Recommend a SLR camera for girls, which is better, Nikon, Canon or Pentax? I saw Nikon SLR D5200, D5300, D90 and D700, which is better?

First of all, the image quality of digital cameras nowadays is based on frames. Of course, the D700 Quan Huafu has the best picture quality. Although D700 is a little old, compared with the latest full-frame machine, the main difference lies in the control and CMOS pixels. First, although the D700 is not as good as the D800, the speed and accuracy of the D700 to the center of the circle are not bad, which is enough for tourism photography; Secondly, the high sensitivity of D700 photosensitive element CMOS is not as good as that of D800, and shooting at night is not as good as that of D800, but the sensitivity of 3200 can still be used. I shoot with Canon 5D2, and the highest sensitivity is 3200. Therefore, the high sensitivity of D700 is enough for ordinary players; Thirdly, although D700 has 6.5438+0.2 million pixels, if it is not used for large-scale advertising painting, it is enough to watch or print A3 photos on a computer screen. So the D700 is recommended first.

Secondly, D5200, D5300 and D90 are all good. D90 is an evergreen tree with good handling quality, but poor high sensitivity. D90 is too old to be recommended. D5200 and D5300 are both good. The picture quality of 5300 is the same as that of 5200, except for some digital data transmission functions. 5200 is more cost-effective. Among them, the so-called entry-level machine or mid-range machine, because the image quality is limited by the camera's CMOS, image chip and lens, the image quality is the same. The so-called entry, but the material is poor (such as plastic or metal), poor framing (five prisms or five mirrors), whether there is a shoulder screen and so on. D5200 is the best quality of Nikon C SLR, even exceeding D7 100. So 5200 is a more affordable choice, and the most important thing is portability. 5300 is not recommended, not cost-effective.

Although Canon 70D is also a new model, it focuses quickly. However, Canon's CMOS manufacturing technology is backward and its tolerance is poor. It is easy to die when encountering high light, and the dark part loses details. Judging from the evaluation results of DXO, a famous French camera evaluation website, Canon's CMOS completely lost to Sony's CMOS in dynamic range and color depth, so moving cards are not recommended. Although I use invincible rabbit. The Pentax camera is good. I recommend the K52S. First, Pentax, like Nikon, uses CMOS provided by Sony, and the quality is good. Sony is the big shot in developing CMOS (the 5200 uses CMOS developed by Toshiba); Secondly, Pentax's low-end lenses are of better quality. It is said that Pentax is a dog head and a cow head. Nikon's high-end lens is much better than Pentax, so if you don't burn the lens, Pentax lens is more suitable. Third, Pentax chips are more suitable for direct output. Nikon's JPG is not as good as Pentax's JPG. Pentax Green and Obalan are both famous. Fourth, Pentax has a small fuselage, good workmanship, dust-proof and drip-proof metal fuselage, and a variety of colors to choose from. So Pentax is a very good choice. I personally recommend Pentax.

To sum up, the full width of the machine is better than the half width, and D700 is the first choice; Secondly, choose Pentax K52S (in fact, Pentax K5S is very good, cheap and of high quality); Third, choose Nike D5200. Canon is not recommended. For reference.