Who is better in sharpness, color reproduction, dispersion and imaging? Between Nikon original small steel cannon and Sigma Black 5 Belt (70-200os)?

1 There is a big difference between anti-shake and non-anti-shake, XGP is basically kidnapping;

2 focusing speed, ok if the XGP body motor is strong, otherwise it is more worry-free;

3 XGP focusing is obviously not as quiet as Xiaohe. In some occasions, such as meetings and performances, there are still requirements for this.

I think XGP is rich in color, but the dark part is easy to turn yellow. River 5 is not generally light, but it is also quite thick and tasty under the condition of insufficient exposure. It should be said that the two are half a catty. If it weren't for underexposure, Xiaohe 5 often needed a little contrast and saturation in the later stage.

5 Xiaohei 5 thinks it is more exquisite than a small steel gun.

I have never taken a newspaper, so the sharpness is not comparable. But XGP has a bigger contrast. By the way, sharpness is equal to the derivative of brightness with respect to space. To put it bluntly, it is just to see clearly, and whether the details are rich or not has nothing to do with it.

Black 5 Jiao Wai is weak.

There is nothing to say about 8 XGP's works. If it falls on your floor, it is estimated that your first concern is not the lens but the floor.

9 On the handle, XGP is very good and very MAN.

I think if there is no original plot, Black 5 is more practical for ordinary people, but XGP is more durable and valuable.