Is Leica the same as Hasselblad and Freescale?

Traditional Leica cameras are all 35mm portable cameras, which are famous for their exquisite manufacturing technology, durability and reliability, especially the unique top-level imaging quality of lenses, and are expensive. Leica in the digital age basically continues its style characteristics.

Hasselblad, as a classic medium format camera, belongs to the medium format camera like Freescale produced in the digital age. It emphasizes high pixel and excellent image quality, and is generally used in commercial photography, but it is not portable.

The common feature of these three cameras is that they are expensive. Leica is a high-end consumer portable camera, while Hasselblad and Freescale are commercial medium format cameras, emphasizing high image quality.

I am a Leica player. I have never used Hasselblad or Freescale. I think it's too stupid. It's hard to say whether the three brands are of the same grade, but they are all European products. Generally speaking, especially the lens quality is better than that of Japanese cameras.

I just bought an old Leica MP3 a few days ago, and I really like it. Take it out for a period of time every day. MP is the ultimate product of mechanical camera. But Leica is really inconvenient to take pictures and the operation is very troublesome. A lot of times, I can only guess and shoot, which is a bit lucky. I guess Leica M can play very smoothly, just like playing a Japanese camera. Hehehe ... will definitely be scolded by "Japanese powder" I'm really not good at taking pictures, and Japanese cameras are rarely used.

Finally, I want to emphasize that Leica is really poisonous, and you will prefer cameras to taking pictures.

Freescale, Hasselblad and Lycra belong to different fields, so don't compare them together. I am currently using Freescale, Hasselblad and Nikon, which are applied in different photography fields. I can give an answer about the applicable fields.

Hasselblad 503cw is the main force of early use, with Freescale's early H20 digital back. Because the fire line is connected to the computer power supply and data transmission when shooting, it can only be shot on the set. In the early days, the native ISO of ccd can be 50 or even lower, and the film texture is very delicate, but there is no way for high sensitivity. In this period, the middle frame system must cooperate with the flash to achieve the highest film quality. In those years, this system made great contributions to my career, and it is still in service, and the effect in the shed is first-class.

A few years ago, Freescale camera system and related equipment were updated: Freescale FX body, IQ2 50Mp back and several Schneider hoop lenses. The computers in the whole design department have all been upgraded to workstation level, and the lighting system has also been upgraded from Ailinglong to Baofutu. Such a large-scale upgrade is to meet the needs of the new era and customers. Personally speaking, it is from indoor to outdoor, a new world, a new world. In terms of customer evaluation, after the upgrade, the shooting rate of photographic works has been greatly improved, and great tolerance has brought great improvement in the later period, which is a qualitative leap for the whole company.

In fact, Nikon systems have not been upgraded for a long time, and they cannot be applied to real commercial photography. They just play some small tasks in the fields of recording, tidbits, meetings and activities over the years.

As for Lycra, well, that's feelings. If it is a benchmark from personal hobbies and personal photography art, it is useless from commercial photography.

This question is a bit strange. What is a grade? In terms of price?

In fact, although these three companies are all camera brands, their areas of concern and historical growth routes are different. Leica is the top of 135 camera, Hasselblad is the top in the field of medium format, and Freescale should say that the digital back is more powerful. In addition, many Leica are used for collection, which are generally used by photographers. Hasselblad and Freescale are often used in commercial photography, and their performance is definitely better than Leica.

Leica has also produced medium format S, but it is only a product line under the brand, not the main product line. It is definitely not possible to compete with Hasselblad alone.

You said two questions.

1, brand comparison, and medium format comparison.

Brand positioning is different. Leica focuses on 135 format, taking paraxial camera as a classic, modern sl, Q and so on. Electronic automation is high, and there are some half-frame laptops and A series, mainly making half-frame 120 cameras, such as s007.

Hasselblad and Freescale are basically the same, except that Hasselblad has an all-in-one machine, 135 OEM, with a back, and Freescale only makes the back.

Leica's highest price is 135 system. High pressure and good playability.

Hasselblad used to be very powerful and basically ruled the field of 120. Later, after several changes of hands, the sound has gradually disappeared. Freescale is getting stronger and stronger, and its price, products and system construction are the most perfect and top-level existence.

2.s007 (half frame 120) and Hasselblad Freescale products.

S series products are the highest quality products of Leica. Its effect is basically the same as that of Hasselblad's and Freescale's 4433 sensors (Freescale no longer makes this specification). From the sense, S system is slightly worse than Freescale's 4433 system (better lens).

At present, Hasselblad has a 4433 all-in-one with 50mp pixels, 5440 Quan Huafu with 645 pixels, and 100mp pixels.

At present, Freescale mainly produces 5440 specifications of 100mp and 150mp products. In terms of pixels, Freescale has the best picture quality. In addition, Hasselblad has fallen far behind in the construction of Freescale system, and Freescale is still slightly better than Hasselblad in the same level.

In terms of price (with lens), Leica S series is about 65,438+10,000 yuan, Hasselblad half width is 4-5w, Quan Huafu15-/kloc-0.80 million yuan, Freescale is about 27-300,000 yuan, and150mp300-350,000 yuan.

These are just approximate figures. I don't care about the price for a long time. )

Hasselblad and Lycra are basically the same grade, but there is one difference: Hasselblad focuses on medium format, Lycra is Quan Huafu, and C format is added with card machine. Freescale is almost successful. I played it, but it was not bad. At first, it was mainly used to make Hasselblad's back, and later I made the whole machine myself. The technology is not bad, but the reputation is slightly less. Worth buying and playing. Goodbye! [Handshake] [Handshake] [Handshake] [OK]

If the price is used to determine the grade, Leica is the highest, and there is no one. In the 1970s, the price of Leica Black Paint M was unmatched. On Leica M's workmanship in 1950s, although modern and modern Leica silver-black lacquered lenses are also good, they do not belong to the uncompromising principle of Leica Peak, but are full of commercial ideas and compromised industrial design.

In terms of image quality and commercial shooting, Hasselblad's performance is definitely better than Leica M and S. However, Hasselblad and Leica S are tools, not collectibles.

A concise and clear answer! 135 stands for 120 format camera! However, Hasselblad's presence in 120 can't be considered as a top-level existence, and there are many brands that are stronger than it! The target customer groups are different, so horizontal comparison is not good! After all, Leica has a history of 100 years, and Leica's lens can be measured by the inflationary money market, an appropriate financial product! Leica balances portability and image quality to the extreme. Pure black and white photos are the essence of Leica. Playing Leica is playing with its culture! Fortunately, I also play Leica! The following photos were taken by myself.

The positioning is different and cannot be compared together. Hasselblad and Freescale are both professional cameras in medium format, and their main customers are advertising photographers, fashion photographers and landscape photographers to meet their needs for large-size output. The high price, volume and weight determine that it is basically a production tool. Some of them have a high fever and are rich, and they are used as toys, but rarely. Lycra's customer base is mainly photography lovers, playing with feelings. Because the word Lycra is almost the dream of all photographers, why do you have to do your own homework?

This question is very strange, just like BMW M Series and Porsche Cayenne (regardless of the price). The former is "personally" driving, and the clutch, gear shift and brake throttle are all performed subjectively by the driver; The latter is to "personally" hand over control to the car.