SLR camera or DV, who makes clearer video?

SLR is mainly aimed at photography, dv is mainly aimed at photography, and it is better to shoot video with dv. Now SLR can shoot video, but it is definitely not as good as dv, mainly because of continuous shooting's ability. The shooting time of a SLR camera is very short, so I bought a SLR for photography.

There is also a camera whose autofocus function is not as strong as DV, which is slow and difficult to use. In addition, the camera frame is relatively large, so the depth of field is small and it is easy to lose focus. DV frames are small and the depth of field is particularly large. No matter what the focus is, it is real.

In terms of recording time, DV can record for dozens of hours continuously, and the camera can only record for a few minutes. If you want to record a class, you can record it for thousands of hours without worrying about using a camera. Press the record again every 12 minutes, prepare several CF cards, and type a lot of data on the computer every day. ?

Extended data:

One is the hand-held performance. The ergonomic design of the camera is not designed for long-term hand-holding, so it will be tiring to shoot for a long time and DV operation will be easier. DV is basically shot with one hand, so the camera will have two hands. ?

There is also anti-shake, camera anti-shake, ok, but some DV anti-shake is much stronger than the camera, such as Sony DV, which basically does not shake in any way, which is too powerful.