How can you tell if you have been brainwashed?

How can you tell if you have been brainwashed?

How to tell if you are brainwashed? The following is what I have carefully arranged for you. How can I tell if you are brainwashed?

Our network is a melting pot, and it is noisy every day.

No matter how small things are, there will be countless people coming from all directions and shouting at each other enthusiastically. Drinking soybean milk can separate the sweet party from the salty party, while eating jiaozi will lead to more factions. If bigger events are involved, more people will participate in the debate and the views will become more intense.

There is a distinctive feature in our quarrel? Almost all the bickering parties think that they are absolutely right, and almost all of them are bitterly cursing each other for not thinking independently and blaming each other for being brainwashed.

Things get interesting when both sides accuse each other of being brainwashed.

At this time, we need to master a kind of ability? How to identify the correctness of an opinion?

In short, how can we know which side is right? What is the standard to prove which side's view is not perfect?

This topic is very interesting. Let's play a happy game first.

Let's start with the one that made a sensation on the Internet recently, shall we?

Said, a friend, honest, life in general, recently attended a classmate party, surprised to find that those rotten people, all made a fortune, many students have become local tyrants.

Local tyrants are local tyrants. This honest friend may be a little frustrated. He drank too much at the party and passed out.

When he woke up, he was horrified to find himself naked and sleeping in a gorgeous hotel room. An aunt is leaning down, looking down at him with a strange smile and gently saying to him: Are you awake? There is 1000 yuan by the bed, which is for you. I have something to do. Why don't you go?

No. Who are you? Before the confused friend asked questions, the gentle aunt had already left.

He dressed in horror and fled the hotel. When he got home, he sent a WeChat to ask the local tyrants: What did you do to me? Why am I in that mysterious hotel? Who's that aunt? Why is she in my room? What did she do to me?

? Now, please evaluate this matter.

One more question.

Said, an aunt, sleeping at night, heard a loud sound of walking in the corridor, which lasted all night, obviously someone in the corridor, kept walking around. But when the aunt put her eyes close to the cat's eye on the door, she saw that the outside was bright and the corridor was empty.

I can't see anyone.

But the footsteps continued.

Bang, bang, bang?

Invisible Nightcrawler only has clear footsteps.

This strange thing kept my aunt from sleeping all night.

It's dawn before aunt dares to push the door out. Just as the young man next door came back from the outside, the aunt hurriedly asked him: Young man, did you hear it last night? Someone was walking in the corridor all night, but no one was seen. Did you hear the terrible footsteps?

Scary footsteps? The young man next door looked strange and shook his head slowly. No, I didn't hear footsteps.

What the hell is going on here?

? Now, please also evaluate this matter.

I don't know how you evaluate the above two events.

Now, let's add some details and reevaluate:

The first thing, after an honest friend got drunk, local tyrants sent him back, but he didn't know where his home was. I opened a room for him in an upscale hotel, worried about his situation. A local tyrant classmate asked his nanny aunt to take care of him. In addition, I was worried that he might use money after waking up, so I put 1000 yuan next to his pillow.

So, when he woke up, he was horrified to find himself sleeping in a hotel. There is an aunt in her fifties in the room. 1000 yuan?

The second thing, the guy next door, although burly, is timid and afraid of the dark. Last night, the boy came back from the outside and found that he didn't bring his house key and his wife went back to her parents' house. So the young man decided to save some money and sleep in the corridor outside the door for one night. But the light in the corridor is voice-activated, and it will go out after a while. When the light went out, the young man was afraid, so he beat the ground with his sole.

Then, the aunt next door heard footsteps in the corridor outside at night: bang, bang, bang? Can you get close to the cat's eye on the door, but you can't see the figure

Then, after dawn, the aunt told the young man outside. Why didn't the young man make it clear?

Because the young man didn't dare to speak out, it was very troublesome for the aunt to complain about the property in a rage. So, in order to save his heart, he pretended to be innocent and kept shaking his head: terrible footsteps? I don't know. Did you hear that?

? When these details are completed, what conclusions do we have?

The conclusion is that when we don't know enough facts, we can't comment.

But when we don't know what happened, but we think we do, then the argument breaks out.

Almost all opinions are based on facts, which leads to judgment.

In the case of insufficient facts, it is impossible to judge, or the judgment is one-sided.

We are not God, are we not clouds overlooking the whole life? Even if it is, we may not be interested in finding out what everyone is thinking.

The world is not a flat-screen TV, and what we care about is not a straight line in front of us. The social problems we discuss are often incomplete and full of black boxes.

Simply put, any event often consists of the following four parts:

First, what you don't understand.

Second, what the parties described, but there is no circumstantial evidence.

The third part, the narrative of the parties, has circumstantial evidence.

Fourth, the narrator's point of view.

Shall we hold a chestnut? The nearest one? The alumni event of the National People's Congress.

The incident of the alumni of the National People's Congress, the initial news, listed a lot of words and the views were very clear. But by our standards, the whole incident is a big black box. We all know both ends of the black box. He was alive when he went out. A few hours later, his family answered the phone of the police station and rushed to the hospital. He's dead.

Next, the police declared that the deceased was a prostitute. In this way, things have evolved into three links.

Next, there is circumstantial evidence that the deceased had called for help in an emergency in a community before his death, and was chased by several casual men and finally brought a car.

At this time, the whole process has formed four links.

At this point, the event still cannot be evaluated because the most important black box has not been opened.

The public is waiting to open the black box. However, the police first claimed that the law enforcement recorder was broken by the deceased, and then changed their minds and did not bring the law enforcement recorder, but used a mobile phone to record. The mobile phone was broken by the deceased? In other words, the black box of events can't be opened.

Since then, the network theory has been developed around this black box that can't be opened.

If the black box can't be opened, why fight?

Just study the views of all parties? What is controversial is not the incident at all.

But imagination!

Back to the two examples we gave at the beginning, when the black box was not opened, our view was just imagination.

? An honest brother woke up drunk and found himself in a hotel room next to a gentle aunt with a stack of RMB on his pillow. At this time, his feelings or comments are all imagination.

? The aunt in the next room was disturbed by the footsteps in the corridor outside the door all night, but there was no one on the cat's eye. My aunt's heart almost collapsed that night. All the possibilities that menstruation thought of were imaginary.

The same is true of the rote memorization of alumni of the National People's Congress.

This is true of almost all events in human society.

Only in this case can we judge whether a viewpoint is correct.

When we are right, we are not talking about opinions.

But a serious and responsible attitude.

This attitude, first of all, admits that there are things that you don't understand, admits the existence of the black box of events, only waits for the black box, only questions, but has no ability to evaluate.

This expression is the most objective.

But it is also the weakest voice, because it is too calm and has no passion.

Passionate, always imaginative, after changing the black box.

At this time, it is easy for us to evaluate the judges from all aspects.

It is easy to know which side of the dispute has been brainwashed.

When a person makes an impassioned comment, his language system must be composed of three parts:

Part I: Facts.

Part II: Imagination of uncertain things.

Part III: Views.

The facts are indirect and characterized by detailed details, but no opinions can be drawn.

But imagination is different.

Imagination is subjective and emotional, which will lead to countless opinions.

? It is never a fact, but a disapproval of the imagination of the other party.

The imagination of all parties is only each other's subjective cognition of the world.

Now, we have mastered the ability to judge the parties to a dispute more accurately, distinguish between good and bad, decide between men and women, and judge the outcome, thus bringing our thinking closer to the highest value.

? Only circumstantial facts are mentioned in the comments, and there is no imaginary unopened black box. This view has the highest value and the highest knowledge content.

? In view of the facts, we also imagine the unopened black box, which is the normal state of life. If imagination is partial, it can even be called rationality.

? The fact content is insufficient, but the imagination content is mostly. The quality of such views is the least reliable, but it is the most striking. This area is the most lively, but the value is the lowest. In the Internet age, this field has even become a means for many friends to become famous. If you want to be red, you will have a nonsense based entirely on imagination. At this time, the people can't help but rush to cut you, and you get angry.

Whether it is the death of an alumnus of the National People's Congress or any event before or after, the so-called heated debate is always the third category. People who like to be lively are comfortable here every day, but they are always confused? In the imaginary world of all kinds of people, how can we not be confused?

Step out of the world imagined by others and you will wake up.

In this world, if there are games and competition. Then, what we strive for is nothing more than the cognition of self-imagination.

A smart person can recognize his own imagination and know the imagination of others. So you like to ramble when something happens? It's not that he likes talking nonsense, but if I tell you that many of your words are full of imagination, you won't agree. Therefore, in order to avoid provoking you and making you angry, smart people will slap him to death like a mosquito, and most of the time they will smile at you and give you a distant expansion goal with a pity. I hope you can solve these problems through practical life.

Mature people, unable to get rid of their own imagination, have a commanding perspective and see through others' imagination at a glance. So these people are often very calm and don't like to say much? What's the point of talking too much and not listening? A mature person is always a prick, and the immaturity of others is always his opportunity. This is really unfair to an immature person.

But there is no way to be wronged. Immature people often get dizzy with excitement because their imagination is out of step with others'. Immature people mostly do less things and complain more, unless they give themselves a goal in life and a career in life, and then they will find out: Damn it, that thing is a sauce purple drop? At this time, they no longer like to talk and began to wait.

The last sentence of the famous novel "The Count of Sister Hill" says: All human wisdom is contained in four words: waiting and hope.

Wait for what?

When more of us realize that there is a difference between imagination and fact, and are trained in thinking about the similarities and differences between facts and opinions, then hope will come true.

Let's wait quietly in silence. Waiting for the richness and maturity of self-wisdom, waiting for our society to gradually move towards normal.

All this is not far away, after all, we have already started.

;