Does the photographer have to use a Mac computer?

It should be said that it is not necessary.

Choosing apples is just following the crowd. If you choose Apple, customers choose Apple, and other photographers choose Apple, it means that everyone can agree on the display effect. Moreover, this is very important. Not only photographers, but graphic designers should often encounter such problems: the pictures that have been painstakingly made look like this on my computer, but they look different on the client/supervisor computer ~ This is terrible.

Apple's hardware may not be top-notch in the civilian field, but at least it is first-class and can meet the needs of most usage scenarios. Most importantly, all of Apple's device monitors, as long as they are products of the same period, can maintain consistency. This is not available in other brands. Even if the existing products such as Huawei and Xiaomi are of the same model and batch, the display effect is slightly different, but Apple has always maintained a high degree of consistency. I don't understand the principle, I only know that according to my observation, it is.

In addition, Apple's cost performance is actually very high. I don't know much about the market, so I can't give an example. Try to make a list according to the top configuration of mbp and see how much it costs if I buy it alone.

In short, if it is for work, 13 inch MBP is still the most cost-effective machine on the market at present, although it costs more than 10,000 yuan, which looks expensive and really expensive.