Jay Chou sued Xiamen incomparable restaurant. Why?

Jay Chou sued Xiamen incomparable restaurant. Why?

The reason is that this restaurant in Xiamen is full of decoration, dishes and background. Jay Chou? Related elements attract many fans to punch in. This restaurant was not authorized by Jay Chou, so it was taken to court by Jay Chou.

During the trial, Jay Chou's attorney believed that Jay Chou was a famous artist, and his portrait and name had significant economic and spiritual benefits. However, the defendant's use of the plaintiff's portrait and name without the plaintiff's consent is an infringement of the plaintiff's portrait right, which increases the plaintiff's uncertain business risk and social moral responsibility, and demands the defendant to stop the infringement and compensate the economic loss of 500,000 yuan.

Although the case is still under investigation, Jay Chou did the right thing in this matter. Many unscrupulous merchants think that their shops are small, and celebrity heads can increase their popularity. If a celebrity sues, it's good to apologize, but it can raise awareness. There are many such unscrupulous shops, which make some famous artists speechless. They dare not sue him, dare not publicize him, and can only suffer dumb losses.

However, Jay Chou didn't. He directly took up the weapon of law, thinking that his shop was small and he could continue to infringe. Even if he sued for compensation for economic losses and got some publicity or exposure, he should not be allowed to damage his reputation, which is not worth the loss for Jay Chou. So, Jay Chou took up the weapon of law.

I personally agree with Jay Chou's behavior and think that Jay Chou's behavior is correct, so I have to let him go without worrying about giving him publicity. Although he also wants to survive, he can't infringe on others' reputation or portrait rights. This is immoral and illegal. It is also a good way to get economic benefits for those hesitant celebrities to find products that are not their own endorsements and sue them severely. what do you think?