Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Hotel franchise - Is the hotel liable for the scratches caused by parking?

Is the hotel liable for the scratches caused by parking?

Hotel parking is zoned and you need to bear the liability for compensation. The parties parked in the hotel parking lot and formed a custody contract relationship with the hotel. The vehicle was scratched by other vehicles during storage, and there was a certain fault. The hotel should be responsible for compensation. As a paid custodian, the hotel should have the obligation to take good care of the vehicle. If the vehicle is damaged in the hotel parking lot, the hotel shall bear the corresponding liability for compensation.

The solution of vehicle parking being scratched;

1, shaved in the free parking lot. Free parking will only compensate for intentional or particularly serious car damage, and there is no compensation for minor injuries. In this case, you should call the insurance company. But you still have to pay 30% of the maintenance fee because you can't find the perpetrator. If you have additional risks of car damage insurance, but you can't find the special risks of a third party, the insurance company will compensate you in full in this case;

2, the community was smashed, directly looking for property. Parking in the community is the most convenient and safest way to go home or visit relatives and friends. But for the open-air parking lot in the community, it is quite common to encounter other cars entering and leaving. At this time, if the parties cannot be found, the owners should consult with the property company first. Because the parking fee charged by the property company is not necessarily the vehicle management fee, but the occupation fee;

3. The best way is to stop the car correctly to avoid the trouble caused by scratching the car.

Legal basis: Article 897 of the Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC).

During the storage period, if the deposit is damaged or lost due to improper storage by the custodian, the custodian shall be liable for compensation. However, if the unpaid custodian proves that he has no intention or gross negligence, he shall not be liable for compensation.