Landscape architecture major wants to buy a camera, and take a fancy to Olympus u 10 10. How's it going?

A camera is, in the final analysis, a tool. The existence of the so-called "cost performance" depends more on what kind of people use it. If the machine can play to the extreme, then it should reach the maximum, which is the so-called "cost performance".

I thought, "Scenery, plants, etc. You may need wide-angle shooting, and sometimes you need macro. "For the lens of 38- 10 10, you can do it, but it takes a lot of effort and brains. If you don't want to spend more time in this area, you can consider choosing.

Among the limited machines I know, I think Ricoh GX200 is more suitable for this application, but it is a little more expensive than MIU10/0. If you feel the budget is tight, you can also buy an older GX 100. When shooting a larger scene, a wide angle of 24mm will be more comfortable. By the way,

Sp 1.gx 100/200 is well controlled, and it will not become very big when used, and it will be smaller when carried.