The classic defense of agreeing to divorce

Friendship, like marriage, depends on avoiding unforgivable things. The following is the classic defense that I have compiled for you to agree to divorce. I hope it will help you. Welcome to read it for reference only.

The classic defense of divorce consent 1 Respondent: _ _ _ _ _, male, born on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Tel:139 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Respondent: _ _ _ _ _ _, female, born on _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

In the case of the plaintiff _ _ _ _ v. my divorce dispute, the defendant replied as follows:

First, the defendant agreed to the plaintiff's divorce request.

1. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant lied to her by hiding her marriage history before marriage, which is not true.

2. From marriage to March 2007, the plaintiff lived with me at school, and she never came home during the National Day holiday in 2006. This matter can be proved by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

3. In March 2007, the plaintiff left home for no reason, and I also left my job to visit relatives and friends everywhere. The plaintiff spent two months looking for Pingliang City. At this time, the plaintiff already had the idea of divorce, so the plaintiff's family unreasonably asked me to write down a promise not to beat and scold. They thought I wouldn't write to achieve their divorce, but I was old and had no children, so I had to obey.

What is more hateful is that the plaintiff abandoned her 5-month-old breast-feeding biological flesh and blood in April 2008, and then the defendant and her 68-year-old father repeatedly urged her to leave home. Since then, the poor little life has eaten poisonous milk powder that is harmful to people. (Later eat Beinmei)

It is fraudulent for the plaintiff to marry me and collect the property. The facts are as follows:

When the plaintiff married me, her family didn't even give the plaintiff a penny of property, only an old sewing machine 18 years ago.

(2) It is understandable that the plaintiff and I visited his son born to his ex-wife many times after marriage, and I also actively supported it. But what is puzzling is that just after the summer vacation in 2006, the plaintiff went to his parents' home for no reason. The next day, I found her parents, who lied that they had never seen her, so I rushed to Zhao's home in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ village, Jingchuan County. As a result, the plaintiff and her ex-husband had a family dinner and washed a lot of clothes.

(3) In September of the same year, the plaintiff, his family and relatives went to his ex-husband's house to celebrate his son's birthday (at that time, I also prepared clothes and school supplies for the plaintiff).

(4) As mentioned in the previous "1.3", I was forced to write down the "No Beating and Cursing Guarantee" in an attempt to make me return in vain.

The plaintiff's ex-husband also came to offer condolences on the first anniversary of the plaintiff's father's death.

To sum up, the plaintiff is greedy for money, obsessed with money, and wants to borrow money again. Obviously, it is hopeless for me to try my best to maintain it, so I agree to dissolve the marriage.

2. The son is raised by the defendant.

1. The leaflets of the respondents have been handed down for six generations, and they have passed the legal age of marriage and childbearing and have no other children.

The plaintiff is 36 years old, young and promising, and still at the legal age of marriage and childbearing.

The plaintiff is suspicious, short-tempered, moody and heartless, and can abandon his own flesh and blood of 5 months old, which shows his cruelty.

The plaintiff abandoned his own flesh and blood for five years, without making a phone call, taking a dress or buying a toy, but it was only a birthday. Q: What about missing? What about love? What about feelings? What about raising?

As mentioned above, the plaintiff's attitude and feelings towards his two biological sons are completely different. Respondents should ask: What does this phenomenon mean?

To sum up, it is natural for the plaintiff to raise my son!

Three. The cause of the defendant's debt

1. My family borrowed it in the 1970s. 130 (with 5 IOUs attached).

2. My family made a loan to 500 yuan in 1980s (attached with 13 repayment slip).

In 1990s, my family borrowed RMB 3,765,438+00 (with 23 IOUs attached).

4. The loan to 600 yuan in 2002 was paid off on June 8, 2008, with the total principal and interest of 934.49 yuan (three IOUs attached).

5. In March 2003, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ said that riding a motorcycle broke a child's leg. In order to save people from fire and water, I mortgaged my salary to give him a loan of 654.38+00000 yuan, but he cheated money and fled. Borrow money everywhere, and pay it off with a salary increase in April 2004. Total principal and interest 10523.04 yuan (including _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

6. When the plaintiff married me, I not only didn't have any savings, but also borrowed a small amount of money, so I could only borrow money from relatives and friends to pay off the bride price of 20,000 yuan. Later, because my relatives and friends urged me, I had no choice but to borrow 8000 yuan in March 2007. In order to get rid of the interest, I scraped together and paid off the loan on June 5438+ 10, 2008, with the total principal and interest of 83,765,438 yuan +0.00 yuan.

7. When the plaintiff married me, she had suffered from the third degree erosion of the uterus. From March 2006 to February 65438+,the plaintiff continued to take medicine and infusion regularly, and recovered completely at the end of the year. She became pregnant in 2007 1 month (as evidenced by the plaintiff).

8. The defendant's son was admitted to _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ People's Hospital (in 2008 1 month)

9. The defendant's son _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, from April 20, 2008 to March 20, 2008, the milk powder was not broken for four years (attached with 1 photo 20 15: 46: 44, taken by mobile phone on May 2, 2065).

10. The respondent's son _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 20 12, from March to May, often had high fever and unbearable stomachache, and was treated in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ After investigation, the diagnosis was suppurative tonsillitis. Because I was going to have tonsillectomy, I found that my son had congenital heart disease when I checked my heart function (two inspection reports and diagnosis certificates were attached).

1 1. The defendant's parents are old. More unfortunately, on 20 10, 10, my only sister committed suicide by taking poison because she couldn't stand her husband's destruction. It was like a bolt from the blue. How can this weak old man bear such a heavy blow? There is no doubt that the situation is worse. So far, she has been ill and has never stopped taking medicine. In addition, because I was unable to pay tens of thousands of yuan for the operation, my mother's curable disease was put on hold (attached with 4 inspection reports and diagnosis certificates).

12. My home was built on 1985. This is a civil building, which was seriously damaged by insects. At present, it has become a serious dangerous building, and it has not been repaired due to insufficient funds (it can be seen at a glance).

13. The defendant does not deny that he has been married four times. Excuse me, how can I get a wife without paying?

14. The respondent suffered from severe hemorrhoids, but she endured the pain because she could not afford the expensive treatment fee, which has been put on hold so far (the plaintiff has evidence).

To sum up, the respondents' families are not rich and have no other sources of income. Especially in recent years, the contradiction between the old, the weak, the sick and the disabled is very prominent. At present, a debt of 50,000 yuan has been formed. It is not easy for me to maintain such a broken family on my meager salary without incurring too much debt. Where did the plaintiff say there was a deposit of 6.5438+0.2 million? For such a family, people with a little brains will think that it is normal to have debts; It is not normal to have a deposit.

Four. Property, debt and alimony of husband and wife.

1. The defendant and the plaintiff jointly bear the debt of 50,000 yuan (30,000 yuan for Li and 20,000 yuan for Zhang).

The plaintiff is young and energetic, which is a good time to work. In recent years, women's jobs have high salaries.

There are many kinds of jobs, and jobs are easy to find. The worst job salary also reached more than 2000 yuan. The plaintiff has been away from home for five years, and the minimum annual calculation is 6,543,800 yuan, and now she has at least 50,000 yuan in deposit. The defendant asked for an equal distribution.

3. The respondent believes that, based on the reasons mentioned in Article 2 above, the plaintiff has the responsibility to be more able to bear the child support, and the specific amount is expected to be decided by the court according to the relevant laws and regulations.

4. The son of the defendant and the plaintiff plans to have a cardiac coronary artery fistula ligation at the age of 8 and a tonsillectomy at the age of 10. More importantly, the plaintiff has an unshirkable responsibility for the cause of my son's congenital heart disease. It is natural and obligatory for the plaintiff to bear part of the medical expenses. The specific amount is expected to be decided by the court in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.

5. Plaintiff made much ado about nothing, deliberately created family conflicts, which led to the breakdown of the relationship between husband and wife, left the respondent and his young son in dire straits, abandoned me, and caused great harm to the respondent, especially the young children, resulting in extremely difficult and painful life in the future. The respondent requests certain mental compensation, and the specific amount is expected to be decided by the court according to relevant laws and regulations.

6. The litigation costs should be borne by the plaintiff alone (reason: why divorce? )。

The above defense opinions are kindly accepted by the court.

I am here to convey

April 30, 20__

The classic defense of agreeing to divorce Article 2 Defender: _ _ _ _ _ _, female,195165438+1October 29th, Han nationality, unemployed, living in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

Authorized Agent: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Because of the case of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ v. my divorce dispute, I hereby reply and request as follows:

I. Agree to _ _ _ _ _ _ _ divorce;

2. Request the plaintiff to pay the defendant the expenses with an area of 93.5㎡ located in _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

The purchase price is 654.38+ten thousand yuan.

Three, husband and wife * * * property division according to law.

1. Plaintiff _ _ _ _ _ ran away from home on February 20 10, and has not paid any money to his family so far.

So far, it's been 18 months, and the plaintiff's pension of 20 10 is 2840 yuan, which should be 5 1 120 yuan for the couple's property. I ask for half (calculation method: 20 10: 2840). 20 1 1 year: 2840 _ _ 6 =17040; The plaintiff receives the pension every year 13 months. (34080+ 17040)÷2=25560 yuan)

2. One of the top ten diseases: it is China's birthday, and the beneficiary is me. 1999.

Since September 2008, the annual premium is 1 100 yuan, * *:111=12.

3. Zhang, the daughter of the plaintiff, is a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The women's office borrowed 30,000 yuan and 22,000 yuan, totaling 52,000 yuan, demanding repayment of 26,000 yuan.

The defendant never thought that the plaintiff would divorce him and never considered that he was old.

Source of livelihood, the plaintiff now demands divorce from the defendant, which leads to the defendant's living difficulties without financial resources, and requests the court to decide that the plaintiff should pay the defendant _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Five, the litigation costs in this case shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The above defense opinions are requested to be adopted by our court.

I am here to convey

_ _ _ _ _ People's Court

Respondents:

June 20th ____ 10

The classic defense of agreeing to divorce Article 3 Defendant:

Address:

Respondents:

Address:

The plaintiff _ _ _ _ _ _ _ sued the respondent for divorce, and the case number was _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

Facts and reasons:

1. The relationship between the Respondent and the Plaintiff _ _ _ _ has indeed broken down, and there is no possibility of reconciliation. The Respondent agrees to dissolve the marriage relationship with the Plaintiff _ _ _ _ _.

(1) Although the respondent and _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ got married voluntarily, their personalities were incompatible after marriage, and * * * failed to understand and help each other during their common life, resulting in increasingly weak feelings between husband and wife and conflicts. Now the plaintiff insists on divorce and the defendant agrees.

(2) In the complaint, the plaintiff claimed that the respondent "abandoned his wife and children" was irresponsible to the family, and the fact that he "abused", "beat, hurt" and "had an affair with others" was inconsistent with the actual situation.

In fact, the respondent has been suffering from mental disorder since _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ At the same time, due to the frequent business trips of the respondent and the lack of communication between the two parties, the plaintiff became more suspicious and imposed various restrictions on the respondent. Therefore, the facts stated by the plaintiff are inconsistent with the actual situation.

Second, this _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ refers to

In this case, the plaintiff claimed that her future income was unstable and she could not support her children. Considering that the plaintiff can't live with his children due to work reasons, and the respondent has a fixed income and a stable job at present, and the respondent's parents are willing to help raise their children, the court is requested to order the legitimate children to be raised by the respondent.

Three, if the court ruled that the child was raised by the plaintiff, then the defendant can bear the monthly maintenance fee of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ yuan until the child reaches adulthood, and the maintenance fee of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ yuan advocated by the plaintiff is too high, which exceeds the defendant's financial capacity. The reason for this is the following：

(1) The child is still young and has been living with the plaintiff's parents in _ _ _ _ _ _ _. Judging from the local actual living standard, the monthly child support fee of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ yuan is obviously too high, which is also inconsistent with the actual expenditure of the child at present. The child support fee is the obligation of both parties, and the plaintiff should not push all the support obligations to the defendant.

(2) At present, the respondent doesn't have much financial ability to pay the maintenance of his son.

Starting from _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The plaintiff claims that the property owned before marriage belongs to the plaintiff, and should not recover the house payment from him, which has no legal basis.

The property involved in this case was purchased by the respondent in his name before marriage with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ As the capital contribution of the respondent accounts for the main part of the property at the time of purchase, and the interior decoration expenses of the property are borne by the respondent, the property of * * * will be divided when the relationship with * * * is terminated.

5. All the furniture and household appliances in the house involved are owned by the respondent.

All the furniture and household appliances in the house involved in this case were purchased by the respondent before marriage, and the property should belong to the respondent's personal property before marriage. According to the relevant provisions of the law, the property should belong to the personal property of the respondent. Therefore, the court is requested to order the property to be owned by the respondent.

The above defense opinions are requested to be adopted by our court.

I am here to convey

_ _ _ _ _ People's Court

Defendant: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Attachment: copy of the defense; _ _ _ _ _ copies of evidence materials.

Classic defense of agreeing to divorce Article 4 Respondent: Li Moumou, male, born on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

Respondent: Yao Moumou, female, born on.

The respondent made the following reply to the case of the respondent v. my divorce dispute:

First, the relationship between the appellee and the appellee is good, and there is no emotional breakdown as claimed in the complaint.

(1) The respondent and the respondent are in free love and have emotional foundation;

The respondent said in the complaint: I married the defendant through free love registration on _ _ _ _ _ _ _19. This statement is in line with the actual situation. It is precisely because the respondents and the respondents have similar personalities and hobbies that they have formed a family together and have experienced ups and downs for more than ten years. Until now, the respondent still loves the respondent deeply. The respondent filed a divorce lawsuit, which surprised the respondent deeply.

(2) The Respondent and the Respondent live together and always live in harmony.

The respondent believes that it is not true that the plaintiff mentioned in the complaint that the husband and wife often quarrel, and the quarrel is not without it, but it does not affect the relationship between husband and wife. The respondent said in the complaint that the respondent's work was not in place, which was inconsistent with the actual situation. For the sake of family and children, respondents have been working hard in Beijing Digital City E-commerce Center. He works hard and never complains. How can he say that the defendant didn't do his job well?

(3) It is irresponsible for the family to claim that the respondent is looking for a woman outside, which is not in line with the actual situation.

It may be due to the lack of communication between the respondent and the respondent, which led the respondent to suspect that the respondent had another woman outside, and thus filed a divorce lawsuit. Respondents are willing to communicate with respondents, be considerate and understand each other, and eliminate misunderstandings between them.

2. The respondent implores the people's court to comprehensively consider the facts of the case, and make a judgment that the respondent and the respondent are not allowed to divorce.

(1) The current situation of the relationship between the defendant and the defendant is that although there are minor contradictions, it is a normal quarrel between husband and wife, which is far from the complete breakdown of the relationship between husband and wife.

(2) The daughter Li Yingjie is underage. Divorce will do great harm to the child's body and mind, which is not conducive to the child's growth.

(3) The respondent in this case has both the desire and the possibility of reconciliation.

From this point of view, the divorce between the defendant and the defendant in this case is only an episode in the symphony of normal husband and wife life, and it is a "threshold" that almost every couple may encounter! The respondent believes that as long as the collegial panel can work according to the facts of the case, combined with the legal provisions, supplemented by patient and meticulous persuasion, it can resolve the "bump" between the respondent and the respondent and help the respondent cross this "threshold"! As a result, a family that should not have fallen apart was maintained.

To sum up, the respondent has no factual and legal basis for the respondent's claim, and requests the people's court to protect the respondent's legitimate rights and interests, rejects the respondent's claim against the respondent, and decides that the respondent is not allowed to divorce the respondent. The above defense opinions are requested to be adopted by our court.

I am here to convey

Beijing Daxing District People's Court

Respondents:

20____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The classic defense of agreeing to divorce Article 5 The respondent is _ _ _ _ _ _, male, born on _ _, Han nationality, farmer, and lives in _ _ _ _ _.

Respondent _ _ _ _ _ _, female, born on _ _, Han nationality, farmer, living in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

As the respondent sued me for divorce disputes, I hereby reply as follows:

1. I have always had a good relationship with the defendant _ _ _ _. The respondent claims that the relationship with my husband and wife is completely broken, which is not true, and requests to dismiss the respondent's divorce claim according to law.

In the plaintiff's complaint, it is not true that the two sides have different personalities and have no common language. I don't care about the defendant and the children. After full understanding and careful consideration, the respondent and I voluntarily registered for marriage. After marriage, the two sides have been living in harmony, loving each other, taking care of each other in life, encouraging each other in spirit, and the relationship between husband and wife has been very good. In order to support my family, I work hard outside to earn money, and the income from working has always been kept by the respondents. My parents get along well with the respondents, and they never ask the respondents to do farm work. The respondents also respect my parents very much, and the family relationship has always been very harmonious. Especially after the birth of our son _ _ _ _ _ in February of 20 10, our family life became more harmonious and happy.

The plaintiff's statement that they have been separated for more than half a year is untrue. We are not separated. I am alive. After the Spring Festival this year, I went out to work and often went home during my work.

After full understanding, the defendant and I voluntarily registered for marriage. After marriage, we established a deep relationship between husband and wife and had children. After careful consideration, I resolutely disagree with the defendant's request for divorce proceedings in order to avoid leaving regrets for hasty divorce and to give the child a complete home.

2. I hope that the respondent will handle our marriage relationship carefully, withdraw the request for divorce proceedings and create a better life together.

I have a deep emotional foundation with the respondents. I hope the respondents will consider our marriage feelings, give their children a complete home, and handle our marriage relationship carefully.

I know that the respondents are highly educated, strong in personality and self-motivated. Nowadays, children are younger. Working outside for a long time, I can't care and take care of the respondents and children like a long-term couple. As a husband and father, I also hope to get along with my wife and children day and night, but in order to make a living and be the economic pillar of my family, I have to shoulder my responsibilities. Going out to work is only a stopgap measure, and I can't do it.

I know that my relationship with the respondent is in crisis now, and I am willing to save our marriage with the greatest sincerity. If the respondent is not satisfied with me, or life is not satisfactory, we can communicate to the greatest extent, and I can try my best to improve myself and improve myself for the respondent and my son.

If the respondent is willing to go out and work hard with me, we can start a business in other places together and find a life path suitable for our development outside. If the interviewee thinks that I am working outside, which is not conducive to taking care of my family and my son, I can also take care of my family and go back to my hometown to start a business. Respondents and I are both educated and knowledgeable people, and we are still very young. I believe that if we work together, we will definitely change the status quo and live a happy life.

I have always been full of hope for our beautiful life in the future. I hope that the respondent will change his mind, understand and support me as always, jointly safeguard our family, create a relaxed and good living environment for the healthy growth of children, and withdraw the divorce lawsuit.

To sum up, my relationship with the respondent has not completely broken down. Although there is a crisis in our marriage at present, I am willing to do my best to save our marriage. I hope the court will do more mediation work and let us get back together. If mediation fails, I hope the court can give us a compound opportunity to reject the defendant's divorce claim according to law.

I am here to convey

_ _ _ _ _ _ People's Court

Defender:

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Classic defense for agreeing to divorce Article 6 Respondent (defendant): Kim _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

Id card: _ _ _ _ _? Tel: _ _ _ _

Defendant (plaintiff): Zhou, female, Han nationality, now living in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Jiangsu Province.

ID card: _ _ _ _ _ _ Tel: _ _ _ _ _ _

Defense request:

1, Zhou _ _ _ _ filed a divorce lawsuit, and your hospital has accepted it according to law. The defendant now pleads in the defendant's lawsuit. The respondent believes that the relationship between the two parties has not completely broken down, and the reasons for divorce put forward by the respondent do not meet the statutory divorce conditions stipulated in Article 32 of the Marriage Law of China, and the respondent does not agree to divorce.

2. Request to dismiss all the plaintiff's claims.

The reason for this is the following：

First, the relationship between the respondent and the respondent has not been completely broken, which does not meet the legal conditions for divorce, and the respondent's appeal grounds are completely unfounded.

(1) The relationship between the respondent and the respondent has not been completely broken, which does not meet the legal divorce conditions.

The Respondent and the Respondent were introduced by acquaintances in 2008, and after two years of free communication, a love relationship was established. During the period of love, we were very happy together and confided in each other's family background. With the development of time, our feelings have been sublimated day by day. We all met their parents and left a good impression on them. The defendant also gave a bride price according to the custom and got the defendant's consent. On May 20 10, both parties registered to get married, and then held a wedding reception. After the marriage, the Respondent and the Respondent treated each other as guests, and their relationship was always harmonious. On April 20th, 20 1 1, Hiuke married his son.

(2) The respondent and the respondent have a good emotional foundation.

The defendant and the defendant were introduced, fell in love for two years, got to know each other, and had a deep emotional foundation. The two sides have similar personalities and hobbies, and they can live in harmony before and after marriage, and their feelings are very good. After two years of love, marriage must be the result of careful consideration. Both parties have reached the legal age of marriage when they get married and have a deep understanding of each other. After marriage, they spent more than three years of happy life together. These basic facts cannot be denied by the defendant.

(3) The Respondent and the Respondent have lived in harmony.

The defendant believes that it is not true that the defendant often quarrels after marriage in the complaint. There have been quarrels, but they don't happen often. After marriage, the respondent and the respondent lived together in the respondent's home for more than a year. During this period, the parents and family members of the respondents treated me very well, treating me like my own son and brother, and never quarreled with their parents and family members. During my stay, my family also helped me solve many problems, such as work problems, washing and cooking. The defendant and his family cannot deny these facts.

(4) The respondent strongly disagreed with the divorce, so he did not make any defense on the issue of child support and property ownership.

(2) I urge the people's court to comprehensively consider the facts of the case and make a judgment that the respondent is not allowed to divorce the respondent in combination with the legal provisions.

1 The current situation of the relationship between the respondent and the respondent in this case is that although there are minor contradictions, it is a normal quarrel between husband and wife, which is far from the complete breakdown of the relationship between husband and wife.

The respondent in this case has both the desire and the possibility of reconciliation.

From this perspective, the divorce between the defendant and the defendant in this case is just a normal husband and wife life. An episode of Symphony of Pots and Pots is a "threshold" that almost every couple may encounter. The respondent believes that as long as the collegial panel can combine the facts of the case with the legal provisions, supplemented by patient and meticulous persuasion, it can resolve the "bump" between the respondent and help them cross this "threshold". As a result, a family that should not have disintegrated has also been maintained. Respondents are willing to give more tolerance and understanding, eliminate misunderstandings between them through communication, and are even more reluctant to see their young son hurt because of divorce, so that his son can live and grow up in a broken family from an early age.

To sum up, the respondent and the respondent have a deep emotional foundation, the relationship between husband and wife has not broken down, and there is no cause for divorce in the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China, so the respondent does not agree to dissolve the marriage relationship with the respondent, so please dismiss the lawsuit according to law.

I am here to convey

_ _ _ _ Mining Area People's Court

Respondents:

date month year