After the wedding, which is better, Canon 600D or Nikon D90?

There is a simple reason.

Let's talk about the advantages first.

600D, with 1080P 25 frames of video shooting, and automatically leaned against the face in the camera focus.

The D90, a mid-range powerhouse of the previous generation, is used by many people, with good picture restoration effect and 720P video shooting.

disadvantaged

600D, full plastic body, not thick in hand, relatively light.

D90, metal frame, heavy in hand, with texture. But when shooting a video, focus directly on the highlights, which means that when you shoot a video, at the wedding scene, if there is light. It will be on directly.

You are shooting a wedding, I said it when chatting with a Baidu netizen. Sometimes shooting can't keep up, so you need to use the video shooting function to start video shooting. The function of 600D can throw a few streets. After all, the 600D video capture chip is a direct application of 5DII.

A few people upstairs said that D90 was good. Maybe they didn't really shoot wedding videos with D90 and 600D, but from the perspective of cost performance, I personally often shoot wedding scenes with the previous generation 550D of D90 and 600D. My shooting method is: take photos of newcomers in the hall with D90+ 17-50 Longteng lens. Because it is wide angle. But as long as there is a demand for video shooting, it will go to 550D, because 550D is too powerful to shoot video, much more powerful than D90.

It's not that you don't need Canon to take pictures, but that Canon didn't get off to a good start in wide angle.