For example, "Zhang San" drinks for women, and what responsibility should the onlookers who drink together bear?

If the behavior of hotel managers is that drinkers know that women may be sexually assaulted after being drunk, but they still help drinkers to drink together, then bystanders are suspected of the same crime. These drinkers may not know in advance, but those who continue to drink after discovering that the suspected sex offender has sexual assault intentions are legally one-sided criminals.

Then the responsibility of the bystander is different in different situations. The first is that bystanders and sexual abusers plan together in advance and try their best to persuade the victim to drink, which leads to the sexual assault of female victims. Then the person who persuades the wine next to him should bear criminal responsibility and belong to the aiding offender. The second is that drinkers have not planned together in advance, but they see sexual assault in the process of drinking, know the intention of the sexual assault, and continue to persuade the victim to be sexually assaulted, and they must also bear legal responsibility. However, if sexual assault occurs and is carried out after drinking, other drinkers will not be investigated for legal responsibility as long as they do not provide help and participate in sexual assault. So the key point of the matter is whether onlookers know that the victim will be sexually assaulted after being drunk.

According to the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), whoever rapes a woman by violence, coercion or other means shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years. If the crime of rape is established as a crime, according to the criminal law, those who play a secondary auxiliary role in the crime are accomplices. According to the law, an accessory shall be mitigated or exempted from punishment. Therefore, accomplices will be given a lighter or mitigated punishment under the penalty of fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years.

Nowadays, many drinking behaviors are packaged as wine table culture, which is not desirable. Moreover, as far as Ali Company is concerned, after the female employees gave feedback to the company, they didn't even give a substantive solution like kicking the ball, and they didn't respond and deal with it until ten days later, which triggered deep thinking of the public. Is it official protection or inaction? If the parties are not made public, will this employer continue to shirk each other? This practice will not make employees chilling.