Rui Red Hotel

Far Real Estate cheated lattice shop, and hundreds of millions of owners were cheated.

In the 1990s, Hong Kong Taimao Company bought the land in Times Square, and because there was no construction qualification, it linked the project to a construction company in Dongguan for development. 1998 after the Asian financial crisis broke out, the capital chain of Taimao Company was completely broken, and Times Square became one of more than a dozen unfinished buildings in Dongguan at that time. In 2000, the Dongguan Municipal Government began to rectify uncompleted residential flats. Times Square, located next to Guantai Avenue, is one of the key renovation buildings, which was later taken over by Hongyuan Real Estate Company. In 2003, a brand-new Times Square was built and sold. The real estate was confirmed in April, 20 1 1, and the real estate license was obtained in eight years. At the same time, the store opened on 20 12. Hongyuan Real Estate divided the original 400 sets of shops into 1 184 sets of plaid shops of several square meters and above on July 5th, 20th12nd, and established Dongguan Wanling Industrial Investment Co., Ltd. on June 2nd of the same year. The old Hongyuan Times Square was renamed Hongyuan Wanling Square (knocking on the edge of Guangzhou Wanling Square, which made the owners mistakenly think it was Guangzhou Wanling Square), and the luxury goods sales department of Hongyuan Wanling Square was set up in the elevator lobby of this project to jointly prosper Guangzhou Yiyuan Stationery Boutique Mall. Through bombing advertisements on the Internet, major newspapers and sales websites, false propaganda was carried out, which seriously misled consumers to buy. Its essence was to plan a seemingly perfect and legal project and achieve the purpose of illegally enriching money.

First, Hongyuan tried to make false propaganda, which seriously misled consumers to buy.

1. Serious false propaganda by public institutions. Hongyuan established Dongguan Wanling Industrial Investment Co., Ltd., which confused the concept. This "Dongguan Soul" is not "Guangzhou Soul". During the publicity, Hongyuan introduced Guangzhou Yiyuan (Zhou Enlai nominated China as the best), publicized Hongyuan Wanling as a branch of Guangzhou Yiyuan in Dongguan, and publicized the original operation of Guangzhou Yiyuan. The rent starts from 200, 65,438+000%. The most terrible thing is that the shops we bought for tens of thousands of square meters were rented into office buildings and warehouses as soon as they were put into trial operation. There are many new office buildings in Dongguan with 65438+100000 square meters. You're not a 200-300 rental store. Why did you cheat? Really want to cry without tears!

2. False propaganda of operating income. During the sales period, Hongyuan vigorously advocated one shop for three generations, with an annual return on investment of 65,438+00% and a high top fee. At present, the actual situation is bleak, and it is advocated to rent from 200-300 yuan/square meter. Now the lowest rent 15 yuan/square is proposed, and the highest rent/square is 60 yuan (street shops) (this is still in the case of strong rights protection by owners).

3. The scale of fictitious commercial websites. Hongyuan publicizes the modern parking lot with a business area of 23,000 square meters and 8,500 square meters, which is actually the residential parking lot of commercial housing upstairs. Upon investigation, the total area of 1-3 floor is only 12972.36 square meters, and the business area has been seriously reduced. Therefore, the fourth floor, which is currently used as the vacant commercial residential area above the podium and the overhead floor of the upstairs residence, falsely constitutes the business area and is vigorously promoted. At present, the owner found that the pool rate was as high as 60%, and seriously questioned that the pool area included the 4th floor of the overhead floor of the upstairs commercial house unrelated to the shopping mall (the shopping mall originally had only three floors, but it was registered as the 4th floor in the property ownership certificate), and asked the government to verify it.

Second, the pavement price seriously deviates from the evaluation price, which leads to the bank's failure to lend money. Hongyuan greatly exaggerated false propaganda, and the sales price seriously deviated from its actual price. The cooperative Dongguan Bank did not lend money in the past two years, and the unit price was more than four times higher than the estimated price (the estimated price was 6,000 yuan/square, but the actual price was 25,000 yuan/square). The owner applied for a bank loan in 2065, 438+02, and all kinds of information were complete. Because the estimated price is too low, the bank has not lent money for risk reasons. In order to collect the balance, Hongyuan defrauded some owners of the payment by giving them a 10% discount on the balance. At present, more than 20 million loans have not been approved. According to the bank, Dongguan Bank has returned the loan information to Hongyuan and refused to lend. Hongyuan can't give a reasonable explanation, and deceives the owner on the grounds that the bank is short of funds at present.

3. The delivered berth is inconsistent with the attached drawings of the contract structure, and the area is stolen. Some owners reported that when the bunk was delivered, it was found that there were large pillars in the actual bunk, which occupied indoor area, and the owner refused to accept the bunk (reported by news media). Hongyuan asked to close the berth before applying for treatment, but some of the pillars on the second floor were returned, and some were dragged away without treatment. This is a typical deception.

Fourth, Hongyuan uses the lattice shop to circle money, which seriously affects social stability.

Hongyuan Company divides 23,000 square meters (actual business area12,972.36 square meters) into 1 184 lattice shops, of which the smallest one has more than 2 square meters. The essence of this lattice shop is that developers only achieve the purpose of circling money, not operating at all. Such a small shop, the developer will be big when it is sold out. Owners can't run their own business at all, which will inevitably lead to a large number of rights protection by more than 1000 owners, which will affect social stability. After all, it's all hard-earned money, amounting to 500 million. In addition, according to relevant data, in the examination and approval of large-scale demolition of small shops, government departments require developers to keep 30% of the shops for their own operations, otherwise the large-scale demolition of small shops will not be approved. Now that Hongyuan has been sold out, is it illegal for the government regulatory authorities to approve it?

Five, Hongyuan set up a complex legal relationship to avoid its own risks. In order to operate Times Square perfectly, Hongyuan Company has set up a complicated purchase relationship. There are several signing companies in the contract, and the second floor is also sold in the sales department in front, and transferred to an individual named Pei Ruihong in the background (natural person: Pei Ruihong, now the lawyer has found out that this person is an ordinary farmer in a remote rural area of Henan Province, and it is impossible to buy a whole shop of nearly 5,000 square meters), which leads to the buyer paying the down payment. Only after signing the subscription book and contract did the first-hand shop purchased by Hongyuan Sales Department become second-hand, and questioned the sales staff. The salesperson said that one shareholder of Hongyuan did not affect it, and the deposit was not refunded, which led to the completion of the transaction. In this way, the buyer signed a contract with the individual and formed a second-hand transaction. Now our owners complain collectively, and Hongyuan takes legal measures to solve the problem (the whole transaction contract and process are planned in advance by Hongyuan's legal advisory group, and buyers are ignoring it step by step. Even a well-known listed company like Guangdong Hongyuan Group looks like this. How do we ordinary people fight? This is the case with listed companies in Dongguan. How do citizens trust Dongguan and the Dongguan Municipal Government?

Six, Hongyuan introduced Pei Ruihong to become a second-hand voyeur to avoid risks and evade taxes, with a huge amount.

Through false propaganda, the price of Hongyuan has been seriously inflated, which will inevitably lead to high taxes and fees. In order to achieve the purpose of tax evasion, Hongyuan transferred the entire shop on the second floor to Pei Ruihong's personal name while selling (when questioned, the staff of the sales department said that it was one of Hongyuan's shareholders)-this kind of property was not Pei Ruihong's property, and a sales contract was signed in the name of Pei Ruihong, which was suspected of contract fraud and seriously violated the law. Some owners get evidence to go to court (this kind of business relationship needs the government to verify its price, and it must be resold at an ultra-low price, which directly leads Hongyuan to avoid huge taxes), and then let the owners sign a second-hand house sales contract with Pei Ruihong to form a second-hand sale. Hongyuan operates a yin-yang contract, sells the contract with the owner at the actual price, and then unilaterally signs a yin contract that is lower than one-fifth of the real transaction price behind the owner's back. The amount of tax evasion submitted to the Housing Authority for filing and the local taxation bureau is huge, which seriously damages the interests of the state and the owners (for example, only tens of thousands of invoices are issued to the owners for hundreds of thousands of house purchases). Moreover, it seriously violated the real wishes of the owners and unilaterally signed a serious false contract illegally. It is suspected of fabricating contracts and documents to deceive state organs and individuals and infringe on the interests of the state and individuals.

(Note: There is a significant difference between the Yin-Yang contract planned and signed by Hongyuan and the Yin-Yang contract signed by second-hand merchants in the general market: generally, the signing of Yin-Yang contract by second-hand merchants is the result of negotiation between both parties and the owner's informed initiative; The Yin-Yang contract signed by Hongyuan is based on the first-hand shop for publicity, the second-hand shop for trading, and the low-price trading contract signed by the owner is unilaterally filed with the government department, with the purpose of covering up the illegal purpose and evading huge taxes by legal means. Its essence is that even the means are illegal. )

On June 8, 20 14, Hongyuan Company refused to deal with the rights protection actions with Hongyuan and the owners under the Hongyuan Real Estate Office Building of Hongyuan Hotel, and organized security guards, bodyguards and other personnel to beat the rights protection owners in the rights protection actions. Where is justice?

Contempt for national laws, regulations and dignity, jurisprudence is intolerable!

Owners have been demanding that the government uphold justice, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of owners and national interests, and strongly demand Hongyuan to correct major fraud, return the hard-earned money of owners, and maintain a fair and just economic environment and social stability! Highlight the social atmosphere of justice! Our owners will persistently safeguard the interests of individuals and the country and resolutely fight Hongyuan to the end! And reserve the right to take all channels of safeguarding rights and appeal step by step.

The majority of owners unanimously demand that the government uphold justice and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of owners and social stability.

Safeguard national interests and legal dignity.

The majority of owners unanimously demanded Hongyuan to return the hard-earned money and compensate for the losses, and severely punish its illegal behavior.