What should I do if someone swipes his card at the hotel in the middle of the night?

Legal analysis: if the evidence submitted by the hotel cannot prove that its bathroom facilities meet the national and industrial safety standards, it cannot prove that the hotel has fulfilled its safety guarantee obligations within a reasonable limit. Therefore, hotels are at fault in fulfilling their security obligations and need to bear corresponding responsibilities.

Legal basis: The supplementary liability of the security obligor stipulated in Article 6 of the Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases occurs when the third party intervenes in the tort. The direct liability of the infringer and the supplementary liability of the obligor are neither joint liability nor joint liability, so the theory of causality cannot be applied to determine their respective share of liability. In the case of no fault of the security obligor, the obligor cannot be ordered to bear the liability for compensation; If the security obligor is at fault, the infringer shall bear the direct liability for compensation first, and the security obligor shall bear the supplementary liability for compensation within the scope of its fault; After assuming the liability for compensation, the security obligor may claim compensation from the infringer. In the specific treatment, if the infringer is not clear, the security obligor can be directly listed as the defendant; If the infringer is clear, it can be confirmed that the infringer and the security obligor are * * * co-defendants. If the infringer and the security obligor are co-defendants, when the infringer is ordered to bear the liability for compensation, the specific scope or amount of the security obligor's supplementary liability for compensation shall also be stated in the judgment document, and the security obligor shall have the right of recourse.