The first time I shot a film with a SLR, the effect was very poor. Why?

Hehe, it seems that the most basic concepts are not clear.

Obviously underexposed! (Some photos)

To tell the truth, the most basic phenomenon-the film is gray, with no contrast, low contrast, not full color, coarse particles ... typical underexposure.

How can it be overexposed? Overexposure is a "thick film", which leads to a large film contrast. The sky and white parts look very pale, sometimes the color will look too bright, and people's skin will look very white, too white ... this is a typical overexposed film.

I believe there is a mistake on the first floor.

There are many problems involved in the later stage of film photography:

1. What brand is your movie? Quality assurance? Is it overdue?

2. Your development-where do you develop the film? Are the medicines in this shop fresh?

3. Your photos-were uploaded by scanning photos or scanning negatives?

-

Look at these two photos, number 738500 13, number 738500 1 1. The whole picture is gray, and trees, people's hair, skin and clothes in the distance are covered with gauze.

There are some photos, the sky is blue sky and white clouds. If it is overexposed, it is impossible to shoot blue sky and white clouds. I believe the first floor understands.

I also doubt the quality of the landlord's film.