Did Apollo land on the moon?

This problem has been bothering me. I found some information, I hope it will help you. In 2003, the European Space Agency's "Intelligent One" probe flew to the moon. It is said that this time it also shoulders a mysterious mission: flying over the landing site of Apollo 1 1 spacecraft and checking whether there are any remains near the landing site. In American scientist Bill Kane's book "We have never landed on the moon", Kane pointed out many doubts about landing on the moon and concluded that the American "Apollo landing on the moon" plan was a shocking scam. Is that really the case? 1. Why isn't there a big hole caused by the airflow generated by the braking rocket under the lunar module? Because during the descent of the lunar module to the moon, the air jet from the braking rocket was wide, and there was no obvious "big pit". 2. Why are there no stars in the background in the moon landing photos? Are the photos of Apollo landing on the moon forged by the studio? (1) This is related to the exposure time. In order to make the close shot very clear, the exposure time of the camera must be very short, so that the distant view can not be seen clearly; If you want to capture the stars, the exposure time of the camera will be very long, but this will lead to a white scene in the photo, and the photo will be meaningless. (2) If the moon landing photos are to be forged in the studio, the studio area must reach 5,000 square meters, and more than one scene must be built. Moreover, it is very difficult to "fake" the sun, because sunlight is a high-intensity point light source, which cannot be faked under the existing technology. 3. In the process of landing on the moon, since the braking rocket ejected airflow and blew away the moon dust, why did it leave footprints? Because there is no air and wind on the moon, the surface of the moon has been tired of dust for billions of years. It is impossible for the airflow of the braking rocket to blow away all the dust, so the airflow of the braking rocket can blow away some of the moon dust and leave footprints. 4. Why do the shadows in some photos face in two directions? Because the surface of the moon is undulating, the shadow will bend when it shines on the surface of the moon. From a distance, the shadow will go in two directions. 5. The "atmospheric" pressure of the moon is 10 minus 12 mmHg, so why is the American flag flying on the moon? There is a crossbar above the American flag, so it can be erected; At first, scientists were very nervous to raise this plastic flag. Later, they thought of a way: put the plastic flag in a ladder, so that the plastic flag will become wrinkled when it is taken to the moon, and the elastic shaking of the aluminum flagpole seems to be fluttering because of the wind from a distance. When the astronauts came down from the ladder, they were in the shadow of the lunar module. Why can you clearly see the astronauts' feet stepping on the ladder? Because the astronaut in the photo is Aldrin and the photographer is Armstrong, Ah has already landed on the moon. As the closest celestial body to the earth, human beings have dreamed of landing on the moon since ancient times. In the 1960s, the American "Apollo Program" realized the dream of mankind for thousands of years. However, more than 30 years later, some people claim that the Apollo program is a shocking scam. The scene of Americans planting the national flag was shot in a Hollywood studio in the Nevada desert. A scientist who claimed to have participated in the Apollo program published a book entitled "We have never landed on the moon" (Chinese translation: "We have never landed on the moon"), and the author even pointed out many doubts about the Apollo program, thinking that the Apollo spacecraft only flew to the South Pole; The Soviets even questioned the authenticity of the Apollo program. Goldov, a Soviet writer, published a book entitled "The Biggest Fraud of the Century", which denied the Apollo program. In 2003, the European Space Agency launched a lunar probe called "SMART- 1" in an attempt to uncover the truth. Other doubts about Apollo's moon landing plan are: 1. There are only two astronauts on the moon. Why can you see these two astronauts in the photo at the same time? Who took this photo? This photo was taken by a camera outside the lunar module. 2. How was the image of landing on the moon recorded? How can the camera work normally when the temperature difference between the moon is so great? (You should know that the camera can only work at temperatures above minus 30 degrees Celsius) The landing point of Apollo 1 1 is located at the junction of Yin and Yang, which can be seen from the long shadow. The temperature in this position is neither too high nor too low, which is within the normal working range of the camera. Moreover, the South Pole and the North Pole on the earth are lower, and the camera can work normally in that environment, let alone in a special place on the moon. 3. Why was the Saturn V carrier rocket abandoned after Apollo landed on the moon, and even the drawings were not left? The first stage thrust of Saturn V carrier rocket reached 3469 tons, and NASA explained that the cost of Saturn V carrier rocket was too high. However, NASA's explanation still does not work. Since the cost is too high, why did the United States build 1969- 1972 Saturn V carrier rocket at one go? Now, an accepted explanation is that the cost of Saturn V carrier rocket is too high. It is really overqualified and wasteful to launch hundreds or even dozens of tons of loads with rockets with thousands of tons of thrust. Moreover, many technologies of Saturn V launch vehicle have been applied to the current space rocket, and the design of Saturn V launch vehicle is unreasonable. Some technologies are far behind, so there is no need to continue. The gravity of the moon is only 1/6 of that of the earth, so it is reasonable to say that astronauts should jump further. But in the documentary, the astronauts only jumped 3-4 inches, less than 1 meter. Moreover, after the documentary was shown at a speed of 2.5 times, it looked very similar to that taken on earth. What is the explanation? On the earth, the weight of the moon landing suit exceeds 100 kg. It is designed according to the movement of human body in weightlessness, and it is difficult to bend hands and feet. On the moon, although the gravity of the moon is only 1/6 of that of the earth, the moon landing suit weighs more than 20 kilograms, which makes it particularly difficult for astronauts to move. On the earth, the dust raised by cars is scattered all over the floor. On the moon, due to the small gravity, the dust raised by the lunar rover falls in a parabolic trajectory, which can be seen from the documentary. If we want to fake such a scene, we must create a large area of weightlessness on the earth, which is unrealistic. 5. Apollo 1 1 The lunar module of the spacecraft consumed a lot of fuel in the process of landing on the moon. Why is there enough fuel to return to the earth? The gravity of the moon is only 1/6 of that of the earth, and its escape speed is only 1.63km/s, so it needs less fuel. There is air on the earth, which produces resistance during the rocket's ascent. The acceleration of rocket speed is very slow. Without air on the moon, the rocket speed can be quickly increased to 1.63km/s, and less fuel is needed. Therefore, although the lunar module of Apollo 1 1 spacecraft consumed a lot of fuel on its way to the moon, it can still return to Earth. Although many doubts are explained, there are still many doubts that we can't explain. 1. It took Apollo 1 1 five days to return to Earth. The fuel of the rocket is liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen, and the fuel is injected into the rocket at the last moment before launch. Apollo 1 1 How to keep the fuel ultra-low during the five days from launch to return to Earth? This problem is difficult to solve now, let alone in the 1960s. There are many crosshairs in the photo, which are special for aerial photography and provide convenience for measuring the length and height of the object. It stands to reason that the reticle should be in front of the scene, but in some photos, the reticle is blocked by the scene. Why is this? Ⅲ. The astronauts in the lunar module breathed mixed gas of nitrogen and oxygen, but why did oxygen rush into the lunar module in the accident two years before Apollo landed on the moon? And it's not the staff who do the experiment, but the real astronauts? There is also a shocking point: these dead astronauts were deliberately murdered by NASA because they were not original! Ⅳ. After Armstrong returned from landing on the moon, he refused the request of TV interview and taking photos. Why? Although there are still many doubts that can't be explained, the mainstream view in the scientific community is that the "Apollo program" in the United States in the 1960s is true, and there are the following facts: 1. Most of the people who initiated the controversy were astronomy enthusiasts; 2. As many as 400,000 people participated in the implementation of the Apollo program, it is impossible for so many people not to "lie" for decades. The Apollo moon landing program was televised live, watched by hundreds of millions of people, and brought back 368 kilograms of lunar soil and rocks. Ⅳ. American media is everywhere. If the Apollo program is false, they can't be unaware of the news. American mainstream media believe in Apollo program.