The security guard of a hotel in Zhejiang refused to take the elevator to save someone. What adverse effects will sometimes come from sticking to the old rules?

In this case, a security guard at a hotel in Zhejiang refused to allow 120 people to take the elevator. In my opinion, this is not simply sticking to the rules, but directly ignoring the dignity of our lives. So this matter has attracted great attention from many netizens so far. Everyone was talking about this matter and believed that security should bear a very important responsibility during this time. So today, let’s discuss with you the adverse effects of sticking to a rut.

First, what happened at that time.

At that time, a customer of the hotel felt that his body was not his friend and called 120. Then 120 rushed to the scene, but when they went upstairs, they were refused by the security guard and refused to let them take the elevator. The reason for the rejection was very simple, that is, the 120 people were not residents of the hotel, so they were not allowed to enter the hotel. During this period, he did not receive any message instructing it to allow 120 to enter, so the two parties put it on hold.

Second, the follow-up security explanation.

Although in the next incident, the security guard said that he did not know that 120 went in to save people at the time, but I think anyone with common sense in life knows that since 120 rushed to the scene, he must have It won't happen without reason. And during the negotiation process between the two parties at that time, they had made it clear that they entered the hotel to save people. So it's obvious that the security guard is telling lies here, and the reason why he insists on sticking to the rules is very simple. It is because of the hotel's regulations. If an unrelated person enters the hotel, his money will be deducted.

Third, how do you view this matter?

As many netizens said on the Internet, at such a critical moment, it is obvious that the security guard's approach is incorrect. But at the same time, although I know what he did is incorrect, I still hope everyone can understand his approach. After all, when the company formulated its rules and regulations, it did not expect such a thing to happen. And their management obviously failed to act in this matter.