Recent current affairs and comments .. two articles ... better be short ... hurry up! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

① After the hodgepodge and Sanlu milk powder in 2008, negative food incidents broke out, and an article began to circulate on the Internet: China is entering an era of mutual poisoning. Five years later, the question now may be, how can we get out of this era of mutual poison?

How many things about poison happened in the past week? "Shennongdan" poisoned Shandong Weifang ginger; Shanghai fake mutton; Mineral water standard; There are also groundwater and river pollution that have long been commonplace. Accompanied by this, no official in the regulatory department, which takes the taxpayer's money and undertakes the heavy responsibility of public food safety, has taken responsibility so far.

Let's take a look at some related news in the past week. This year, the environmental protection department of Wuhan filed a case to investigate and deal with 60 illegal sewage discharge enterprises, with a penalty amount of 6.5438+0.95 million yuan. Shandong 14 enterprise was fined 350,000 yuan for underground sewage discharge. 88 enterprises in North China are involved in groundwater pollution, with a total amount of 610.3 million yuan. To sum up, the average fine of each polluting enterprise is less than 50 thousand. I believe that no matter how positive you look, you can't see "punishment". This is more like a symbolic spanking of children by parents in China, even though these children are guilty of poisoning.

The poisoning case of Fudan graduate students once again made Zhu Lingan and Tsinghua a hot topic. Although it was not timely, the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau publicly responded after all. Although a little sad, it must be admitted that this is an improvement. This is not the first time that Zhu Lingan has caused a heated discussion on the Internet. In the past, similar cases were invisible. In response to this response, netizens have new dissatisfaction and doubts, and they also expect the Beijing police to give more detailed explanations and information. China ruled by law needs benign interaction inside and outside the system. Before major sensitive cases happen, an open, transparent and timely response is the best opportunity to rebuild people's trust in the rule of law.

According to official reports, the dust has settled on the incident of "Anhui young women falling to their deaths". Beijing police ruled out the possibility of poisoning, sexual assault and homicide by means of on-site investigation, corpse inspection and combing videos. The family members expressed no objection to this. The suspect who had previously spread rumors on the Internet has also been arrested. Some commentators believe that netizens should reflect on why they believe rumors easily, and some netizens believe that the public has the right to question and express doubts. Where is the boundary between suspicion and rumor? Where is the power limit of the government to judge rumors and punish criminal suspects? Why do people distrust the government and take to the streets to "make trouble"? Why do netizens not believe in rumors and always "believe in rumors"?

These are old questions, and we may not be able to give correct answers, but what is certain is that there is a poison in our social mechanism, which hinders the mutual trust of this society, punishes evil and promotes good, and has a virtuous circle. No matter what kind of dream you pursue, you should first get rid of this "poison" because it is related to the basic bottom line of a society. Without these, even the best dream will become a balloon without it. The higher you fly, the more dangerous you are.

② The poisoning cases of graduate students in Zhu Lingan and Fudan made Zhu Lingan, Tsinghua University, which had been silent for a long time, become a hot topic again. During the period of 1994, Zhu Ling, a female student in the Department of Chemistry in Tsinghua University, suffered from a strange disease, which proved to be a rare thallium poisoning, leading to paralysis. The police had locked the murderer in Zhu Ling's "side", but in the end the case went away. In the past 20 years, various speculations and legends about "who is the murderer" have never stopped.

There is no reason to convince the public that there is any inherent entanglement in an ordinary criminal poisoning case, and it is too late to lift the veil. Xinhua News Agency's "Seven Questions" are nothing more than people's doubts about Zhu Lingan's simultaneous voice: 19 What is the reason for the unresolved situation in Zhu Lingan? What evidence did the police have at that time? Where is the case card? Was it true that the police had "only one layer of paper left" and which suspect did it point to? Why did you prevaricate and not tell Zhu Ling's family about their inquiry or even their information disclosure application? What does the mysterious so-called "other circumstances in which laws, regulations and relevant regulations are not disclosed" mean? In particular, the public questioned whether the case was improperly "interfered" by power.

All voices are noisy, fair and humiliating.

The latest Global Times editorial put forward a viewpoint: "Zhu Lingan: Public opinion needs to be calm and the government should respond". My understanding should focus on the government: on the one hand, public opinion shows rare rationality in Zhu Lingan. Although there are all kinds of speculations and rumors, they basically follow logical deduction or provide a version of public opinion to the judicial department. No violence beyond the procedure, no personal attacks. This concern itself is the progress of the rule of law, because Pound said, "People's indifference to rights and trials is a bad sign for the law." People pay more attention to Zhu Lingan and focus on positive energy, which in itself is the trust and promotion of law and the rule of law. There is neither the problem of "calmness" nor the problem of calmness, and it is not a bad thing.

On the other hand, what really needs to be questioned is the ambiguous attitude of the relevant departments in Zhu Lingan. The longer the affair of ambiguous vagrancy is, the more obvious the four kinds of harm it brings: First, the harm to the truth of right and wrong. No matter who the murderer is, the terrible poisoning has broken through the bottom line of interpersonal relationship, so don't ask, don't investigate? It is a ruthless injury to social order and ethics; Second, the damage to the party Zhu Ling and his family, the flowers in the flower season withered due to poisoning, and the life dignity, health rights and interests and family fate involved are unimaginable grief for others; The third is the harm to the so-called relevant "suspects". With the rumors spread by public opinion, various versions that may be contrary to the truth have delineated many famous citizens with surnames. The right to privacy is "human flesh" and the moral cross may not be in the same direction as the court; Fourth, damage the judicial credibility. Cases that have initiated judicial proceedings have not been resolved for a long time. Will legal belief and judicial justice not be shrouded in darkness in Zhu Lingan?

Will it take another year (19) for Zhu Ling and his family to see the dawn of justice? Are Zhu Ling's parents still waiting for the result?

Everything is the same old saying: Zhu Lingan, only the truth can reassure people!

③ Food safety: Is our life safety getting lower and lower, or is the position of an official getting more and more expensive? Is the public becoming more and more powerful, or is society becoming more and more indifferent and numb?

The recent turmoil in the field of food safety, the "Shennongdan" poisoned ginger incident in Weifang, Shandong Province, the fake mutton incident in Shanghai where untested meat such as fox meat and mouse meat was passed off as mutton, and the standard and quality problems of bottled water and bottled water that are still entangled, Chinese people's confidence in food safety and table safety once again fell to a low point. Contact the events exposed in recent years, such as gutter oil, clenbuterol, antibiotic chicken raising, Sudan red, toxic kelp, white wine plasticizer, leather milk, etc. As the netizen teased: "China on the tip of the tongue is in full bloom."

In the face of public indignation, the relevant departments responded quickly, and within a few days, the results of the handling of the fake mutton incident were announced. The leaders attached great importance to it, and the regulatory authorities conducted a thorough investigation day and night. It turned out that a few unscrupulous traders were unscrupulous, so they arrested profiteers, sealed up black shops and closed down for rectification, which succeeded. This is probably the basic routine to deal with most food safety problems. However, we can't help asking, since we have such a quick and efficient response ability, where is the daily supervision? Is it really all the responsibility of a few small vendors and vendors? Who is really in charge?

The public must remember the melamine incident a few years ago. In that incident, many officials, including the deputy secretary of Shijiazhuang Municipal Committee and the mayor, were dismissed. It is almost the first time that the whole people pay attention to food safety. The local government showed its strength and determination to deal with the incident and gave the public an account. However, with the emergence of various problems such as food and environmental protection, such determination and strength are becoming more and more rare. For example, the Lankao fire that killed seven people last year only dealt with a few civil affairs bureau cadres. No wonder Xinhua commented: "In the face of surging public opinion, Lankao finally responded, and six' officials younger than sesame' such as the county civil affairs bureau were suspended for inspection, but how can this result be worth seven lives?"

Is our life safety getting lower and lower, or is the position of an official getting more and more expensive? Is the public becoming more and more powerful, or is society becoming more and more indifferent and numb? Who is to blame for all this now? Is it really necessary to kill one or two people, so that the "company" feels that something is wrong, and it is a routine to make a small apology and withdraw a small official?

In the face of food safety incidents encountered by the people, can our officials start from a kind heart, take care of each other, get up the courage and hand in their resignation letters? We need to encourage this kind of courage of officials.

④ Xiangyang fire (earlier): Xiangyang fire, 14 people died. CCTV only broadcasts Boston.

14 On the morning of April 4th, a fire broke out in city garden hotel, a scene of Qianjin East Road, fancheng district, Xiangyang, Hubei Province, killing 14 people and injuring 47 others. The youngest victim was only five years old.

The fire started in the Internet cafe on the first floor and soon spread to the upstairs. From the pictures taken, we can see that the smoke is rolling and the fire on the first floor is burning. When the fire broke out, a man who escaped from the window and stood above the window fell from the fourth floor because of exhaustion. There were also a group of people waiting for rescue outside the window on the second floor. This disaster, known as "purgatory on earth", was not reported by the media for the first time, comforted by leaders for the second time, and a terrorist attack occurred in Boston for the third time. Almost all the media paid attention to Boston, and no one paid attention to the fate of this group of compatriots who should have been concerned.

The crying netizen wrote in the Weibo: "When Guangshan (Henan) chopped 22 primary school students, CCTV criticized the shooting of American primary school students; When bird flu occurred in China, CCTV was broadcasting the Amazon tide live; When an Internet cafe fire broke out in Xiangyang, more than 60 people died. The headlines of our website were all about the terrorist attacks in Boston ... I don't say anything. Let's light a candle for the deceased. 〞

Lin Ping, Japan: At 2: 50 am Beijing time today, an explosion occurred in Boston, causing 3 deaths 144 injuries. Flags were flown at half-mast at the U.S. Capitol. The media in China, far away from the other side of the ocean, reported the explosion with a large topic. The day before yesterday, we had a fire in Xiangyang, 14, and 47 people were killed. The victims were at least 5 years old. Has disappeared from the TV station. China media, please report them more. On the scale of life, everyone's weight is equal.

Independence begins with traveling alone: last year's school shooting and yesterday's Boston bombing, the White House and the President were the first to stand up and fly flags at half mast. However, on the other side of the globe, similar events can only be seen online, and may disappear in an instant. The first thing I see is always "the family of the deceased is currently emotionally stable." The moon in America is no rounder than anywhere else. We don't want to compare and we don't need to compare. The dignity of life transcends nationality.