Which one has better employment prospects, environmental art or photography?

Personally, I think employment in environmental arts is better, while photography is more difficult.

Because environmental art is needed by the public, mastered by a small group, and has high professional requirements;

Photography is different. The popularity of digital cameras and the popularity of amateur photography have all increased to a certain extent. It hinders employment in the industry.

Not long after I graduated, many of our middle school photography classmates switched careers to editing or graphic design. Photography became a hobby, while most of those who studied environmental arts were still working hard in the industry. Even if they changed, they were still in design. A kind of.

But I believe that if you are capable, creative, and have opportunities, employment will be good!

One more wordy sentence - don't compromise on your dreams, stick to what you like!

I love photography, and my news work won the third prize in the country, but I have never encountered a good opportunity...