Is the flesh and blood flower guinea pig series true or false?

False, many friends said that the film Flower of the Flesh was shot in the whole process of a girl being dismembered alive, and the content was true. In other words, a girl was really dismembered in front of the camera. I feel creepy.

But when I finished reading it, I came to the conclusion that this is absolutely not true.

Reason 1: It is absolutely impossible for a woman to live until she is beheaded. A woman's hands and legs are cut off, and the arteries and blood vessels of her hands and legs can be cut off. Women will soon die of dragon blood, and it will never last long.

Reason 2: The color of plasma is bright red, which is also impossible. All the blood donors have arrived, and the blood is dark red, while the blood in the film is bright red. Of course, the blood in arterial blood vessels is bright red, but the bleeding mode of arterial blood vessels is jet, which can't flow out as calmly as in the film.

Reason 3: The murderer hid a large number of bodies at home, and the stench of the bodies must be "thyme". Neighbors will definitely call the police because of the stench, and things will soon be exposed. It is impossible to kill so many people. Of course, it is also possible that the killer lives in a house in the suburbs, which is another matter. From the perspective of criminal psychology, the murderer should dispose of the body quickly and never walk around the house. From the perspective of abnormal psychology, abnormal psychology is intermittent, and when he is awake, he will automatically turn to the category of criminal psychology, so it is unlikely to leave the body at home. Leaving the body at home as a trophy is something that only people in horror movies can do, and the possibility of it happening in reality is almost zero.

Reason 4: The last pink worm that crawled out of the corpse's mouth can be seen by anyone with a little common sense as an earthworm. Imagine that the maggots on the corpse are the masterpiece of flies, which makes sense. How did a large number of earthworms come from? Are they also "airborne soldiers" like maggots? Besides, do earthworms eat corpses? It remains to be seen.

Reason 5: If it is a record of the whole process of killing, then the lens must be recorded mostly: long lens, panoramic view. However, the traces of lens cutting in this film are obvious, obviously considered in advance, and the traces of the director are very heavy. Moreover, for example, when the murderer opened the "corpse room", the traces of lens assembly were obvious, and the editing points were also obvious, so the possibility of "live video recording" was very small.

Reason 6: The murderer covered the woman's body with a white cloth. The woman's "three points" were well protected during the whole process of dismemberment, and there was no dew point lens at all, which was very puzzling. It is understandable if the actress asks the director to protect her private parts. But please think about the scene at that time, killing and dismembering. How can we consider protecting the third victim? This is incredible!

To sum up, the author thinks this is a horror film with average shooting level, which is similar to the chainsaw series. It is unlikely to be a "live video". The above views are purely a family view. Smart netizens can definitely draw their own conclusions based on the film. If you are willing to communicate, I am all ears!

I hope you'd better watch less such sick movies.

Forbidden film

There's always a reason to be banned.

Movies such as Guinea Pig are only part of all the banned films.

People's psychology has a fragile side.

Even though I know he's fake

But it still has influence.

Japan makes this kind of film.

I just want to show my pervert.

In a sense.

He is poisoning the audience.

There may be some people who are psychologically fragile and have adverse reactions after reading it.

It may also trigger some people who are a little abnormal in the subconscious.

Become a real psycho killer

So I don't think this kind of film is worth watching. .

The above is purely a personal opinion. . .