What did Hu Rui specifically respond to the hornet's nest?

Hu Rui responded to this hornet's nest. What did he specifically respond to?

At 3 o'clock this morning, Shenzhen Hu Rui Data Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Hu Rui Data) issued an official statement on the prosecution of horse cellular data fraud. In the statement, Hu Rui's data team said that a large number of suspicious behaviors have been recorded, screened and notarized by the judiciary, and some information about the fraudulent accounts taken over by the insiders of Ma Honeycomb has been mastered. All the analysis contents and links to comment on the missing account are included in its official website. In addition, the Hu Rui data also mentioned that the hornet's nest incident was purely a stopgap measure, not targeting any individual or enterprise.

The following is the original statement:

10 year 10 20th, an article entitled "Valuation 175 billion tourism unicorn is a ghost town composed of zombies and water army? The article "Screen on the Internet".

The article points out that among the 2. 1 100 million "true reviews" claimed by online travel platform Ma Honeycomb, there are 654.38+0.8 billion pieces of data copied by robots from competitors such as reviews and Ctrip, and claims that plagiarism can only be regarded as a "well-written word", and 7,454 plagiarism accounts have been found, with a total of 5.72 million food reviews./kloc-

10 2 1 this morning, the second article, hornet's nest, began to destroy evidence, but this level is really hahahahahahahahahaha. The author mentioned that the authenticity of the main sections "Travel Notes" and "Q&A" of Mahoneycomb's UGC content was also questioned. The report extracted 1.6 million travel notes, and found 2 1 most frequently quoted words from the comments, such as "Is there a detailed introduction" (reply 3238 times) and "I haven't finished updating, wait for the landlord to update" (reply 3234 times); At the same time, by capturing nearly 6.5438+0.58 million travel notes of more than 490,000 users, it is found that 7% of them are suspected to be marketing travel notes, and the average number of times they are topped is 36.4% of ordinary travel notes.

At present, the cumulative reading volume of the two articles has exceeded 6.5438+0.5 million.

In this regard,101On the morning of October 22nd, Ma Honeycomb officially issued a statement. According to the statement, the content of Mawei website comments only accounts for 2.9 1% of the total data, and the number of accounts suspected of false comments accounts for a very small proportion of the total accounts. On the hornet's nest, the core data is the travel guide, accounting for 78.95438+0%, and most of the travel guides are created by users themselves. Therefore, media articles are misleading. 654381On the evening of October 22nd, Sohu Technology learned that Beijing Mawei Network Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Mawei") sued Shenzhen Hu Rui Data Co., Ltd. and Ding Ziquan for reputational infringement.

Subsequently, in the article "I admit, we attacked the hornet's nest in an organized way" published by the two authors on the official account of WeChat on the night of June 22nd,10, he claimed that the statement of hornet's nest had stolen the concept, avoided the reality, and casually tossed the pot, and demanded that the "verified" hornet's nest organized attack be published, otherwise it would be regarded as slander and a counterclaim would be initiated. In addition, the author also said that he expected the court to make a fair ruling, because "this case will ultimately determine the Internet trend of China in the next 20 years".

In this lawsuit and response, I don't know who is right or wrong between the two companies, waiting for the final result.