What behaviors do interviewers hate most in the interview?

I have been an examiner for many years and have experienced many interviews. When it comes to behaviors that examiners hate or dislike, there are roughly the following situations.

First, candidates are too mechanical in answering questions. This is a common problem of most interviewees at present, especially at the beginning and end. At the beginning, candidates begin to answer questions, and at the end, candidates complete the questions. This is not a big mistake. However, the pattern of all candidates is the same, and the examiner is tired of hearing the same words all day. In fact, it is really unnecessary, especially at the beginning. Just answer directly. Another example is the examination questions for organizing activities. Many candidates apply the routines they learned during training, completely ignoring the specific problems of this question, which is a complete waste of the examiner's time.

Second, the candidate is too high-profile. In order to show their ability and level, many candidates are very conceited, which makes people feel that they have a big tone and strong ability. For example, when evaluating yourself, the overall coordination ability is very strong, which is obviously unrealistic. What can a young man do? It would be better to be modest in the interview.

Third, the expression is too superficial. When many candidates are thinking, they don't think through the problem and completely float on the surface. For example, dealing with contradictions means that I should do ideological work patiently and meticulously, and not do what kind of ideological work in depth. In fact, candidates should do substantive simulation analysis, analyze all possible reasons clearly, and distinguish different reasons to do well.

Fourth, emotional expression is dull. This is also one of the problems that examiners can't stand. Interview is actually a kind of communication. This kind of communication is complaining about feelings. Whether it is a good phenomenon or an act that should be criticized, the candidate's expression will change with the change of expression content. If you are expressionless from beginning to end, the examiner will not evaluate you very well.

This is the most dangerous behavior of candidates I have summarized for many years. If the examinee has such behavior, the result will be very dangerous. This is not to please the examiner, but to meet the needs of the interview.

After reading it, I have said all the answers. I want to add two points, which are often not mentioned in the "interview book", but they are very important:

First, don't be too sophisticated, especially young people with short qualifications.

Some interviewers will ask some difficult questions, such as:

"If your father is seriously ill in hospital, and you are preparing to go home to visit him, people have arrived at the airport and suddenly there is a very important project. Customers inform their big boss that you should prepare for the meeting immediately. If you miss this opportunity, there is little hope for this project. What would you choose? "

What should be the correct answer to this question?

In fact, these two answers are not right or wrong. This question envisages a very extreme plot, which can only be seen in some dog blood TV dramas. In fact, the interviewer wants to see you struggle, see you hesitate, and want to know what kind of sacrifice you will make and why.

The wrong answer is not "choose a job" or "go home", but "choose easily without thinking", which means you are hiding your true thoughts.

Any leader doesn't like subordinates who are too sophisticated, which will make him afraid to trust you and lack trust. This is a taboo in work cooperation.

In the competition between young people and old people, "seniority" is a disadvantage, but "simplicity" is an advantage. Don't hide it.

Second, pay close attention to "Do you have any questions?"

Once, we interviewed an assistant director by telephone. At the end of the interview, we asked the applicant a question as usual:

"Is there anything else to ask?"

As a result, he asked us a question that stunned us: "Does the company have a dormitory?"

Apart from this special case, I found that most people would ask some questions about salary and benefits, which actually wasted a valuable opportunity.

You know, the interview is two-way, the company is choosing you, and I ask you a bunch of questions; You are also choosing a company, and this question is one of your few opportunities.

I have met better questions, and I will ask the classic questions in the interview in turn to understand the ins and outs of this position:

"This position is new or original? What are the former employees of this position doing now? Why did he quit? " (judging the development prospect of the position and its position in the company)

"What is the division of labor and cooperation between this position and XXX (related positions)?" (Judging the working status of the post)

"What is the best employee you have ever seen? How long have you been in this position, and how are your former subordinates now? " Judge whether your boss's ability conflicts with your three views.

As long as you can't know the information, you can ask, and it will not be rejected. Of course, first of all, understand why you ask this question, if you judge the other person's answer.

I have participated in several recruitment interviews for civil servants and career editors in organs, institutions and towns. Sitting on the judge's bench, I saw some questions and wrote them down for the respondents' reference:

Candidates should remember one thing: therefore, all emotions should be considered in the whole process from entering the door to going out, which is also the embodiment of the overall awareness and ability to control the overall situation. Candidates should have a clear understanding of the interview, know that the interview is by no means a written test, and don't delay too long when preparing the answer, because the examiner will think that you are afraid to answer because you can't grasp the main points quickly. If you are worried about poor expression, quickly record the key words of each point. Candidates should pay special attention to oral expression: the most important thing is to pay attention to details, make full preparations and take the interview seriously. At present, there are many institutions that specialize in counseling interviews. If you choose those who have a good reputation and are willing to invest, you will get a return.

Behavior 1: Shake your legs.

The action of shaking your legs, although not too out of line, will make the interviewer extremely uncomfortable and make him unable to concentrate. Shaking one's legs usually happens when one is "idle" or relaxed, which may be an unconscious act to release tension. Sometimes, a certain part of the applicant's body (such as hands or elbows) will touch the desktop, and when shaking his legs, the shaking will be transmitted to the table, making the whole table shake. You can imagine such a "shaking your legs" scene, and the interviewer doesn't hate it. It should be reminded that people don't shake their legs when they are highly focused, so the interviewer will judge the candidate's inattention, inattention and inattention according to the action of shaking his legs.

Behavior 2: lean back.

Some candidates, whether arrogant or subconsciously trying to avoid the interviewer, will lean back in the interview and face the interviewer sideways, showing a nonchalant look, but in fact they are very nervous. The interviewer will take "leaning back" as a kind of "not paying attention to the interview" or "arrogance", which will make the interviewer feel uncomfortable and bored. You'd better sit still during the interview. Although you don't need to be like an officer, sit still and let the interviewer see your self-restraint and quality.

Behavior 3: Cross your arms on your chest.

Some people explain that crossing your arms on your chest is a kind of "self-protection" and a kind of potential insecurity, but personally, this action is suspected of "arrogance", just like "leaning back". Cross your arms across your chest, which may mean "What are you doing to me?" This behavior reflects an attitude that no interviewer will like.

Behavior 4: Being late.

Although some interviewers will be late or find reasons to start the interview late, as candidates, they should arrive at the interview site on time or a few minutes in advance. Being late, no matter what reasonable reasons the applicant finds, the interviewer will not understand "being late". The applicant's explanation of "being late" will be considered as "making excuses" by the interviewer. In the interviewer's mind, being late also means that the candidate doesn't pay attention to the interview and is very casual. Candidates should preset the distance to the interview site, the road conditions and the factors that may lead to being late in advance, and make preparations in advance, such as the bus departure interval, the time required for self-driving, the congestion time and severity, and the time required for walking. The applicant would rather arrive half an hour earlier than be late because of thoughtlessness.

Behavior 5: Cross your legs.

Crossing one's legs has the same meaning as "crossing one's arms on one's chest", and the message conveyed is often interpreted by interviewers as disdain and indifference. Some interviewers even understand crossing one's legs as "arrogance" and "arrogance". Why do people who cross their legs let go as soon as the leader enters the office? Just can't show "arrogance" and "arrogance" in front of leaders. Especially when crossing your legs, the situation will be even worse. This is why interviewers hate crossing their legs. The legs are vertical and parallel, and "sitting in danger" can prevent the interviewer from getting bored.

Behavior 6: yawn.

Like "shaking your legs", people don't yawn when they are highly focused or nervous. Yawning means that the candidate is not in the interview state, does not care about the interviewer's questions, and yawns with his mouth wide open. Even if you cover it with your hand, you can't hide the tears squeezed out after yawning. When a candidate yawns, the interviewer will mistakenly think that the candidate is not focused, too relaxed and even a little "presumptuous".

Behavior 7: Play with the pen.

Some candidates, especially young people, have been playing "pen-turning" on several fingertips throughout the interview process, which is very skilled. In my impression, playing with a pen often makes people feel a little cynical. This unnecessary action may also be a release caused by nervousness, but after all, it is not an uncontrollable nerve but a deliberate action, which will make the interviewer feel uncomfortable and annoyed.

Behavior 8: rhetorical question.

Applicants are going to apply, not to argue, in order to be able to answer the questions raised by the interviewer satisfactorily. Even if some interviewers' questions make candidates uncomfortable, "a little reluctance leads to great mischief." Rhetorical questions are confrontation and questions, questions and questions, and interviewers will not like rhetorical questions.

Behavior 9: Don't pretend to understand.

No matter how junior the interviewer is, whether the other person really understands the questions asked can basically make a correct judgment. If the applicant does encounter a question that he doesn't understand, he can directly tell the interviewer, "I'm very sorry, I really don't understand this question." I didn't pretend that I didn't understand, but answered in a serious and stuttering way, trying to hide my "ignorance" on this issue. The interviewer looked at the other person and pretended not to understand, but he couldn't find it. He can only "listen to you for nothing", and naturally he will hate pretending not to understand.

Let's think about it and discuss those behaviors together.

The battle-hardened interviewers are all old foxes in the workplace, and generally have some research on behavioral psychology. They can judge a person's personality characteristics, the principles of being a man and the bottom line of ethics from a small gesture of a job seeker and an blurted mantra. Many people just ignored some small details, which aroused the resentment of the interviewer and finally failed in the interview.

So, what should job seekers pay attention to? What behaviors will cause the interviewer's disgust? I have participated in many interviews and interviewed many people. I think the following behavior of 10 needs special attention.

First, hypocrisy. During the interview, the interviewer will often throw a question that will trap you in the choice. For example, "the company wants you to go on a business trip immediately, and your father (mother) is ill. What should you do?" Do you answer that work comes first? No! At this time, don't pretend to please the company, but make the right choice honestly.

Second, arrogance. Interview needs self-confidence, but overconfidence is arrogance and easy to offend people. For example, talking about your status as a student union cadre or boasting about your achievements in previous companies will give people a flashy impression.

Third, rude. There are many rude places, such as being late for an interview. No matter what reason you have, you will leave a bad impression. Or it is impolite to greet or bow to the interviewer at the door, which will also give people an impression of being uneducated.

Fourth, short-tempered. Mao Mao is manic as soon as he takes a seat. He either knocks down a chair or knocks over a glass of water, so there is something wrong with being steady. At the end of the interview, if you are in a hurry to collect information or forget important certificates or materials, this is an interview taboo.

Five, lying. Lying and cheating are the most intolerable behaviors. Don't challenge the interviewer's intelligence with your intelligence. For example, when the interviewer asks you about the salary of your last company, don't be a lion. The interviewer is not stupid. You know which industry and what salary level.

Sixth, feel free. When interviewing, try not to be too formal, but not too casual. For example, when interviewing for a senior position, try to sit in the middle of the sofa instead of leaning on the armrest. When you want to smoke, just bear it. What great things can you do without such restraint?

Seven, rhetorical questions. Rhetoric is equivalent to kicking a balloon, and it is emotional and offensive to the interviewer. For example, "What do you think?" This rhetorical question is essentially a rebuttal, which will give people a feeling of arrogance, willfulness, uncooperative and out of control.

Eight, smooth. It is important to be alert in the interview. However, cleverness is not equal to wit. For example, if the interviewer asks you a dilemma, you can answer it skillfully. But you can't deliberately be ambiguous and pull a bunch of useless things.

Nine, show off. Many people have stumbled in this respect. I don't care if I have some spoken English at ordinary times. For example, when you answer, you say, "From a management point of view, I think you should …" or you are full of technical terms as if you are an expert.

Ten, excuse me. Some people, in order to express themselves or eager to express their views, will interrupt the interviewer when he is talking. It is very impolite to interrupt others, and many interviewers will shoot directly.

In short, remember one sentence during the interview: sincerity is more important than routine! Honesty is more important than wit! Low profile is more important than publicity! Steady is more important than impetuous!

2. For more workplace and management knowledge, please see the related articles in this issue!

Tell me about my interview experience. I was admitted to a public institution last year, and then passed the interview and entered the qualification review.

Four years after graduation, I haven't had a chance to take an examination of public institutions, and I'm still full of expectations. I hope I can pass the exam smoothly this time, my family is happy and I have a stable job. Of course, for a woman, the work within the system is very good, and I can also have a stable income.

I recruited two people for the position I applied for, and my written test score happened to be the second, so I think I must pass the interview smoothly this time. I'm nervous and excited. With my husband's support, I spent 4000 yuan on a four-day interview training course. For a clumsy person like me, it is really difficult for me to talk about the interview content easily in front of the examiner. I don't know what to say or where to start when I see the topic. But after four days of training, I have a general outline of the test questions and know what to say at the first point and what to say at the second point. I actually memorized the answers to some questions. Of course, this is the most stupid way.

On the day of the interview, there are always two interview questions, and the answer time is ten minutes. As soon as I saw a question with the same answer type as mine, my mind went blank, so I simply recited my own words and added some personal opinions. Although the interview is over, my interview results can only be considered as average. Fortunately, I passed the interview and successfully entered the qualification review with the second total score.

Through this interview, I summed up some experience. I don't think the interviewer likes the following situations:

First, dress casually and wear too much makeup during the interview.

Even if we don't wear a suit and tie during the interview, we should at least dress appropriately and generously. If you are a female candidate, remember not to wear heavy makeup, just paint light makeup, and boys don't need makeup. Just take care of your hair and beard and dress appropriately. This is the minimum respect for the examiner.

Second, don't knock on the door before entering the examination room, and don't say hello to the examiner after entering.

Be sure to knock on the door generously during the interview. Even if the door is open, you must ask the interviewer's permission to enter the examination room. Be sure to say hello and bow to the examiner after you go in, so as to get the minimum impression, right?

Third, interviewers generally don't like candidates who have been packaged by interview training institutions.

Candidates who have participated in the interview training class usually learn some skills from the training teacher, and they look stiff when answering questions.

These are some questions I can think of, and I hope I can help you.

Ordinary interviews are different from high-end talent interviews excavated by headhunters. Therefore, in most interviews, some job seekers' behaviors are disgusting, annoying or incredible and unreasonable.

The old ghost summed up several points from practice for your reference:

First, being too "equal" will show a "two-way choice" attitude. On the one hand, we do admit that the interview is an equal two-way selection process, but on the other hand, we must also make it clear that we are here to find a job after all! Our goal is to find a well-paid and promising enterprise. Therefore, in the interview process, your attitude, performance, figure, tone and so on are very important, so you must take good care of that "degree"!

Some job seekers make the interviewer feel uncomfortable because they don't come to the interview, but they seem to be "communicating"! From the point of view, this seems to be true. Originally, everyone just communicated with each other and made two-way choices, but please note that the interviewer may not have such a high consciousness, mind and pattern! Job seekers need to show the attitude that job seekers should have!

This is what job seekers need to pay special attention to! Never pretend! Don't show yourself that you are not worried about work and pursue equality in this way.

Don't say something like "this is a two-way selection process"!

Just like the process of sales staff developing customers, necessary respect, sincere language and demeanor are very important. Don't take a completely equal stance. He is the boss of the enterprise, and you are a small salesman. Don't make a mistake!

So this needs special attention!

Second, when enterprises ask job seekers to fill in the unified interview form, job seekers don't pay attention to it, and job seekers are often asked to fill in the unified resume interview form when they attend the interview. Many job seekers think that they have already submitted their resumes, and this behavior of re-filling the form is purely unnecessary. Under the influence of this idea, some job seekers are careless or simply fill in the form without paying enough attention.

This is a very annoying behavior of enterprises! Moreover, many job seekers also make a lot of sense: the resume submitted to you is very clear, so I didn't write it in detail when I filled out the form just now-reminding people that the interviewer should show them the original resume he posted online.

Be clear: no matter what you think! -you don't seriously fill in the form of enterprise unified requirements, which is disrespectful to the enterprise!

Third, when the interviewer asks the interviewer to introduce himself briefly, the job seeker prompts the interviewer in language: There is something on the resume-the interviewer will be very uncomfortable. As long as an interview is held, the interviewer will usually ask the job seeker to introduce himself at the beginning, or briefly introduce his own experience.

At this point, many job seekers make mistakes unconsciously: suggestive words are taken out of the language-resumes are written in detail.

Be careful: job seekers should be introduced! No friendly reminders! I have a high IQ! I know it's on your resume!

Fourth, the expression or tone of some questions raised by the interviewer shows that this question is contemptuous, this question is not up to standard, and this question is purely difficult for people. In the process of asking questions and communicating with job seekers, we can't accurately predict all the questions that the interviewer may ask. No matter what questions the interviewer asks, we should keep respect and full confidence in the interviewer.

Some job seekers, when hearing a question, may feel at that time:

How can you ask such a question!

This kind of problem, this is not purely embarrassing!

How can I answer this question without any preconditions?

What's the point of this question!

.......

At this point, the expression and language of job seekers are probably inappropriate! Arouse the interviewer's disgust and disgust.

Job seekers, please don't judge the interviewer's questions by your own standards! Your own evaluation criteria are not necessarily objective and fair!

5. Ask for a salary that is far from your previous salary. For example, when you used to work, your salary was 5,000 yuan per month, but during the interview, you directly asked for 1 10,000 yuan. The interviewer will probably find your request ridiculous! Unless you change the workspace! Otherwise, in the absence of the original salary, directly asking for excessive salary will lead to the interviewer's contempt or disgust.

Unless you can give examples to prove your ability and level in the interview process and convince the interviewer, otherwise, deviating from the original actual salary requirements is a "big pit" that is likely to arouse the interviewer's disgust and disdain. Dig yourself a big hole!

There is a reason here: because it is not necessarily the senior managers of the human resources department who interview job seekers for the first time, it is very likely that they are the employees of the general personnel department at a lower level! My salary is not high! Not so discriminatory! So, please don't make ridiculous demands on those low-level interviewers!

During the interview, there are many behaviors that make the interviewer very annoying, even annoying. The old ghost listed five points for your reference. We will continue when we have time.

The more you share, the more you gain!

Etiquette 0 1: No sense of time, late for the interview.

02: inappropriate clothes. Girls dress too exposed or casually, and boys don't pay attention to personal hygiene, such as not washing their hair.

03: sitting posture is not correct, and small movements are constant. For example, shaking your legs, hunching over, distracting your eyes, and constantly aiming.

04: Interrupting others at will, especially in the group interview, not paying attention and showing too much self.

05: After the interview, pens, papers or other items were not put in order, and they were not put in order.

06: Exaggerated makeup, girls wearing heavy makeup, or wearing too much perfume will give the interviewer a bad feeling.

07: I found that I was absent-minded, especially when the interviewer was interviewing other interviewers. Absence of mind is very impolite.

Expression 0 1: The expression is long and illogical.

In fact, the interviewer's work is very hard, especially in the recruitment season, and many people are interviewed every day. If the interviewer is very complicated in the process of expression, the lack of focus will make the other person lose the desire to listen.

02: Empty, empty talk.

During the interview. Interviewers often ask recent graduates: What's your experience in campus activities or corporate internships? Many graduates deliberately exaggerate their work experience in order to highlight their work ability, and the overall expression is too false and empty. For example, a senior student said in an interview that he had organized hundreds of activities, but in fact he only organized a dozen. Being caught in the other party's questioning and lacking sincerity is a taboo in the interview.

03: Lack of self-confidence and dare not express.

Many people lack confidence in the interview process, and the interviewer always answers questions simply. Because the answer was too simple, the other party didn't get the effective information he wanted to hear. At the same time, because the whole person presents an unconfident state, his eyes are often erratic and his voice is relatively small, and the gas field presented in the whole communication state makes people feel very weak, which is also an interviewer's state that the interviewer doesn't like very much.

Problem: 0 1: Pay too much attention to salary and get to the bottom of it. For example, if hr gives an interval, it is necessary to specifically ask what it is.

02: For the position that is not prepared for the interview in advance, ask the other person what position he is interviewing for during the interview.

03: Ask some questions that hr is inconvenient to answer, such as which do you think is better, me or the interviewer just now, which is a cliche.

[Summary] Five basic points that should be done in an interview: (1) Prepare in advance, including company information and job requirements.

(2) Dress neatly and easily, and be polite and generous.

(3) Express self-confidence and pay attention to eye contact.

(4) Having substance in words, seeking truth from facts.

(5) Pay attention to listening and express appropriately. No exaggeration, calm performance.

As an interviewer, Nan Ge doesn't like three situations in the interview. I hope sharing it can help you avoid causing the interviewer's disgust during the interview.

1. Speak ill of your former company/leader/colleague in the interview. Many people feel that they have finally found an opportunity to complain to a third party about the misdeeds of their former company/boss/colleague when answering the reasons for leaving or when the interviewer asks them to evaluate their former company/boss/colleague, so it is very Japanese. But think about it, you say happy, what will the interviewer think? Even if what you say is true, which company/leader/colleague will be perfect? Even if the company you interview doesn't have the problem of spitting, there will still be other problems. Your performance will make the interviewer feel that you lack inclusiveness. At the same time, if you encounter problems, you will only complain and attribute them to the outside world, and you will not know how to find reasons from yourself. Then you will still be like this after you come to our company. Why should the interviewer take the risk of recruiting such people to make trouble for the company and himself? Moreover, it is very important that you can't guarantee whether the so-called "shortcomings" of your leaders/colleagues exist in the person interviewing you. Once the other party has them, you don't say anything, and your interview is basically cold. Therefore, even if you want to talk about the shortcomings of your former company/leader/colleague during the interview, you should be tactful and try to suppress them first.

2. When talking about the project experience, only talk about happy results, and never mention specific work ideas and actions. There are often such people in interviews, only mentioning how big the project is and how successful it is in the end; Or how awesome awards you have won, and so on. However, only good grades can not let the interviewer know clearly what contribution you have made in it. In other words, how much does this grade have to do with you? Therefore, no matter how powerful, famous and successful the project you want to talk about, you can't just talk about the results, but also add your thoughts and contributions to it. Otherwise, it will only leave the interviewer with the impression that this person can fool, brag a lot and have no real skills.

3. Talk about salary too early in the interview. The average company has several rounds of interviews. Theoretically, the first few rounds of interviews are mainly a process in which both parties get to know each other to judge whether the job seeker matches the company/position. Although salary is one of the factors that affect the success of the final match, it is obviously not the primary factor in the early stage. Therefore, as an interviewer, you should focus on how to perform in the previous rounds, so that the interviewer feels that you are the right candidate. If this goal is achieved, you will have the qualification and bargaining chip for salary negotiation. Talking about salary too early will only make the interviewer question your professionalism and job hunting motivation.

If we can avoid the above three situations in the interview, it will be of great help to improve the success rate of the interview.

The workplace is a big river and lake, and it can go smoothly without strong ability. There are many doorways here.

First, it is impolite. What do you mean, impolite, casually dressed, girls don't wear makeup, their hair is messy, the answering process is casual, and they have no basic respect for the staff.

Second, there is no spirit. At such an important moment, the whole person is listless, soft and slow. Originally, the examiner was very tired after sitting all day, but there was also this kind of mentality explosion, and he strolled directly and gave a low score.

Third, it is long and smelly. Put yourself in others' shoes. You've been sitting all day without any entertainment or conversation, and the answers are all the same. It's boring enough to pretend to be serious over and over again. Your answer is long and smelly, your language is not fluent, your voice is not loud, and you can't repeat a few words repeatedly. Especially if you sign at the back, it is impossible to give you high marks and low marks directly.

Fourth, self-righteousness. Examiners are all veterans in the system, many of them are leaders, and even your future leaders are in it. Then you are self-righteous, unpretentious and boastful. Examiners want to laugh when they look at you, but they can't laugh in the examination room, and they get bored when they look at you. That can only vent their dissatisfaction. For example, from the beginning, I believed that through my efforts, the unit would make some changes and update the system. Son, you are you.

Fifth, others. For example, you can speak in vernacular Chinese, chat and swear like friends, for example, raise objections to the national injection policy, for example, perform grandiose acting on the spot, for example, tell people what to do. ...