Can robots complete artistic creation instead of manual work?

Nowadays, science and technology are relatively developed, and many intelligent robots can replace people's work, which can help us reduce a lot of burdens and provide a lot of convenience for our daily life. But robots can't replace artificial artistic creation after all, mainly for several reasons:

First, robots can only execute orders. Robots are programmed by people to move. It can only execute some commands, just like copying and pasting, and it has no brain at all. If there is something wrong with the machine, such as loose screws, they can't repair it themselves. Robots don't improvise at all. If they encounter something beyond their ability at work, then the robot will not deal with it.

Second, robots have no emotional intelligence. Although robots are smart now, some can even talk to him. But these dialogues are just made up by people, and there is no ability to think independently at all. Robots are even less likely to complete artificial art products. Everything they do needs templates to execute orders. Even if the things made by robots are exquisite, they have no artistic value at all. Because works of art are the painstaking efforts of artists and are drawn by strokes, the time and energy consumed by artists are priceless, and no one will be willing to spend money on robot works of art.

Third, robots are easily damaged. Robot structure is complex, and it will be damaged if it is not careful, and the maintenance cost of robot is very expensive, which is tens of thousands. Even if I have the money to buy a robot, I'm afraid I can't afford to repair it. It is impossible to expect him to make some handicrafts. After all, robots don't have their own aesthetics, and all their functions are artificially controlled.