If I only want to see the sea during my four-day holiday, which is more cost-effective, Boracay or Koh Samui, Thailand? Can you tell me the specific reason?

Boracay and Koh Samui are more cost-effective than Boracay's four-day holiday.

There are two main reasons.

Prices in Boracay are much cheaper than those in Koh Samui. Most of the guests in Koh Samui come from Europe and America, and all kinds of activities and hotel charges meet the standards of developed countries, while most of the guests in Boracay come from China and South Korea, and all kinds of activities and hotel charges are basically known for their cheapness. When the accommodation, eating, drinking and having fun in the two islands are similar, the price in Long Beach is much cheaper.

Looking at the sea, the seascape of Long Beach is far better than Koh Samui.

The quality of water sports such as snorkeling in Long Beach is also higher than that in Koh Samui. The main disadvantage of Long Beach is that there is only one high-end hotel, Shangri-La, and the tourist density is too high. If you want a better experience, you can consider staying in Shangri-La or hotels in WC and nami Bay. S 1.2.3 are all floating clouds.

Su Mei's words are not dispensable, but according to you, four days to see the sea is cost-effective, and two islands are incomparable:)

If you have any questions, I'll add them.