Why do many people say Sanya is not as good as Thailand?

It's not that Sanya is inferior to Thailand. Depends on which dimension you compare.

Compared with tourism, Sanya's tourism industry is not equal to Thailand. But I want to emphasize that if I have to choose one of these two places to travel, I will choose Thailand.

In other words, in terms of the cost performance and value of the event, I would think that the cost performance of Thailand is much higher.

Why do you say that?

First of all, the ticket to Sanya is similar to that to Bangkok.

Secondly, prices in Thailand are slightly lower. Most importantly, the price of accommodation by the sea is much lower than that in Sanya. Especially recently, I feel that only local tyrants can go to Sanya to play. But going to Thailand is really cost-effective.

In terms of scenery, Phuket and Chiang Mai in Thailand are much better than Yalong Bay in Sanya, with better water quality, amusement facilities and comprehensive aspects.

Secondly, many places in downtown Sanya feel like a big country, which can't be compared with Bangkok.

The most unacceptable thing is that tickets for scenic spots in Sanya are really too expensive. Cheapest ticket 120, scenic spot shuttle bus 30. A buddy and I went to Thailand first, and then to Sanya. Going to Thailand, two people staying in a five-star hotel, eating well, costs thousands of dollars. I went to Sanya, stayed for four days, and directly spent tens of thousands.

Therefore, there is a saying that Sanya is inferior to Thailand, but it must be admitted that Sanya is only a city and Thailand is a country, so there is no comparability in comparison.

In a word, if I choose a place for a holiday from the perspective of tourism, I will choose Thailand. Above.