Mingding hotel

Changsha man died suddenly after playing mahjong with his friends, and his peers did not have to bear the responsibility.

Playing mahjong is a very common recreational activity, but some people are addicted to it and even play it all day. Because of sedentary, and the brain is particularly excited when playing, it has been in an excited state, which is prone to danger. Playing mahjong like a man is not a case of sudden death. There have been many such cases around me.

Changsha man asked a friend to open a room in a hotel to play mahjong.

A man in Changsha likes playing mahjong very much, and often gets together with friends of Ma You to play mahjong. One day, he and his friends played mahjong in the hotel. The more he plays, the more addicted he becomes. As a result, he played all night.

By 7 o'clock the next morning, several people were dismissed. Everyone left to do their own thing, and that person left. However, when he left for a few hours, something unexpected happened.

The man died suddenly after playing mahjong in the hotel.

These people had a good time before they left, because they used to play like this and never had any accidents. But this time, something unexpected happened. A few hours after the man went back, he suddenly felt uncomfortable and was immediately taken to the hospital for rescue. However, in the end, there was nothing I could do. I died without being rescued.

The sudden death of a man is hard for his family to accept. They believe that the man's death is related to several people playing mahjong in the hotel. These people who played mahjong with him should bear the corresponding responsibility for the man's death.

Do peers need to take responsibility?

So the man's family took the three people who played mahjong with the man to court and asked them to bear the liability for compensation. The compensation amount was nearly 300,000 yuan. After trial and investigation, the court finally concluded that the three men were not at fault and did not assume responsibility. Because the man's behavior is voluntary and has nothing to do with others, the family's appeal request was rejected.