What is the highlight of the TV series The Bottom Line?

Obviously, The Bottom Line is a proper main melody drama, and it is precisely because it is a main melody drama that some things are afraid to shoot, perhaps for fear of leaving a bad impression on the audience. It is understandable to present the best side to the audience, but the biggest failure of this drama is that the protagonist of the judge is too strong and completely divorced from reality.

Jin Dong plays the role of the president of the filing court of a grass-roots court. He has so much time to mediate cases and can do anything. In fact, in many cases, pre-litigation mediation is adopted at the beginning of filing. Mediators are basically responsible for pre-litigation mediation, and mediators are mostly veteran comrades who are not legal professionals and retreat to the second line. In this procedure, judges rarely do not directly participate in mediation, especially in the filing court.

As far as the previous episodes are concerned, every judge in the play is so dedicated, responsible and kind, full of love and justice, and the key is communication. This image-building is perfect. However, as a lawyer for many years, I may be unlucky and have never met such a perfect judge. The play intends to concentrate all its advantages on several important characters in the play. Although a tall judge image has been established, it is far from reality, which I think is the biggest in the whole play.

The drama also presents many real cases in reality, which are typical and are the highlights. However, as mentioned above, the drama is intended to highlight the functions and glorious image of judges, so it is too skipping and simplistic in the specific presentation, relevant context and how to try classic cases, and many details are not deeply interpreted, which is regrettable. I think it may be limited by the space and the overall plot direction, so I can't be too detailed.

I think another major failure of this drama is to belittle the profession of lawyers by interpreting individual bad phenomena in the legal profession. Although this situation does exist in reality, it doesn't mean that you can't play such a bad lawyer. It's just that the portrayal in the play is too one-sided and the good image of the lawyer has not been correctly displayed. On the one hand, it will make judges tall and highlight the powerful role of judges in the trial of cases, on the other hand, it will show bad lawyers without giving them an objective and positive image, which is easy to form a sharp contrast.

The handling of some cases, especially classic cases, requires the extensive participation of all parties, lawyers, or public security, procuratorial, media and even other personnel. The judge is only one of the roles, a link, and no link will be suspected that the old lady is selling melons. This drama highlights the role of the judge too much, which, in my opinion, is very one-sided and has very clear intentions.

Anyway, most of the current TV dramas are divorced from reality, detached from reality, only talking about positive images, only talking about everyone's happiness, lacking the courage to face hardships and problems, and the bad phenomena and values of grassroots society. How can you understand the dilemma if you dare not face the problem directly? How to really solve the problem?

So my feeling is that this is just a sweet pet idol drama that shapes the positive image of the judges and praises them from the perspective of the judges. Of course, the play is not without its merits. A good judge can not only establish judicial authority, but also play an effective role in case justice, promoting the rule of law and resolving disputes. This play has a positive guiding role in the career of judges, and many classic cases in the play will be encountered in real life. By watching this drama, we can learn some basic legal knowledge and countermeasures, which is beneficial for us to solve disputes.