The largest unfinished building in Guangzhou has been unfinished for 20 years. Do you think the owners can successfully defend their rights?

1996 Australian villa is located in Huangpu district, east of Guangzhou, with convenient transportation, mountains and rivers, reservoirs and parks. It can be said that the environment is good. Later, they used? 38,000 yuan down payment, interest-free installment? Our advertisement attracted many people to buy a house. However, in 2000, the financial director of Australia and the United States absconded with money, so that the capital chain broke, which led to the Australian villa becoming an unfinished building, and nearly 2,000 families entered a desperate situation. Later, in March 20 13, it was handled? Unfinished residential building? In order to solve people's livelihood problems, the Guangzhou team decided to demolish and rebuild unqualified houses and cooperate with new developers to solve the funding problem. But later, in order to gain greater benefits, the partners took away the transfer money of the owner's resettlement land by some means, which led to the delay in the construction of the property, and the owner's hopes were dashed. Later, the land of Australian and American companies has been transferred, so the owners of Australian villas began a difficult rights protection for nearly 20 years. The house in the villa has also become obsolete in this long wait, and the weeds outside the house are overgrown and very desolate. However, in 20 19, Fangxing Company, as a creditor, directly requested the court to bankrupt the Australian-American company and wanted to get the remaining land of the Australian-American company. Fortunately, it was not handled because of insufficient evidence. The legal representative of Australia and the United States also said that he had written to the banking regulatory bureau, but someone behind the banking regulatory bureau made their company's capital chain break from 200 1 to now. Therefore, the misfortune of nearly 2000 owners stems from the struggle between developers, and the 20-year rights protection lasted for a generation, which also led to the house becoming a dangerous building. If the follow-up departments concerned investigate the cause of this matter after intervention, the housing construction in this area will be reasonably rectified. Owners still hope to succeed in safeguarding rights. However, the house is in disrepair for a long time and will face the risk of demolition. I only hope that the country can give a reasonable solution and let the owners have a comfort.