What is the difference between micro-single and SLR?

Question 1: What is the difference between SLR and micro-single? Which 10 point should I buy? Hello!

Sony NEX series is recommended for micro camera, which is also the most beautiful and thinnest micro camera with interchangeable lens.

It is suggested to choose Sony NEX-5R, which is popular in the market at present.

Reference price: 3850-4 100 yuan (with 15-50mm lens sleeve)

5500 yuan (equipped with 16-50mm, 55-2 10mm double-head floating machine)

NEX-5R has perfected and added many humanized elements on the basis of the previous popular model NEX-5N.

The difference between NEX-5R and NEX-5N:

1, 180 degree flip screen (NEX-5N can only be adjusted upwards by about 80 degrees).

2. Add a turntable to improve mobility.

3.WiFi wireless transmission function

4. The new video scaling is smoother.

5. The new head is more portable

The sensor has also been upgraded to a new CMOS that supports phase difference focusing, adding more buttons for easy operation.

Question 2: What is the difference between micro-single and SLR? Hello!

With more than 20 years of photography experience, I personally think that SLR is definitely better than micro-single!

Microfilm is a photographic system developed in recent years, which tries to perfectly combine the portability of the camera with taking high-quality photos. However, the micro-single system is not very mature at present, and the supporting lenses are limited. After the development of 135 years, the 135 SLR system is now very mature, with rich lens groups and complete accessories. Moreover, the entry SLR is getting smaller and smaller, like Canon 100D, which is said to be the smallest SLR camera in the world at present. You can look at it online.

As for the choice of SLR digital camera brands, only Nikon and Canon, other brands need not be considered. Because these two brands are traditional camera manufacturers, they have a long history and are among the best, and their products have high credibility. Although Canon is higher than Nikon in market share, it is neck and neck in quality. As for which brand to choose, the key is which brand's imaging style you like. Canon's imaging is soft and delicate, and Nikon's imaging is sharp and saturated (I personally prefer Nikon and use Nikon cameras, and the scenery is good).

If you are a photographer, just choose a camera first, which can basically meet your daily shooting needs. After getting familiar with SLR cameras, you can update high-end cameras, which may be cheaper. Digital products are updated quickly, so don't try to do it in one step. Buy new products instead of old ones when choosing (the reason is very simple, with the development of science and technology, the performance of new products is much higher and the price is not so expensive, especially for entry cameras). For example, the entry-level SLR Nikon D3200 and D3300 sets (18-55mm) are good, and the Canon 700D sets (18-55mm) are also good, which are the first choice for entry. The price of the kit is around 3000-4000. D3200 is more cost-effective, and the current price is around 3000 yuan, which is very worth starting with. If you want a higher grade, you can choose basic sets such as Nikon D5300 and Canon 60D, and the price is around 5000-6000. The performance and parameters are similar to the former, but the maneuverability is slightly better.

You can look at these websites and compare them according to what I said above: 1. Yi Rui. Com: a well-known website of photographic equipment in China, with comprehensive camera introduction and high reliability, you can know the latest equipment prices. 2. the color shadow is infinite. Com and hummingbirds. China's famous comprehensive professional photography website. From equipment review, netizen evaluation, photography knowledge, photography works, etc.

I hope my answer is helpful to you.

Question 3: What's the price difference between micro-single camera and SLR camera?

A SLR of the same grade, divided into miniature SLR cameras. Professional SLR is definitely much more expensive than professional micro-single. There is no doubt about it. It can be said that at the same price, the grade cost of SLR is definitely more expensive than that of miniature SLR. Because the internal structural materials will affect.

Volume and weight

The size of the SLR is definitely thicker, bigger and heavier than that of the micro-single, because every penny is worth a penny, and all the good things are heavy inside. For example, the lens is longer and larger than the micro SLR, and the internal photosensitive crystal is larger than the micro SLR.

function

Analysis from the perspective of photography;

Miniature SLR is small, light and beautiful, and is mainly used for family entertainment and leisure.

The SLR is generally from a rough photography hobby, which is widely used in family and professional business. You can play some apertures and some shutter parameters.

In short, play photography and choose SLR.

external

The SLR has been maintained? More solid and steady, the appearance is more powerful, and the shape is more deeply rooted in the hearts of the people.

The shape, style and color of the miniature SLR have injected a certain modern style, which can be said to be a commercial product integrating art and technology.

camera lens

Both micro-lens and SLR can be disassembled and assembled, but micro-lens has more lens selection space and better compatibility than SLR. The power of microlens microlens is that many old lenses can be reborn because of the smaller flange distance, as long as an adapter ring is added.

Compared with SLR, there are many lens bayonets, and different brands of bayonets are incompatible, which is a monopolistic development. Of course, SLR lenses are far more expensive than miniature SLR lenses.

Reflector plate

Between SLR and micro-single, it can be literally perceived that SLR has an "anti" word more than micro-single, and this anti is the meaning of reflector. The microchip has no reflector.

Reflector: As an auxiliary equipment in shooting, reflector is as common as flash. Using the reflector well according to the needs of the environment can make the plain picture more full and reflect the good image light sense and texture. At the same time, using it to properly change the light in the picture is also very good for concise picture components and highlighting the main body. Its function is to reflect the light of the lens and make it visible to the naked eye under the eyepiece. Its function is to focus.

However, the microchip has no reflector and can only be viewed in digital DC mode through the LCD screen.

Summary:

A, micro single small size, easy to use, wide lens range, suitable for ladies, ordinary families or amateurs.

B, SLR is large in size, heavy in overall weight, expensive in body and lens, easy to upgrade, and suitable for photographers and professionals.

It's all technical stuff I copied, and then I'll talk about things other than technical stuff. The microchip is really light, but it takes a lot of electricity. The SLR of the lens is definitely good, but for people who don't have high requirements on photo quality, it is enough to take notes. Another point is the micro-order, which sometimes makes you unable to take it. Women are ok, good-looking men should consider it, haha.

Question 4: the difference between micro-single and entry-level SLR! If you want to meet the needs of daily landscape shooting, Canon has 600D or 550D+ 18- 135 cameras. Because Canon's 18-55 has a short focal length, you won't feel it at first, but you will feel that the focal length is not enough later. Canon is more suitable for taking portraits, and then there is Nikon's D5/KOOC-0/00 or D3/KOOC-0/00+/KOOC-0/8-/KOOC-0/05 lens, which is a primary entry machine. Personally, I recommend the D90+ 18- 105 mid-range machine. Although it is an old model, it does not affect its powerful functions. Nikon's is more suitable for landscape shooting and sharp imaging.

Question 5: What's the difference between a digital camera, a micro camera and a SLR ... A camera with S or CCD as its photosensitive element is called a digital camera. Generally speaking, according to the size of photosensitive elements, people divide digital cameras into fully automatic digital cameras, digital SLR cameras and Quan Huafu SLR cameras.

Fully automatic digital camera, similar to fully automatic "fool" camera. There are general automatic digital cameras, so-called card machines; Fully automatic telephoto digital camera. Wait a minute. Its photoreceptor size is generally 1/ several inches.

Single-lens reflex digital camera, APS-C digital SLR camera, the size is generally about 24mm *18 mm; There is a full-frame digital SLR camera, the size is generally around 24 mm * 36 mm. The lens of this camera can be replaced.

According to the different framing methods, digital cameras are divided into single-lens reflex cameras, which are called SLR; Electronic viewfinder digital camera, so-called single electricity; Digital camera with viewfinder and electronic viewfinder; Paraxial framing camera, the so-called paraxial code-piercing camera. Wait a minute.

The micro single camera should be a micro single lens camera. The so-called miniature is that its volume is similar to that of a fully automatic digital camera; And its photoreceptor size is generally APS-C size; Generally, electronic framing is adopted. But because its lens can be replaced, it is called micro-single. Automatic digital camera can't change the lens.

Question 6: A great god can tell me, what is the difference between SLR and micro-single? Micro-single can be regarded as a portable DC with the appearance of a card machine and the picture quality close to that of a SLR.

SLR, we can regard it as a large camera with excellent image quality.

According to the current development trend, in the field of consumption, micro-single has the trend of replacing SLR in one fell swoop. A few years ago, a company conducted a survey of consumer groups. The question is "Why don't you choose to buy a SLR?" The answers mainly focus on the following items.

1. SLR is too big.

2. SLR is too heavy

This lens is too expensive.

4. SLR is too professional to use.

Simply put: big, heavy, expensive and difficult.

So a compact, lightweight, inexpensive and easy-to-use micro-single came into being.

Ha ha. Off topic. Briefly talk about the difference between micro-single and SLR.

At present, there are not many micro-cameras that we can afford, such as Panasonic GF 1, GF2, Olympus EPL 1 and Sony NEX3. NEX5, etc There may be an omission in Oba's camera, so I'm sorry I can't remember it clearly. The main differences between micro-single and SLR are as follows.

1. There is no reflector. The reason why the SLR has inverted characters is because it has a reflector, which is used to reflect the light passing through the lens. Some of it is used by human eyes to view the image, that is, the image we see, and the other part is reflected to the phase focusing unit for focusing. Micro-single cancels the reflector, which means there is no light reflection, so we can't see the scenery directly through the lens, or we can open another viewfinder, or we can take a viewfinder like digital DC and a viewfinder through LCD. In addition, the micro-single currently has no phase focusing unit.

2. Focusing performance, the focusing mode of micro-single is not phase focusing, but contrast focusing. Focusing speed will be slower than phase focusing, but in progress, the focusing speed has been greatly improved.

3. Image quality. Because there is no reflector, the micro sheet can be made very thin. For example, the flange distance of Sony's NEX series (that is, the distance from the bayonet to CMOS) is only 18mm, while the flange distance of Sony's SLR is 44.5 mm, which greatly increases the portability, but I had a heated argument with a large group of people in the professional forum of Color Shadow, that is, the flange distance became thinner. That is to say, when the incident light is projected on CMOS, the edge angle will become larger, which will affect the imaging. According to the existing CMOS design scheme, the effect of vertical incident light is the best. In other words, we have a very heated discussion about whether the image quality of the microchip will decrease after the flange distance is reduced, and we still can't draw a convincing conclusion. However, the smaller the angle of incident light, the better. This is true, so let's just think that the picture quality of micro-single will be better than that of single.

4. controllability. SLR is very maneuverable, because there are many buttons on the body of SLR, and there are two dials. Because the body of the micro-single has become smaller, it is impossible to place more buttons, and the layout of the buttons is not as comfortable as that of the SLR, so the handling of the micro-single is not as good.

5. Compatibility of lenses. The strength of the micro-single is that many old lenses can be reborn because the flange distance becomes smaller. Just add an adapter ring. For example, the flange distance of NEX is 18mm, and the flange distance of Pentax lens is 45.5 mm As long as an adapter ring with a thickness of 27.5mm is installed in front of NEX, NEX can use Pentax lens. Pentax's manual pan-tilt is very famous, so the appearance of micro-single saves a lot of old shots. The reason why the micro-single sells well lies in its powerful switching performance, while the SLR is basically unable to install the switching ring because of the large flange distance.

6. portability. There is no doubt about it. I can put a single point in my pocket at will, but I can only resist SLR, hehe.

7. Weight Many people will ignore this question, so will I, but the reason why I pay attention to this question is because I once carried a SLR on Mount Fuji. At that time, the backpack weighed about 8 kilograms, of which 3 kilograms were my SLR and accessories! I was really exhausted when I reached the top of the mountain. It is more important to have a portable small camera when traveling. So mm, choose the micro-single. ...& gt& gt

Question 7: Novice, is there a big difference between micro-single and SLR? Advantages of SLR

1. lens group. Although the micro-single can also change the lens, changing the lens does not mean that there are enough lenses to choose from. Compared with SLR, the new micro-single camera generally faces the problem of fewer lens groups. The quality and price of the lens are not considered here. Therefore, SLR still has an advantage in the choice of lens group.

2. Optical viewfinder. Because of the different design principles, the micro camera can't use the optical viewfinder, and the existing electronic viewfinder is not satisfactory.

3. Focusing performance. There is a difference between SLR and micro-single focusing system in principle. At present, SLR is still dominant.

4. A large number of accessories. For serious photographers, there are still many necessary accessories missing in the micro-single system.

Advantages of micro-single

1. Portable. Miniaturization and portability have always been one of the development trends of cameras. This is also the main reason why many people invest in micro-orders.

2. Portable. Because it is portable, you can carry it with you. Carrying a camera with you is far more useful than having a powerful camera at home.

3. Portable. The benefits of portability may be beyond your imagination. For example, the psychological pressure of shooting in public places, the vigilance of others to you, the burden of travel and so on.

4. The image quality performance meets the general requirements. While having the advantage of portability, the image quality of micro-single can also meet the needs of ordinary users-mainly online sharing.

How to choose:

If you buy a camera for home or photography, which is used for family photos, travel souvenirs, recording life and even personal creation, mainly shooting static scenes, then it is more appropriate to choose a micro-single.

If you have more professional or special purposes and needs, such as photos for professional drawing (magazines, photo albums), mainly shooting high-speed subjects such as animals and sports, then SLR is more suitable.

At present, the brand with the largest number of SLR is Pan Meini's family, that is, Pentax, Sony, Nikon and Canon, among which Nikon and Canon have the largest number, far greater than the first two. From the lens group's point of view, I suggest buying Nikon and Canon SLR, which is convenient to upgrade the lens, or if there are friends around who can change the lens.

Separately, Canon, the lens has a focus motor, which can automatically focus the whole body. The midrange 60D has a shoulder screen, which is convenient for adjusting aperture, shutter, ISO and white balance. A camera with a shoulder screen will be more expensive.

Nikon, the mid-range D90 began to have a shoulder screen and a fuselage motor. If a lens is used, the lens of AF-S will have a motor. Therefore, Nikon's low-end fuselage needs manual focusing when it encounters a lens without a motor, and automatic focusing is impossible. Choosing a brand only needs attention, but it doesn't mean that Nikon is not as good as Canon.

-

Entry model:

Canon:

1100d (18-55is) is about 2899.

Focusing at 9 o'clock, DIGIC 4, 12 are each 0 million pixels, which is Canon's cheapest SLR;

600D( 18-55 is II) is about 4099.

9 o'clock, DIGIC 418 megapixel focus, compared with 550D (discontinued, not recommended to buy) (flip screen is very practical), wireless flash, creative filter;

650D( 18-55 is II) about 4200 sets of machines.

9 o'clock focusing, central double cross, peripheral full cross focusing, digic 5+18 million pixels, flip touch capacitive screen, the latest generation of entry-level models, the focusing system is fully upgraded, and the performance is good. At present, the price has stabilized, and entry-level is highly recommended.

700d (18-55istm) machine cover is about 4899.

The label on the fuselage of 650D was completely changed, and there was no substantial upgrade. Just replacing the ferrule with STM stepping motor lens to better serve the camera, the price is too high. It is not recommended to start at present.

Nikon:

D3 100 SLR kit (including18-55vr) is about 2950.

14 million pixels, 1 1 focus. The same is true of EXPEED 2 ... >; & gt

Question 8: What's the difference between the photos taken by a micro-camera and a SLR? If you use the same lens and photosensitive element, there will be no difference in photos taken under the same conditions. The difference lies in operation and use. Micro-reflex is usually smaller and lighter than the corresponding SLR. However, personally, the electronic framing with slight reflection in framing and use cannot be compared with the optical framing of SLR.

Question 9: What is the difference between micro-single and small SLR? 1. What is a SLR? SLR refers to a single-lens reflex camera. There are two characteristics:

First of all, framing and imaging are done through one lens. Of course, most of the digital cameras we generally see now are like this. But it doesn't mean that they are all SLR.

Second, there is an independent prism reflection system, which is used to transmit the light emitted by the lens to the viewfinder through the reflector and prism to ensure that the image seen from the viewfinder is upright. When the shutter is pressed, the reflection system will immediately lift, making way for the light to directly reach the photoreceptor (CMOS, CCD, film) for imaging. When the shutter is released, the reflection system will be reset and immediately return to the viewfinder state.

In the film era, including now, SLR cameras are relatively large and heavy because of the reflective system, and they are perfectly combined with high-end large aperture lenses. So SLR cameras are generally high-end symbols.

Let's talk about micro-orders. In the high-tech era, anything can happen. People want high-quality cameras, but they don't want to be dragged down by bulky SLR cameras. So the manufacturer tried to cancel the reflection system, including prism and mirror. The signal received by the photosensitive element is directly transmitted to the rear screen through electrical signals to complete the framing. This reduces the volume without degrading the imaging quality. This is the micro-single, micro-SLR camera, also known as the mirrorless camera. There is no reflection system.

Question 10: What is the functional difference between SLR and micro-single? The micro-single has no optical viewfinder, and everything else is similar.