What lens does invincible rabbit use to take portraits and landscapes?

1, novice 24 70 is the best, because it covers the most commonly used focal segments and has good imaging.

If you have photography experience, the depth of field of 35L is shallower, the imaging is better, and it is easier to produce good films. On the contrary, people who can't fix the focus well will find it difficult to use it.

1740 is mainly based on ultra-wide angle, and its imaging is slightly poor, but it is a very cost-effective choice. In terms of strength, 1635 is indeed above it.

2, the macro head can really take portraits, of course, this is not the first choice. Macro emphasizes close range, so the picture quality of static distance is higher; If you take a portrait, it may be too sharp to highlight the flaws on your face, and the focus in the distance may not be very accurate. Professional photographers generally choose 85L.

The focal lengths of 35 and 100 are completely different. Now young photographers like to take 35 shots of environmental portraits, and 100 can only take sugar water. . .

3, zoom is convenient and fixed focus imaging is good. An experienced photographer gave him a 35, and he could travel all over the world.

4. Personal Suggestions 24 105+35L

Speaking of taking scenery, I can take 35 shots, but I really can't show the momentum of that big perspective; 1635 is more suitable for shooting scenery, reflecting the momentum; Portrait is much worse than 35L, mainly because the wide-angle depth of field is deep after all, so there is nothing blurred. 24 shots of scenery is basically enough.

As for some people who say that 35 portraits are too close, it is completely wrong; If you shoot an acquaintance, just stand by and watch your side, which is convenient for communication; 100 has a long way to go.

As for telephoto, there is no uncomfortable lens that is not used. Please think twice.

Welcome to ask questions ~ ~ ~ ~ ~