Regardless of the budget, is it necessary to stay in the highest-end hotel or homestay when traveling alone?

Regardless of the budget, I don't think it is necessary to be the highest-end hotel or homestay when traveling alone.

First of all, before choosing a hotel, you should ask yourself what your needs are. For example, some people's main needs are convenient transportation, relatively new security facilities, or all clean and comfortable, with windows and good sound insulation, so some people will choose a national chain subway or a newly opened hotel when choosing a hotel. If you want to know the quality of the hotel, you can also look at the comments and pictures of previous guests. From the picture, we can know the spatial layout and sanitary conditions of this hotel. If most of the scores are above 4.6, it is more real data. As for breakfast and service, for some people, if they want to play early, they can basically forget it. If you add services, at most, you can provide good services after you check in. Then, the service can be basically ignored.

Secondly, because you are traveling, you should spend your money on more valuable things, because every time we punch in at a scenic spot, we will be attracted by the food or other things here, so having fun will definitely cost more than staying. Plus one or two hundred hotels outside can basically meet your daily needs, so there is no need to waste money on it in order to experience the service of high-end hotels.

Finally, for many people, the most important thing in traveling is to have fun and live safely, but these hotels in some places can meet your needs, and there is no need to stay in high-end hotels or homestays. This is because the most important thing in traveling is to play, not to enjoy high-end hotels. If I were you, I wouldn't choose to stay in an expensive hotel.