Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography major - What camera is used for still life photography?

What camera is used for still life photography?

I bought a Fuji X 100 myself. I used a SLR for five or six years before, and there were dozens of lenses. I bought it around the National Day this year, and 7600 was used in a gold shop for a while. Let me answer your question.

Is the wide angle of 1.35MM enough? A friend said it was very small.

35MM is the focal segment closest to the naked eye, which is the so-called head feeling, and does not mean ultra-wide angle or wide angle. For Fuji X 100, what you see is what you get, which is very convenient for shooting. Wide-angle distortion is also difficult to control.

If you need to shoot a wide angle, you can use the panoramic shooting mode, which is equivalent to 360 fisheye, and there is no concept of not being wide enough.

2. It is an aperture of 2. Is F2 enough? If you take a portrait, the distance is about 2M, and the depth of field is not enough.

Aperture is not to say that it can't be made larger, but generally it should be designed as F2, in order to achieve the perfect spot effect and reduce the volume. However, the macro of F2 is relatively small, and F2.8 can be used, which is similar to many similar cameras, such as Leica X 1 Li Guang GXR28MM module and 50MM module.

The current price is more than 7000, is it worth it? Is it possible to continue to reduce the price to more than 5000?

Impossible, strictly speaking, 7000 can't buy licensed goods. The cheapest licensed goods are 7300, which is the price before the National Day. The national day rose by 300, which is the price I bought at 7600. Lycra X 1 hasn't lost a penny for so many years.

4. At the same price, is it possible for Fuji to launch similar wide-angle and larger aperture models?

No, Fuji can't launch similar updated products so soon, because it doesn't meet the positioning of this product, and it will only update low-end products frequently. Fuji is produced according to Leica's model. Fuji X 100 is equivalent to Leica X 1, and X 10 is equivalent to LUX5. There will also be a camera with a positioning similar to M8 M9, temporarily called LX 10, but considering the size and image quality, X 100 is already very good.

Is there any special advantage in sideline business?

Compared with SLR, it is portable.

This is the only advantage and the highest advantage. Imagine if you go climbing a mountain, take a two-kilogram SLR camera, a two-kilogram tripod and other things. Are you still interested in taking pictures? This is why X 100 sells so well. Relatively small size to obtain high quality images.

6. Will the fixed-focus lens be particularly inconvenient to use?

This varies from person to person. I am enough. After all, the head is used the most. Some professional photographers may not be enough, but there are also a few. I don't think photographers are limited by cameras.

Finally, say a few shortcomings.

1 macro is a gimmick and of little use.

Focusing is slower than mid-range SLR.

The volume is still too big, but it is much better.

In addition, if you don't want to buy X 100, I'll give you two cameras to consider.

1 Ricoh GRD4 white limited edition (very nice! ! ) 2: Sony NEX7