Thailand people advocated the abolition of the king system regardless of the risk of breaking the law. What did the king do?

The fundamental reason why Thai people advocate the abolition of the king system is that the king did not comfort the people well during special periods, but ignored the people, which led to some psychological resistance among the people.

Many people may be very familiar with and understand Thailand when it comes to it, because in many cases Thailand’s tourism industry has developed very well. It can be said that tourism accounts for most of Thailand’s income.

So for some people in Thailand, they also hope to obtain richer resources and a wealthy life. After all, Thailand is also a not-so-rich country and is also in a positive stage of development.

Thailand implements the king system, which has a deeper meaning.

As a product of today’s times, the special title of king actually plays a big role in many cases, because it represents the people’s aspirations and is also a person who can lead the way to prosperity. special status.

And most countries today have gradually abolished the title of king. However, for Thailand, it still implements the king system, so the king's power is the highest symbol and control.

Real power From this point of view, we can actually see that Thailand is still in a monarchy and feudal system. This is also caused by the imperfection of some local market economies and civilization construction.

After all, Thailand’s geographical advantages and climatic conditions also put Thailand in a relatively weak state. In many cases, we also need to rely on other industries to support each other. Many families live in very poverty.

So in a country like this, what did the king do wrong that made the people of Thailand want to abolish the king system? During this special period, the king did not do a good job of appeasing the people.

Judging from some situations in ancient China, those who win the hearts and minds of the people win the world, so it is very important for a good country to have a good leader, not only to strengthen the overall domestic strength, but also to We need to improve people's consumption levels so that they can live a well-off life.

However, during the sudden epidemic, the King of Thailand was on an inspection abroad at the time, so he never returned to his country to preside over the overall situation, nor did he take any measures to facilitate the people.

This has also aroused dissatisfaction among many people. They feel that if such a thing happens, no one in their country can protect the people well, so what is the use of this king? Therefore, under the premise of this contradiction, the people collectively advocated the abolition of the king system.

However, according to some Thai legislative provisions, people are not allowed to verbally insult members of the Thai royal family. If you violate this provision, you will face 15 years in prison.

So many people dare to be angry and dare not speak out, burying this resentment in their hearts. However, in the past, we have been able to understand that this state of affairs will bring many disadvantages.

However, during the epidemic. These people actually took to the streets to demonstrate at the risk of breaking the law, declaring that they wanted to abolish the king's system. When this incident happened.

The local police also came forward to stop it, but it did not play a very good role. Apart from forcible suppression, there were no substantive measures to appease the people. Therefore, I believe that the Thai people will take this issue seriously in the future. It will definitely happen many times in life.

For the king of Thailand, this is also the biggest crisis he has faced. The consequences it brings are even more severe than a sudden epidemic.

So "those who win the hearts and minds of the people win the world." From this point of view, China has done much better in comparison. At least in the psychology of the people, they can feel the greatness and prosperity of the motherland. Being able to feel the peace of mind that the motherland brings to oneself requires the strong power of the country to support it. Conclusion.

Looking at Thailand, in fact, at that time, the king may not have done any particularly extreme behavior, but doing nothing was actually the most incompetent manifestation.

At least in the face of special times, the State Grid Corporation of China should take action personally, instead of hiding aside and enjoying its own life, regardless of the lives of its own people. This is the fundamental reason for the outbreak of this behavior.

And Thailand itself is lacking in terms of military, medical, and transportation, and this is a factor that needs to be considered by the king.

Strengthen the comprehensive national strength through the improvement of military power, solve the people's worries about the consequences by improving the medical system and technical level, and change the people's lives and needs through the construction of transportation.

Only in this way can a country develop benignly, thereby making people's lives more nourishing. It would not be such a behavior that the king would be deposed at a critical moment.