The guest forgot to legally define the reason in the hotel wallet.

The legal name is forgetting things, not lost property.

First, forgetting things is different from lost property:

Forgotten things: once the owner recalls it, it is easy to find it back or know the approximate scope of the loss. In general, the property is not completely out of the control of the owner;

Lost property: the owner or the holder carelessly loses his property somewhere because of negligence, and it is difficult to recall where he lost it and find it, that is, the property is out of control.

Second, the essence of forgetting things and the lost property is the same: both property owners have lost control of their property unintentionally.

On the other hand, it is of little significance for judicial practice to define forgetting things and lost property according to the subjective mentality of the property owner or holder towards the out-of-control things. In a word, although it can be admitted that the lost property is different from forgetting things, both of them can be the objects of embezzlement in law because of their essential attributes. For example, in the case of lost property, the obligee may not know when, where and how his property was lost. In this case, it is difficult to ask the finder to return, so it is difficult to determine that the finder constitutes a crime of embezzlement (from the perspective of criminal proceedings), but the possibility of finding the finder and asking him to return cannot be ruled out. At this time, if he asks the finder to return and refuses to return, it can also constitute embezzlement.