as a reference to understand the environment. Different people will have different feelings about the same thing, so generally speaking, judging by comments only depends on luck and character. Being in a good mood is not too bad.