Self-portrait of China Southern Airlines stewardess hotel.

The flight attendant used the goods during working hours to do WeChat business. She was reported for sending underwear photos in the bathroom and was expelled from China Southern Airlines! A flight attendant of China Southern Airlines took a selfie in underwear while waiting for the flight restriction in the plane bathroom, and sent a circle of friends. Later, the flight attendant deleted this circle of friends, but it was still reported by a friend's screenshot. The company learned that the flight attendant violated the company regulations and caused bad influence, so it fired him.

Ms. Guo claimed that all the passengers did not board the plane at that time. During the break, in order to thank her friends for giving her underwear, she took a selfie in the bathroom on the plane, which did not reach the serious degree of canceling the labor contract. Therefore, she appealed to the Commission for Discipline Inspection of China Southern Airlines, demanding that China Southern Airlines cancel the decision to terminate the labor contract and continue to perform the labor contract between the two parties. The following month, the human resources department of China Southern Airlines replied that Ms. Guo's behavior of publishing indecent photos during working hours did have a negative impact on the brand image of China Southern Airlines. After research by the cabin department, it seriously violated the company's rules and regulations.

This is because the labor law stipulates. Only by dissolving the labor contract according to the provisions of Articles 24, 26 and 27 can economic compensation be obtained. Therefore, the stewardess who was dismissed for violating the rules and regulations of the employer lost this precious right and could not get any compensation. At the same time, if the contract is terminated in this way, the company has no obligation to notify in advance and can terminate it at any time.

In this case, Guo clearly knew that his behavior was improper. It is conceivable that if only bonuses and wages are deducted, she may not be obsessed with the lawsuit. After all, according to relevant laws, she can only file a lawsuit through labor arbitration, and the time cost is not very low. Guo's behavior is also quite special, which is different from illegal behavior and belongs to a gray area. Maybe if another court ruled, the result would be different.

Guo 14 joined China Southern Airlines and has taken up the post of flight attendant. Before the incident, she was preparing to meet the passengers who flew from Guangzhou to Shanghai that day. Unexpectedly, due to flight restrictions, the flight was delayed for an hour, and the passengers had not boarded the plane, so the crew had to "concentrate on rest" on the plane.

Therefore, when we look at the incident that "the stewardess was fired for taking underwear photos in the airplane bathroom", we must follow the consistency of the incident, otherwise it won't make sense. China Southern pointed out that Ms. Guo's flight was not grounded, but the flight was delayed and still in working hours. Its behavior is not only the behavior of playing mobile phones in the circle of friends, but also a series of behaviors such as changing clothes, taking photos, retouching pictures, watermarking and making friends in the bathroom, which has a great adverse impact on aviation safety, company image and internal management. Ms. Guo engaged in private affairs during working hours, regardless of safety responsibilities, which seriously affected flight safety.

Ms. Guo replied that the selfie took place during group breaks, not during working hours. Moreover, this behavior is to help friends publicize, there is no profit-making activity, and it has not been widely spread afterwards, which has not adversely affected the reputation of China Southern Airlines. The company's accusation that her behavior affected flight safety is groundless.

This reality was directly attacked because the stewardess stated that "even if I was attacked by the internet, I would say it", which is more like an expected metaphor. Frankly speaking, how can a flight attendant not be afraid of cyber violence? It's just that she doesn't want to die in the face of the turbulent network storm, at least she doesn't want to bow her head easily in her attitude.

Let's review her photos and the words in her circle of friends: "The plane was late, so I immediately came to the bathroom to try new products and felt naked. The feeling of experience is really the same as not wearing it. Super invincible and comfortable After wearing naked kiss underwear for such a long time, the chest shape has also risen. This kind of nude feeling, I wear 75B. " Flight attendants in China always seem to be different from other service personnel. Although they are all service industries, they are all called "flight attendants" and "empty".

Waiters in other industries will always be discriminated against in their work, but they will be respected, even respected, and they are very popular in recruitment. On the one hand, the income of flight attendants far exceeds that of ordinary service personnel, and on the other hand, they need more professional knowledge and take on more responsibilities.

Secondly, the pictures she sent can clearly see the plane cabin, and the sketch also points out that she is in the plane bathroom, wearing underwear to take pictures on public transport during work hours, which is harmful to public order and good customs and her professional image; At the same time, as a flight attendant, Guo's above behavior is bound to have a negative impact on the airline's image and safety reputation.

In the end, the court held that Guo, as a flight attendant with fifteen years' service, should be more aware of the negative impact of publishing indecent photos in a circle of friends on China Southern's image, aviation safety reputation and public order and good customs. Therefore, it is reasonable for airlines to think that Guo's act of posting indecent selfies during his duty constitutes a serious violation of discipline. The airline canceled the labor contract according to law and rejected Guo's claim.