College students save people from drowning and collect corpses to use the price as material to write essays

1. A college student drowned while trying to save a child. An elderly man salvaged the body of the college student and asked for money to write an essay.

Three college students in Jingzhou, Hubei Province drowned while saving a child last month. They were rescued in the Yangtze River. The sinister eddy leaves permanent regrets.

The young man who sacrificed his life for righteousness received the respect and courtesy he deserved. The hero has been around for a long time, but this bravery for righteousness was not forgotten as quickly as usual. Soon after, photos of body retrievers tying the arms of the victims and seemingly asking for a price on the bow of the ship were widely circulated.

For a time, grief, anger and shame surrounded the audience. In addition to the sense of powerlessness caused by the tragedy, people question the inaction of the local government and question the black interest chain behind the scenes, but the truth is far from coming.

Through cross-corroboration of different media reports, some misunderstandings were reversed. For example, fishermen participated in the rescue and did not stand by as previously rumored. More importantly, it was confirmed that there is an underground ecosystem that monopolizes the business of fishing for corpses on the river.

Since the news has not yet touched on the core information, the full picture of this hidden industry is still unclear. Even so, their ruthless methods and money-first rules have been exposed.

When corpses unfortunately become a business, the conspiracy lurking behind them is chilling. There may be hidden connivance for profit between life and death, and rescuing people and retrieving corpses are juxtaposed in such a dazzling way.

The police, maritime and fire departments responsible for protection came and went empty-handed, leaving an empty river surface, allowing the unknown corpse collectors to shout out the price of life and death. This obvious meaning makes the event display multiple layers of metaphor.

The simple morality of saving people from fire and water has collapsed, lives and pleadings have been annihilated by money, people who must save themselves cannot get effective help, but they can only watch it pierce people's hearts, and the devil is entrenched between good and evil. . It is considered inappropriate to blindly carry out a moral crusade, because the scene of "holding a corpse and asking for a price" also shows the laxity of the *** department's responsibilities, including the lack of rescue capabilities, as well as the need for a thorough judicial investigation to clarify the whole story and give an explanation to the living. wait.

Moral condemnation cannot indeed bring back the lost lives, but this series of evil events has a lot to do with all kinds of moral weakness. Morality is never illusory, it is an overt or covert fact. It is a rescuer who does not care about his own life, and he is also a boss who discusses prices under a parasol, reflecting a life that can be disrespected at any time.

After this accident, the deeds of three heroes spread in the society. Not only did they save others, but they also provided the power to warm more hearts.

However, if the inside story behind "holding corpses for price" had been revealed one day earlier, if this bloody business could be cut off and replaced by a public warning, if the previous victims could awaken the ethics of responsible departments. ...If any of these "ifs" were realized, there would be no need to witness the sacrifice of heroes. The value of heroes should not just be praised. The more heroes alive, the better.

The local police should not only award honors for saving lives, but should also reflect on their dereliction of duty to the victims and make up for their oversight of hidden dangers. The undercurrent of the river that swallows young people has never been truly monitored. Judging from the inaction, the local police department has essentially given up on the life-and-death struggle on this stretch of water.

To a certain extent, the local police think that the way of awarding awards for righteousness is far away from the word righteousness. And this directly promotes the viciousness and monopoly of the corpse harvesting business.

The public's sentiments are hard to calm down. Not only do they hate the cold-bloodedness of those who fished out the corpses, but they also see the "uncensored" chaos on the river. Now it seems that it is not just the river surface that is dangerous.

In this "hunting" place for corpse hunters, there is an undisclosed conspiracy. If the police department cannot provide shelter to the people, and once the body becomes a bargaining chip for asking price, death will become a way for certain forces to make money.

The life-saving incident in Jingzhou unexpectedly did not end according to the process of good people and good deeds. Instead, it followed a logic similar to the law of blood reward and moved forward, directly provoking a broader sense of tragedy in the tragedy. No one knows how many times this cycle of shame will end. 2. An essay about fishermen fishing for corpses and asking for money for materials

Example: On December 6, Panzhihua, two little boys were playing by the Jinsha River when they found a rope tied to a stone. They curiously took the rope Pulling to the shore, I found a body tied to the rope.

The deceased was named Deng Shuchao, 25 years old, from Renhe District, Panzhihua City. He committed suicide by jumping into the river on November 30. Why was his body tied in the river? It is understood that four days after Deng Shuchao jumped into the river, several local fishermen salvaged his body and demanded 18,000 yuan for the recovery fee.

Because the price had not been negotiated, the father of the deceased, Deng Gangming, had no choice but to let his son's body float in the river for three more days. On December 6, after paying the fisherman 5,400 yuan, Deng Gangming took away his son's body.

The young man committed suicide by jumping into the river, and the fishermen picked up the body. "November 30, this is the last time we see our child." Yesterday, Deng Gangming was heartbroken when talking about his son's death.

He said that on the morning of November 30, his son returned to his hometown and said he wanted 6,000 yuan. “We asked him what he would use it for, and he said that the one-year lease of the taxi was coming up, and Two months’ rent has not been paid.” Because Deng Shuchao’s parents are both farmers and cannot afford the money for the time being, he hopes to wait two days to sell the fruit before paying him back.

Deng Shuchao left home and returned to the city without getting the money. Deng Gangming introduced that his son contracted the taxi from the owner Luo.

On December 2, Luo called and said that Deng Shuchao had not taken over the job. Unable to contact their son, the family had no choice but to call the police. Finally, they found the car, but there was no trace of him.

"The police said that at about 14:50 on November 30, someone called the police saying that a man jumped into the river and committed suicide on the Midi Bridge." Deng Gangming said that the local police called in surveillance cameras to ask them to identify , the man who jumped into the river was none other than Deng Shuchao.

On the afternoon of December 3, Deng Shuchao’s parents received another call from the police, saying that fishermen had salvaged a body at the intersection of the Yalong River and the Jinsha River and asked them to come over. After identification, it was the body of his son.

The police later determined that it was homicide and Deng Shuchao committed suicide by jumping into the river. 3. An essay about fishermen fishing for corpses and asking for money for materials

Example essay

On December 6, Panzhihua, two little boys were playing by the Jinsha River when they found a stone with a rope tied to it. Curiously, they pulled the rope to the shore and found a body tied to the rope.

The deceased was named Deng Shuchao, 25 years old, from Renhe District, Panzhihua City. He committed suicide by jumping into the river on November 30. Why was his body tied in the river? It is understood that four days after Deng Shuchao jumped into the river, several local fishermen salvaged his body and demanded 18,000 yuan for the recovery fee. Because the price had not been negotiated, the deceased's father, Deng Gangming, had no choice but to let his son's body float in the river for three more days. On December 6, after paying the fisherman 5,400 yuan, Deng Gangming took away his son's body.

The young man committed suicide by jumping into the river and the fishermen picked up the body

"On November 30, this was the last time we saw our child." Yesterday, Deng Gangming was filled with grief when talking about his son's death. Absolutely. He said that on the morning of November 30, his son returned to his hometown and asked for 6,000 yuan. “We asked him what he would use it for, and he said that the one-year lease of the taxi was coming up, and there were still two months of rent left. ". Because Deng Shuchao’s parents are both farmers and cannot afford the money for the time being, he hopes to wait two days to sell the fruit before paying him back. Without getting the money, Deng Shuchao left home and returned to the city.

Deng Gangming introduced that his son contracted the taxi from the owner Luo. On December 2, Luo called and said that Deng Shuchao had not taken over the job. Unable to contact their son, the family had no choice but to call the police. Finally, they found the car, but there was no trace of him.

"The police said that at about 14:50 on November 30, someone called the police saying that a man jumped into the river and committed suicide on the Midi Bridge." Deng Gangming said that the local police called in surveillance cameras to ask them to identify , the man who jumped into the river was none other than Deng Shuchao. On the afternoon of December 3, Deng Shuchao’s parents received another call from the police, saying that fishermen had salvaged a body at the intersection of the Yalong River and the Jinsha River and asked them to come over. After identification, it was the body of his son. The police later determined that it was homicide and Deng Shuchao committed suicide by jumping into the river.

4. Speech about college students saving people from drowning

About the fact that alumni saved people from drowning...?

At around two o'clock in the afternoon, by the Yangtze River in Shashi District, Jingzhou City Two boys aged 12 or 13 were drowning. At that time, more than a dozen freshman students saw the situation and formed a ladder to rescue the people. Among them were some who could not swim and a female classmate. When the second child was about to be rescued ashore, he was exhausted due to physical exhaustion and There was an undercurrent, and the ladder fell apart. Nine college students fell into the water, and there were shouts of help. Just in time, several sixty-year-old men from the winter swimming team rescued six college students. The other three college students drowned, and two were nearby. It was a fish boat. There were people on the boat, but no one went to rescue them. The fire brigade was the first to arrive at the scene, but they said they didn’t have a diving suit or other rescue equipment, so they fished for a while on the river (news footage) and then returned ashore. After being stopped by several crying college students nearby, I went back to the riverside to watch without intending to go into the water to fish for anyone. The boat from the Maritime Safety Administration took a look and then left. The school leaders arrived at the scene two hours later. The bosses of the two fishing boats mentioned discussed the cost of fishing out the corpses at 12,000 yuan each, and then the bosses of the fishing boats let people go into the water to start fishing. When the first corpse was fished out, the audience burst into tears. The position where the corpse was fished out was far away The fishing boat was less than three meters tall. At that time, as long as the people on the boat threw the oar over, they could be rescued. I felt really uncomfortable watching it. And when the body came up, it looked like the doctor was still using oxygen to save it. (News footage) At this time, we were close to the incident. It had been three hours. When the body of the second college student was retrieved, the owner of the fishing boat stopped and refused to retrieve the body, saying that the 24,000 yuan was not available. There was a lot of condemnation from the surroundings. In the end, the teachers knelt down and paid 11,000 yuan. All the bodies were sold, and the third body was not recovered until after six o'clock. Until now, the two children who were rescued have disappeared and cannot be found. However, the news said that the fire and maritime bureaus recovered the bodies. , when you read everything I said, you may not believe it, but if you look carefully at the news footage, you can see five or six people from the fire brigade diving, and you have never seen the Maritime Safety Administration. What does the state do to raise them? , it is their responsibility to salvage the corpses, but no one from the government has come forward to do it. I personally guarantee that what I said is true. It’s so chilling. I really can’t stand the government anymore. Fishing boat owner and parents of young children. ?

None of them would have died. There was a fishing boat nearby. Those classmates cried and knelt down and begged the fishermen to go rescue them. Several fishermen were indifferent. It is said that people often die from drowning. There is a salvage team that costs 12,000 to salvage a body, but they usually don’t save it! That’s a way to make money! ?

Silence, only silence. ? 5. An argumentative essay about college students jumping into a river to save others

The following are all said by the people at the scene, but it is a pity that they were mercilessly avoided by the media! !

None of them would have died. At that time, there was a fishing boat nearby. Those classmates cried and knelt down and begged the fishermen to come and save people. Several fishermen were indifferent. It is said that people who drowned often died in local fisheries. Team, it costs 12,000 to salvage a body, and they usually don’t save it! That’s a way to make money!

Two children who fell into the water "disappeared" after being rescued ashore

Where did you go after being rescued? There is no conscience and no justice! If you still have some humanity, please stand up! Go apologize to the families of the victims, even say thank you!

Why not report the incident? In the end, the bodies of several college students were soaked in the river. The firefighters refused to salvage them, saying that it would cost 10,000 yuan to salvage one body. . . Forced teachers to kneel

Today I have read a lot of reports about "freshman students from Yangtze University making heroic sacrifices to save lives". They are nothing more than some "heroes who saved lives and moved the whole country" and "deep mourning" "Dedicate yourself to college students" and so on. This incident has also given many people an additional topic to talk about after dinner.

Being in Jingzhou, I am lucky enough to know some of the legendary "shady stories"! The following is what a person at the scene said:

At around two o'clock in the afternoon, two men aged 12 or 13 drowned on the bank of the Yangtze River in Shashi District, Jingzhou City. At that time, more than a dozen first-year college students drowned. Seeing the situation, they formed a man ladder and went into the water to save others. Among them were some students who could not swim and a female classmate. When the second child was about to be rescued ashore, due to lack of physical strength and undercurrent, the man ladder fell apart. Nine college students fell into the water, and the cry for help was immediately heard. A few sixty-year-olds from the winter swimming team rescued six college students. Three other college students drowned. There were two fishing boats near the drowning. There were people on the boats but no one went to save them. The fire brigade He was the first to arrive at the scene, but he said he did not have a diving suit or other rescue equipment, so he fished for a while by the river (news footage) and then went back ashore. He was stopped by several crying college students nearby, so he went back to the river to watch and There was no intention of going into the water to fish for people, but the Maritime Safety Administration boat took a look and then left. The school leaders arrived at the scene two hours later and discussed the cost of fishing for the bodies with the owners of the two fishing boats mentioned earlier. In case of accident, the owner of the fishing boat let people start to fish out the water. When the first body was fished out, the onlookers burst into tears. The position where the body was fished out was less than three meters away from the fishing boat. At that time, as long as the people on the boat threw the oar over, I felt so bad when I watched, and the doctor pretended to use oxygen to rescue the body when it came up. (News footage) It was already three hours after the incident. When the body of the second college student was picked up, , the owner of the fishing boat stopped the operation, saying that the 24,000 yuan was not in place, and refused to salvage the bodies. There was a subterranean scolding. In the end, the teacher knelt down before closing the deal for 11,000 bodies. It was after six o'clock that the third body was salvaged. So far, the two rescued children have disappeared and cannot be found. However, the news said that the fire and maritime bureaus recovered the bodies.

When you see all this, you may not believe it, but if you look carefully at the news footage, you can see five or six people from the fire brigade walking in shallow water. The Maritime Safety Administration has never been seen. What do they do? Salvaging corpses is their responsibility, but no one comes out to do it. It's so chilling!

I just feel that we know the truth better, and we have the responsibility to let people know the origin of the so-called "heroes"! Leave the rest to the world to comment!

Transferred from the school

We would rather not have such a hero. What our parents want is health. We who are ordinary are not already gone. We who are martyrs "Anyone with conscience will reprint it for me after seeing it" 6. An essay about asking for a price after holding a corpse

The truth about asking for a price for corpses and the questioning triggered moral thinking. News background: On October 24, 2009, 15 students from Yangtze University, including Chen Shishi, He Dongxu, and Fang Zhao, rescued two children who fell into the water while having a picnic in the Jingzhou Baotawan section of the Yangtze River. Three classmates, Chen Shishi, Fang Zhao and He Dongxu, were unfortunately swallowed by the river and gave up their young lives.

When the salvage company salvaged the body, it was asking for a sky-high price. Faced with the "begging" of the students, the individual salvagers not only remained unmoved, but also held the body and demanded a price. One day, they charged 36,000 yuan. The matter of collecting money for corpses. This incident has received widespread attention from the media, and public opinion has unanimously condemned the act of holding a body and asking for a price, which broke the bottom line of social morality and humiliated all Chinese people.

Controversy over the scale of the photo: The Propaganda Minister of Yangtze University pointed out that the photo was inconsistent with the facts. The selection of the 2010 National Photography Art Exhibition was announced. The photo "Holding a Corpse for Price" won the silver medal in the documentary category. Suddenly, the Internet was There was a lot of discussion about this award-winning photo, and there was no consensus. The material of "Carrying a Corpse for a Price" comes from the incident where a college student in Jingzhou, Hubei Province died heroically to save a drowning child, but the salvage company charged an exorbitant price for salvaging the body.

This incident received widespread media attention at the end of last year, and public opinion unanimously condemned the act of holding a body and asking for a price, which broke the bottom line of social morality and humiliated all Chinese people. However, the award for the news photo reflecting the incident caused controversy.

This photo clearly shows the good and evil of human nature: in the water is the body of a young man who sacrificed his life to rescue a child who fell into the water, and on the boat are two people holding the body of the hero with two cold ropes and bargaining. A middle-aged and elderly salvage customer. Many people believe that this photo should not win the award because it is disrespectful to the hero to show his body again.

Some netizens directly questioned how the family members of the deceased would feel if they saw this photo. If it is just to warn of an "evil", do we need to pay the price of secondary harm to the relatives of the deceased? Emotionally, many people disagreed with this photo winning because it wasn't "human" enough. But in fact, this is not the first time that the photo "Hold a Corpse for Price" has won an award.

On January 23, 2010, the results of the preliminary evaluation of the 18th Golden Lens Competition and Huasai Chinese Works were announced, and "Carcass for Price" won the Best News Photo Award of the Year; February 4, 2010, China The "2009 China Moment China News Photo Contest (3rd)" sponsored by the Journalists Association was announced, and "Hold a Corpse for a Price" won the first prize. Including the selection of the National Photography Art Exhibition, this is the third time "Hold a Corpse for Price" to win the award.

A news photo that caused huge controversy has won awards one after another. Are the judges really "cold-blooded"? Even the author Zhang Yi was quite surprised that this photo won consecutive awards. After all, "the chances of showing negative things to win awards are very few." No matter how strange the viewer's feelings are, this photo truly shows a malady in today's society, and the pain shown is like a needle pointed directly at people's hearts.

It is no exaggeration to say that this is a microcosm of a real image in society. What reason do we have to deny it the award? Can't works that truly reflect reality, criticize current ills and point out ugly phenomena win awards? Does real art have to be divorced from the simple feelings of the viewer? To put it bluntly, our entanglement with the award-winning photo "Hold a Corpse for Price" may actually be due to our incomplete understanding of the relationship between art and society.

What must be faced squarely is that sometimes art may not be able to take into account the feelings of all individuals when reflecting public concern. To a certain extent, this contradiction is irresolvable. The photo "Holding a Corpse for Price" as a whole attempts to tell the viewer by showing a kind of ugliness that the body of the second student who died has also been recovered, what is missing in the anomie environment, and the unconscious "harm" to the hero during it, we are Shouldn't we be more tolerant? We can understand the emotional entanglement of the viewers on "Killing the Corpse for a Price," but there are still some reasons for resisting the award for "Killing the Corpse for a Price" on the grounds of "showing the ugliness of the Chinese people" or citing nihilistic "harm." Arrogant.

Official investigation conclusion: The Jingzhou City People’s Government held a press conference on November 7, 2009 to inform the public about the entire process of salvaging the remains of three college students. According to the requirements of the Jingzhou Municipal Party Committee and Municipal *** leaders, the Municipal *** Office, Municipal Party Committee Propaganda Department, Municipal Legal Committee, Municipal *** Legal Affairs Office, Municipal Letters and Calls Bureau, Municipal Public Security Bureau, Municipal Industry and Commerce Bureau, Municipal Price Bureau, Yangtze River Shipping The Jingzhou Branch of the Public Security Bureau and Yangtze University set up a special work team to conduct a joint investigation from October 31st to November 4th on the related situations that some media and netizens questioned, such as ignoring death and forgetting one's own interests.

The investigation team found that around 14:40 that day, Yangtze University teacher Shi Qianli received a call and rushed to the scene of the incident at around 15:20. When he arrived at the scene, he found two iron boats with blue sides docked on the shore.

Shi Qianli boarded the ship and asked the shipowner to immediately salvage the fallen students and promised to pay the salvage fee. People on the boat said they needed to contact the boss first. When Shi Qianli contacted Chen Bo on the phone, Chen Bo said, "It cost 12,000 yuan to fish out a body, but it cost 6,000 yuan if we didn't fish it out, and we had to pay a deposit first."

It was not until Secretary Wang from the School of Arts and Sciences of Yangtze University and others rushed to the scene to collect 4,000 yuan in cash that the salvage ship started working. More than 10 minutes later, the first body was recovered. Because the salvage fee of 12,000 yuan was not paid in full, the salvage vessel stopped salvage.

After the work of Secretary Wang, the leader of the School of Arts and Sciences, and others, the salvage ship picked up the second body more than 20 minutes later. After that, the salvage boat stopped salvaging again, with a break of about an hour. After Pan Lin, the accountant of the College of Arts and Sciences, delivered the 20,000 yuan in cash, the salvage boat continued the salvage operation.

About half an hour later, the third body was recovered. The salvage was finally completed around 18:00.

The investigation team of the Golden Lens Jury stated that there was no fraud. The authenticity of "Holding a Corpse for a Price", which won the China News Photography "Golden Lens" Best News Photo Award of the Year, caused controversy. 》The investigation conclusion of the news facts involved in the picture has been concluded, and it is believed that the news of "Holding a Corpse for Price" is true and there is no problem of fraud.

The investigation conclusions are divided into three points: 1. The news event of "holding corpses for price" reflected in the photos does exist; 2: Although the main character in the photos, Wang Shouhai, is not the mastermind, he objectively participated in the process of holding bodies for price. The executor of an act; 3: The process of photographic recording is part of the entire price charged for kidnapping a body.

Although Wang Shouhai tried his best to argue that he did not ask for a price, according to witnesses at the scene, Wang Shouhai and others were parties involved. 7. On the value of life (revolving around the rescue incident of three college students)

Which is more precious, the lives of two children or three college students?

When it comes to life, there is no distinction between high and low.

When it comes to knowledge, after more than ten years of education, three college students have spent more resources than two children.

The value of three people should be greater than that of two children.

But being brave is a valuable quality and a fine tradition of a nation.

Three virtuous people The righteous college students sacrificed themselves for the lives of others, but their spirit will remain forever and will

inspire thousands of Chinese people, awaken our conscience, awaken the sense of social responsibility, and awaken people to The constant pursuit of the value of life! !

Personal opinion, I hope it will be helpful to you. 8. College student Meng Ruipeng dived to save others and sacrificed himself to write an essay on the topic

But Go changed me. When learning Go, I saw countless Go masters throughout the ages. No matter what difficulties they encountered in playing chess, they could always persevere to the end. Guli persisted in his Go career throughout his life. Guli often said: "It doesn't matter whether you win or lose in Go, as long as you can persist to the end, you are the winner!" Edison said: "No matter when, no matter what situation I encounter, I will never allow myself to be a little bit discouraged. Frustrated. "Mrs. Curie said: "We should have perseverance, especially self-confidence! We must believe that our talents are used to do something. "So, I became the one who persisted.

Knowledge has changed my attitude and taught me to treat everything seriously and responsibly; knowledge has changed my behavior and taught me to help others; knowledge has changed my Ideas make me different...

No matter it is the past, present or future, whether it is yesterday, today or tomorrow, knowledge will never stop its pace, it will always be recited in Chinese, in Calculating in mathematics, reciting in English...

It is knowledge that changed me! It is knowledge that keeps me moving forward! 9. Essay on heroes who rescued people in the Yangtze River shipwreck incident

On the afternoon of October 24, in order to save two teenagers who fell into the water, more than 10 college students from Hubei Yangtze University jumped into the river hand in hand to rescue. In the end, the two teenagers were saved. , but the exhausted college students fell into the river.

Three winter swimming team members 100 meters away rushed over and tried their best to rescue the six college students, but the three college students Chen Jishi, He Dongxu, and Fang Zhao unfortunately died. Subsequently, multiple posts on the Internet pointed out that when the students were rescuing people, two fishing boats were parked nearby, but they never came to rescue.

Not only that, during the subsequent process of salvaging the remains, the salvagers also insisted on paying 12,000 yuan for each body. If the money was not enough, no one would be rescued. In related reports, some members of the winter swimming team who participated in the rescue said bluntly: If the fishing boat had rescued, the tragedy would not have happened.

The elderly winter swimming team who took the initiative to take on the responsibility of riverside rescue, the corpse collectors who salvaged corpses at high prices and were regarded as cold-blooded, the riverside fishermen trapped in moral crusade, and the relevant public officials who claimed that they were "powerless"... ...Before getting over the emotion of the three college students who drowned while saving others, public opinion began to focus on the good and evil, cold and warmth, crime and punishment behind the incident. Did the two fishing boats ignore their fate? The waters of Pagoda Bay where the accident occurred is a backwater area with dense whirlpools and undercurrents.

At the time of the drowning incident, two fishing boats were parked under the embankment of Pagoda Bay. The fishing boats were closer to the students who fell into the water than the river bank.

On a fishing boat, there was Chen Hengyun, a man in his 60s and the owner of the boat, who claimed to have pulled a young man and a college student who fell into the water, with Xu Gang, the son of an acquaintance; on the other boat, there was 70-year-old Chen Xuande and his wife Xiong Shaoxiang. Fishing nets were hung on the fishing boats. After the students who went into the water to rescue people were found missing, people began to beg the fishermen to fish them out.

"We don't have the tools and can't get people." Chen Xuande explained to reporters afterwards.

Regarding the previous accusation of "ignoring death", Chen Xuande insisted: One of the two swimming rings floating on the water at that time was thrown by the winter swimming team who came to the rescue, and the other was dropped by the rescue team. Throw it yourself. Not only that, he also stretched out a long pole into the river and pulled up three college students one after another.

However, this statement is obviously contradictory to the accounts of everyone and the winter swimming team members. After the "human ladder" the students used when entering the water broke and fell into the water, six students were rescued in a row, and the three winter swimming team members Han Deyuan, Lu Dezhong, and Yang Tianlin rescued three, two, and one person respectively.

Only Han Deyuan said that when he was exhausted when rescuing the third person, he asked the fisherman to extend his pole to help, and the fisherman did so. The attitudes of college students and onlookers were even more intense: The fishing boat was motionless and there was no way to save it! On October 29, the Jingzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau responded to the online post, stating that it had set up a special investigation team to investigate whether the fishing boats were ignoring the situation and taking advantage of the opportunity to make huge profits.

Due to the active actions of the authorities, the public began to pay attention to the truth about "seeking death without saving" and "taking corpses at high prices." The families of the three students who died also submitted a joint letter demanding to find out the truth about the fishing boat.

On October 28, a memorial service was held for the three college students who died. Tens of thousands of citizens went to the funeral home to pay their respects. In the urban area, people also spontaneously gathered at Pagoda Bay to commemorate the event on their own.

This morning, Chen Xuande and Xiong Shaoxiang stopped at the Baotawan River as usual, preparing to sell fish. Unexpectedly, as soon as the boat docked, it was quickly recognized by the citizens.

Someone shouted, "This is the fishing boat that refused to save it that day." Citizens surrounded Chen Xuande's fishing boat, smashed the boat and took away the fishing nets.

Xiong Shaoxiang, who was holding the fishing net tightly, was pulled off the boat and onto the shore. Someone started throwing stones at the boat, and Chen Xuande quickly sailed away.

Xiong Shaoxiang, who stayed on the shore, quickly left with the help of the police who arrived. Only the fishing nets snatched away by citizens were burned clean.

This incident was spread widely by citizens in the following days, and those who heard about it applauded. Support composition me.