Is it true that the United States dissects aliens? 1947 autopsy photos of aliens.

Until now, aliens have always been the object that scientists want to study Ossur most, but is it really true about 1947 when Americans dissected aliens? And if it is true, then have aliens already appeared in front of human beings? If so, why are some scientists still unable to find some whereabouts of aliens? Let's see if it's true that the United States dissects aliens.

American experts claim to have obtained 1947 photos of dissecting aliens.

According to media reports in Taiwan Province Province, another photo claiming to be an alien was exposed. Tom Carey, an American UFO expert, recently claimed that he had obtained 1947 photos of dissecting aliens, which were developed in the same year as the legend that UFOs and aliens fell in Roswell, New Mexico.

The British "Mirror" reported the day before yesterday that the photo was believed to have been taken in the mysterious 5 1 area of Nevada desert, and the bodies of aliens were placed on the autopsy table. The photo was taken from the film of dissecting aliens. It is widely rumored in the flying saucer world that flying saucers and aliens landed in Roswell on 1947, and a movie about dissecting aliens (goo.gl/SuHaao) came out on 1990, but it was later accused of being false, which is still controversial.

Kerry said that he got the Kodak negative of this photo from a female World War II intelligence officer in Texas. He asked Kodak historians to check and confirm that the film was developed in 1947, the same year that the aliens collided with Roswell.

?

Is it true that aliens were dissected in America?

There have been videos of dissecting aliens. But it has been proved to be forged.

Recently, a jaw-dropping piece of news was exposed in Sina.com, which was regarded as one of the greatest feats of human civilization in the 20th century, and the Apollo moon landing program of NASA was a scientific and technological scam. According to the report, 25 million Americans have supported this argument, and some related scientists have cited many "indisputable" cross-examination questions to expose this big scam. Some photographers in Europe have also raised many questions from a professional perspective. Obviously, this debate is worldwide, because the Apollo moon landing program was once an exciting past for countless people on earth, and even involved people's confidence in the future on our troubled planet.

Skeptics' views are most typical in Bill Kane who participated in the Apollo program. He even wrote a book called "We have never landed on the moon". His main arguments are as follows:

1 Without atmospheric refraction, the stars on the moon should be brighter and clearer, but they can't be seen in the space as the background in the moon landing photos.

In some moon landing photos, there is an imperceptible line between the close shot and the distant shot, which reminds people of the "fade-in scanning method" in movie stunts, that is, the distant shot is drawn first, and then covered with light and shadow.

There is something wrong with the light in the moon landing photos. It is not like sunlight shining on the earth, but like an artificial light source in the studio.

Besides Bill Kane, American physicist Hamlet also raised many interesting questions from the perspective of astrophysics and aerospace engineering. But because we only have common knowledge of general physics, we are not interested in Hamlet? Quot I dare not comment on physical problems. This will be another more interesting argument.

But I want to participate in this interesting judgment from the perspective of a professional photographer, and I will find a lot of fun from it. Because I participated in this discussion, I used our long-term understanding experience of the subject and related environmental imaging factors, and the source and basis of experience is practice. So the experience here is a sharp weapon for us to interpret the authenticity of these photos.

Let's analyze these photos.

The strongest voice of all doubts is: why can't all the photos of Apollo landing on the moon see bright stars? This question is actually very ignorant. As we know, all the images condensed on the photosensitive film are light and shadow structures formed by the reflection or emission of active light by objects in front of the lens. The intensity of light reflected, emitted (or refracted) by an object determines the light-dark contrast structure of the photosensitive film. And the tolerance of negative film to light intensity is afraid of frequency mode? What's the matter with you? ┕?? Jia Dan? What is this? Jia? ... 7 times the light level, the negative may not be recorded. Any lower, the negative will have no record, which is the "white version" in jargon. This characteristic of photosensitive material determines that its sensitivity to visual field is far less than that of human eyes. This is why we can usually perceive some scenes with the naked eye, but photos can't express them.

People who question that the moon landing photos can't see the starry sky obviously have no basic photography knowledge. On the surface of the moon without atmosphere, the sun is blazing, and the correct exposure combination is higher for the objects on the surface of the moon irradiated by the sun than on the earth (that is, the standard exposure combination of seaside and desert under clear noon sunshine is f16/1125 seconds /ISO 100). Even if it is an exposure combination close to the earth's environment, let's imagine how the brightness of moon rocks in the sun can be compared with the brightness of stars in the night sky. Anyone who has had night photography experience will have this experience-shooting a clear moon, the approximate exposure combination is F5.6/ 1/2 ~ 1 sec /ISO 100 (depending on atmospheric visibility), and the stars in the night sky will not leave traces on the negative. Even the brightest magnitude in the night sky, such as Sirius in Orion, needs to be exposed for more than 2 ~ 3 seconds, and the rest is the trajectory of the star. It is almost impossible to take a so-called starry photo without a super-large aperture or special device to offset the displacement caused by the earth's rotation. Because the sky is too dark. So far, we can only see the starry sky pictures with circular trajectories, and have never seen the same starry sky pictures as those seen by naked eyes. That's the reason (except for those taken by astronomical telescopes). The photographic environment on the surface of the moon is actually to put the day and night of the earth together in front of your camera. Up and down are two completely different choices, and you can only choose one of them. It can be seen that it is simply untenable to question that there is no starry sky in the moon landing photos.

?

Revealing the Secret 1947 American Anatomy of Aliens

The topic of aliens always interests people. Most people just say that they have seen aliens, but they can't produce valid evidence. However, in 1947, someone in Roseveare said that the UFO crashed and the alien died and was dissected and observed. Finally, the photos flowed out and became a sensational "Roseveare Alien Incident".

1947 On the evening of July 4th, around 0: 30, it was stormy over Roseveare, and suddenly a dazzling light appeared, and an unknown object roared across the sky.

Although it was only a moment, it was noticed by many people on the ground: herder William Woody and his father; A nun who prayed at night in a monastery (as evidenced by the diary at that time); A group of local archaeologists; The screens of the military's three ground radar stations also showed strange jumping spots.

At that time, the military only knew that the unknown object had landed in the north of Roseveare, and the exact location was still unknown. In the early morning of the next day, a large-scale search began and the nearby area was tightly blocked.

However, the first to arrive at the scene was the archaeological team led by Dr. Horton of Texas Tech University. At the scene, Dr. Horton asked a student to call the sheriff and the police. Soon, military personnel arrived at the scene. And asked archaeologists to swear secrecy. Nevertheless, the news media later reported that a UFO crashed.

The military took strict measures to ask the news media to change the news that had been sent out, telling people that this was not a UFO crash, but a balloon crash. Archaeologists were later severely questioned and threatened other witnesses.

According to an archaeologist, the crash was like a "wingless plane" with a "chubby fuselage".

Witness Lei Gesi Dale said in an interview 40 years later: "There is something like a corpse lying next to that object. It looks a bit like a biological corpse, not very long, only four or five feet at most."

The plane was inserted obliquely in the ravine at the bottom of the cliff, and the front end was almost smashed, and the exposed part made an angle of 30-40 degrees with the ground. The scene is full of debris.

A nine-member team fully authorized by the military launched an investigation. When they began to see strange flying machines and humanoid bodies like dwarfs, they were all very surprised and even terrible. Although I know that an unknown object has fallen on the radar screen, no one is psychologically prepared to see such a monster.

Three of these humanoid bodies, about five feet long, with big heads and big eyes, fell outside the plane, two of them were still inside the plane, and some of them were burnt.

Lieutenant Colonel Mackenzie of the nine-member team said, "We sent a special team to put the body in the body bags. They put on protective clothing and gloves. " To prevent any radioactive pollution. Then put the body in a box and carry it to an old ambulance. The body was first transported to Andrew military airport. Everything was done in an atmosphere of extreme secrecy.

After being cleaned up at the crash site, the bodies and flying saucers were removed, everything became calm. In the following decades, people kept asking questions, and many secrets came out, some said yes, some said no, but the official remained silent and kept his mouth shut.

48 years later, it is said that a 90-minute live documentary filmed by an 82-year-old American photographer with 16 mm Kodak black-and-white film was bought by British film distributor Ray Santilly for100000 dollars, and it was adapted into a video and sold to TV stations all over the world.

At this point, the "Roseveare UFO crash" was finally exposed and made public.

?

Analyze the truth of the alien incident

1995, the British UFO Research Association claimed that among the specially invited attendees, a British businessman named Ray Shantilly would bring a documentary filmed in 1947, recording the whole process of the UFO crash in Roswell and the dissection of aliens by the US military.

1995, the British UFO Research Association sent an invitation to UFO experts from all over the world, claiming that the British UFO Research Association would hold the 8th International UFO Conference in August 1995 at the University of Sheffield Harlan. After the invitation letter was sent out, it immediately attracted more than 600 representatives from Europe, the United States, Japan and other countries to attend. They were all attracted by the highlights of the conference marked on the invitation letter. The British UFO Research Association claims that among the specially invited attendees, a British businessman named Ray Santilly will bring a documentary filmed at 1947.

Ray Santilly is the general manager of British Moline Group. 1993, while studying music videos in the United States, Santilli accidentally got a real film about the Roswell incident from a retired photographer who had been employed by the US military. The 80-year-old photographer told Santilly that he was ordered to fly from Washington to Roswell on 1947 to shoot the documentary "UFO Crash in Roswell". The total length of this film is 9 1 min, and there are 14 volumes, which are 16 cm black and white films. Each volume is about 7 minutes, which is 9 1 minute, but the audio track is blank.

The appearance of this black-and-white documentary not only caused a sensation in the field of UFO research, but even shocked the whole scientific community. Everyone thinks that the UFO crash and the mystery of dissecting aliens, which have been controversial for 50 years, will be revealed before the end of this century.

But with the broadcast of the film, people have doubts about many details.

At that time, people raised some questions after reading it. There are military photographers in roswell. They are the first photographers who can keep secrets. Why did they call another person in Washington? This is unnecessary. Second, at that time, the autopsy in the United States was recorded in color and with sound. The third is that the photographer's technology is very bad, and it can't reach the level of military photographers at all.

The British UFO Research Association, the organizer of this international UFO conference, solemnly announced at the conference that it was willing to explore further because of uncertainty about the authenticity of the film. The purpose of showing the film at the meeting is to let it be tested. Therefore, in addition to inviting Shantilly to talk about his own experience of owning this film, the British UFO Association also invited experts from different countries and fields to analyze the details of this film.

Experts have come to the conclusion that the authenticity of this documentary is really questionable.

No one could have imagined that this mystery was made public by an unexpected person at the press conference 1 1 years later. In April, 2006, the media all over the world reported an amazing news: Ham Furesz, a famous British TV technician, admitted to the media for the first time that the film Dissecting Aliens was co-produced by him and several other colleagues. This blockbuster black-and-white documentary was not shot in the desert near Roswell, New Mexico in 1947, but in an apartment in Camden, North London in 1995.

Many farce about "Roswell Incident" has ended, but its real veil has not been lifted. Obviously, some people don't believe this statement.