Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Hotel franchise - Diners eat in a restaurant in Xiasha, and want to pack the unfinished food. Why are they opposed by the boss?

Diners eat in a restaurant in Xiasha, and want to pack the unfinished food. Why are they opposed by the boss?

Because the boss said that it was bought by diners at that time, group purchases were not allowed to be packaged. So refuse the packaging requirements of diners.

Event review: A diner bought a service for four people online, and he could enjoy seven courses for less than 100 yuan, so the diner should also think it is more cost-effective.

Moreover, before they finished eating, they wanted to pack, but at this time, the boss said that they were a group purchase and could not pack. Diners thought that the cost of packing boxes was inevitable, so they offered to pay the cost of packing boxes, but the boss refused.

In the description of group purchase coupons, one is? Only in-class meals, not allowed to pack takeout before meals? Diners think that it is packaged after meals, which is not within the scope of this regulation, but the boss still refused the request for packaging.

Later, the diners poured all the dishes together to avoid being recycled. At this time, the boss spit out the diners and said that they could pack. Why do diners do this behavior?

After that, diners also put their own online? Wonderful? This experience was posted on the Internet, which caused a lot of discussion.

For consumers, it is reasonable to treat dishes and services after eating, since they are services and dishes that are paid for. However, packaging is a reasonable requirement, but it was opposed by the store and the dishes were poured together. It is also the store's spit. This kind of operation really makes people wonder if the reason why the store doesn't let the diners pack the dishes is that they want to recycle them to the diners at the next table.

But in any case, I think it is illegal for the store to do so. Diners have the right to dispose of the leftovers on their own tables, because they all pay for them themselves. Now the country is also advocating to solve the food problem, put an end to waste, and pack the leftovers for yourself. What else? Operation CD? .

Then why is it opposed by the store? I think it's estimated that the store thinks that the price of group purchase is originally ultra-low and affordable, and you can eat it without packaging. I don't know if such a rule will cause dissatisfaction among diners.