After the kitchen caught fire and the firemen put out the fire, the property demanded compensation for 600 tons of water. Is this reasonable?

It is unreasonable for the property to claim 600 tons of water after the fire fighters put out the kitchen fire. One cubic meter of water equals one ton of water, and 600 tons of water is 600 cubic meters of water. If you live in a three-meter building on the first floor, you can put a 200-square-meter house. Not only does the kitchen need 600 tons of water, but even if the whole building is on fire, you can only lend 25 tons of water to the fire truck. The large one will cost 18 tons, and 600 tons of water is 30 cars. A large fire truck will run out of water only when 30 carts drive downstairs and spray water together. Another algorithm is to spray water, the minimum of which should not be less than five liters. It takes 36 tons of water to water a fire in a residential area for one hour, and it takes 16 to put it out once. So it is unreasonable to use 600 tons of water in our kitchen fire.

We need to make sure that we should compensate for the water used in the residential area, because according to the property law, the facilities in the residential area belong to the property of the owner, so according to the fire protection law, after the accident, the person who caught fire should bear the responsibility, and we should ask the property for proof of 600 tons of water. If the property uses fire water to water the flowers, it may happen. You have to prove that 600 tons of water is not from your kitchen. Generally speaking, the fire brigade will consider the loss of water after putting out the fire, and will not put 600 tons of water when the kitchen is on fire. This is simply unreasonable. If your family has 20 bottles and a half tons of water, and firefighters wear advanced equipment, half a ton of water is completely enough. Moreover, the medium-sized fire truck with six tons of water is paid by the state, not by us who are on fire.

The water that the community receives should be our money, but it doesn't need 600 tons of water. In this way, the property fee paid when using water is also related to money. For example, if a thief enters the community and the property security guard is injured by the thief, the cost of the security guard should be borne by the stolen person. Therefore, if the owner does not violate the rules and cause a fire, it should be compensated by the property. You can come up with relevant compensation records and follow suit. If it is stipulated by the community to pay compensation, you can pay compensation, because the water compensated is not empty talk from the property, but also needs to be based, so we have to ask him to show proof of 600 tons of water, that's all.