Which is better, a 90-dollar macro lens (Nikon bayonet) or a Nikon 105 macro lens?

1. There is a popular saying in photography ~ There is no weak team in macro, which means that if you just shoot macro, the macro head is very helpful ~ Longteng 90 macro is one of Longteng's experts ~ The sharpness is great, the old Longteng 90 macro has no anti-shake, and the focus is still long nose, which is ugly, but it is still a good head with outstanding image quality. Later, the new 90 macro looked good and added VC anti-shake.

2. 105/2.8G I have this macro lens, which is my third shot and one I like very much. I used it to shoot macro, portraits, and even humanities-! But the focus speed of portrait and humanities shooting is only a matter of a while. The color of this lens is very good, and it is an easy lens to make a good film. Sometimes macro color doesn't even need post ~ ~ but it can only shoot portraits, which is better than 50/ 1.8D, and this head is a lens that I won't sell ~

3. I also compared it with Longteng 90 Mini. If you just shoot the macro, I can only say that the Longteng 90 macro is very good, using 90 and 105 to shoot the macro respectively. I can't even tell which is 90 micron and which is 105 micron. The price is also slightly cheaper than 105, so I think it's good to take portraits with these two lenses, but if you buy 85/ 1.8, it's easy to take portraits with these two lenses.