Does G9 have full manual support? Besides adjusting the aperture shutter, can I focus manually?

In design, G9 can focus manually, but it is not realized by rotating the focus ring like a SLR lens, but by controlling the turntable. Focusing speed is slow, accuracy is not high, and it is awkward to use, so it is generally not used like this. Upstairs, it is inaccurate to say that "the focal length of all models is adjustable", and some models even have to focus manually according to the preset distance, which is even more indecent.

You know, accurate and convenient focusing plays an important role in photography, which also proves the gap between DC and SLR from another angle.

In addition, manual operation refers to the manual operation of the project, and the fully manual adjustable projects are as follows:

ISO, color temperature, picture format, shutter, aperture, exposure compensation, focus selection, metering mode, flash control, etc. The specific usage method cannot be expanded here because it is too complicated. You can look it up online.

Panther2-A 1 answer:

You said that "manual aperture and shutter are more accurate than aperture priority and shutter priority", where do you start? Unless your eyes are an exposure meter, how do you know how much aperture and shutter are needed in the current environment? If there is no separate exposure meter, can you give the correct combination of aperture shutter accurately by experience? This is impossible, so aperture priority or shutter priority is generally given priority. After metering, the exposure compensation will be increased or decreased according to the specific situation (if compensation is needed), and the full manual mode of aperture shutter will only be used when taking photos with equal exposure at night.

In addition, priority should be given to ISO in night shooting. Only by using tripod and lowering ISO can we get good image quality. Access to the shutter will certainly be obtained at the expense of ISO.

Reply again:

I never said that photography must do this and that, otherwise it will spoil or fail to make a good film. Surprises are also common.

Just like playing football, photography needs inspiration, but please remember that inspiration needs to be based on accuracy. Without accuracy, inspiration is like a castle in the air. For example, in football, you said, "I can shoot a ball that surprises everyone without looking at the goal." How many goals did you score under such circumstances? More sure than shooting clearly at the door? So how many professional players like you shot without looking at the goal in this European Cup? I don't mean to be sarcastic, I just want to express a concept: feeling, inspiration, inspiration and so on. It is possible to succeed, but the proportion is very small. Solid and accurate is the reliable way to success.

Let's talk about photometry. Even ansel adams, a master who has played with cameras all his life, lives on a Weston exposure meter. Without it, he can't cope with the ever-changing light.

If you play too much, you will really have a rough judgment on the light. It is very rough and inaccurate, but it does not mean that it is inaccurate. Sometimes it is just right and the exposure is right. But how much hope can this coincidence place? Don't say that it is estimated by eyes alone. Even the metering system in the camera is based on reflected light metering. In some cases, this measurement method is still insufficient, and a more accurate incident exposure meter must be used.

Finally, these words didn't mean to offend paul8749. They just want to say how important accuracy is to photography, and accuracy is a necessary condition for almost any industry.

The final answer:

This discussion is very interesting. In fact, our views are not very contradictory, but you emphasize inspiration and I emphasize accuracy and foundation. But what needs to be explained is that you misunderstood me, that is, I never thought that I could become a master with technology, and technology is only the necessary foundation for becoming a master. In other words, if a master can't even make accurate exposure, he can't be called a master. Just like a player can't even shoot in the door, it is even more impossible to shoot in by inspiration. If he passes the exam, he is lucky and cannot be repeated.

In addition, the inspiration comes from years of repeated training and oil painting. Without three or five years of sketching skills, it is almost impossible. Then the sketch pursues precision, and the process is extremely boring. According to you, this is a waste of art? It is this seemingly boring and useless sketch that is the basis of all graphic behaviors. It is impossible for a person with a weak sketching foundation to draw a famous work with an inspiration. China players even lack the ability to stop the ball under their own feet, and it is impossible to accurately pass the ball to their teammates. So even if he was inspired by stopping the ball and passing the ball, he didn't have footwork skills to help him realize this inspiration.

So my final conclusion is: accuracy, well-trained and solid are the necessary foundation, and inspiration is the crystallization of this foundation. Even if you can't generate inspiration, the foundation is still there; Without foundation, inspiration will disappear completely because it can't be realized.