Beginners in photography are struggling to choose a camera (for more than a year), and ask experts for guidance to buy a high-priced SLR camera without falling behind! Bare metal budget 6000

It's actually very easy to choose. According to your experience in using SLR and the fact that D90 is too small, you can give up D5 100 directly, because it is too small, and you will be depressed after 50 days. As for D90, it is the same age as 50D, and its performance is not as good as 50D, so it can be eliminated. In the end, it seems that your choice is these two, 50D and D7000.

What are the advantages of 50D compared with these two machines? There may be only two small advantages:

First of all, the price, because the old model has been discontinued, and the performance upgrade of 60D is half a level behind (except for the plastic case and continuous shooting speed, 60D is better than 50D), and it is difficult to clear the inventory, so the inventory you get will definitely be very cheap. In contrast, in the mid-range SLR currently on sale, D7000 is a product popular with players, and its performance is also very well received. Then it is obvious that its price will never bottom out, and it will be relatively expensive.

The second is all metal, which is a complex. Many people have it. Although being big and heavy is not a good thing, many people really pursue it. This is the only advantage of 50D over 60D and D7000. Although D7000 is semi-metal, to be honest, the texture and weight of metal are very general (I am a D7000 user, and this feeling is obvious compared with D300 and D7000). Even compared with plastic D90, it is slightly cold and heavy.

In addition to these two points, it can be said that 50D has completely aged in the rapidly changing world of digital SLR. When cmos pixels are almost the same, high inductance is lost to D7000；; Compared with D7000' s 39-point focusing system, the 9-cross focusing system is also quite weak (this is a very obvious gap between sports shooting and bird chasing); Compared with D7000' s 20 16-point metering system, the metering system in area 35 is more shabby (this is the highlight of D7000, and it is the strongest metering system with SLR within 10,000 yuan); Because of its age, 50D still lacks the popular high-definition video function of SLR, while D7000 not only has 1080p high-definition video recording, but also supports real-time detection and focusing, which enhances the practicability of this function and saves several streets for 50D children's shoes. ......

Well, I think it's a good choice. If your budget is really tight, then 50D is not bad, at least the camera performance and image quality are ok. But if you have enough budget, then D7000 is definitely a more suitable choice. Not because I am a D7000 user, but really good.

About the matching of lenses:

If you go for 50 days, then at least 18- 135 and Xiaotou 18-55 are not needed, because it is really bad, and the unkindness of the C family to the dog's head is fully demonstrated (poor workmanship+perfunctory materials+purple edge phenomenon+poor sharpness).

Option 1: If upgrading the whole set is not considered, then 15-85 is the most suitable permanent hook. Good imaging and perfect focal length are all good. Plus a 50mm 1.8, 15-85 is a good match.

The second configuration: this is a common configuration method at present, that is, the full-width ultra-wide angle 17-40 is used as the hanging head, and then the focal plane is completed with a 55-250. 17-40 can prepare for the comprehensive upgrade in the future, and it is also a red circle, which is more attractive. But I personally don't recommend it. First of all, its 17 terminal is not wide and common in C format. Secondly, the 40-end is too short, and the constant aperture of 4 is not large, which can be said to be an embarrassing head. The only advantage is red circle imaging, but it has no advantage over 15-85. So if you don't plan to upgrade for the time being, it is not recommended that you configure this setting.

The third is to go to the vice factory. Longteng B005 and 50D cooperate quite well. The ever-changing large aperture, excellent image quality and affordable price of around 3000 are as cheap and sufficient as 50D (laughs). Very recommended, if there is no original factory complex, it can be matched completely, and it also saves the trouble of changing the aperture to fix the focus.

The fourth type is 17-55, but the price is more expensive, so it is not a red circle, and it is really uncomfortable to use. And if the fuselage bought 50D, then obviously the funds are not enough, so I won't elaborate on this, and it is not recommended at all. . . . . . .

If you go to D7000, you will have more choices, and you can meet the demand with less money.

The first scheme: this is my most admired scheme at present, which is to collect a second-hand 18-70. The materials and workmanship of this head are quite good (three ED lenses, above 16-85). It is the crown of a dog's head, with first-class color imaging and a slightly larger maximum aperture than ordinary dog's head. (The farthest 70th end is 4.5) With a 50mm 1.8, almost all kinds of scenes can be handled, and the picture quality is close to that of a bull's head. At the same time, these two heads add up to less than 2000 yuan, which is very economical. The money saved in this way is enough for you to raise the 50-day budget to D7000, hehe.

The second scheme: the standard scheme, D7000 uses a 16-85 bull's head, and the picture quality, workmanship, materials and performance are very balanced, which can be regarded as the standard head of D7000. The only regret is that there is no constant large aperture, and an extra small fixed focus is still needed to meet the special creative needs.

The third plan: go to the vice factory! Longteng 17-50 and Sigma 17-50 are very good choices, with large aperture, good focal length and reliable image quality. The deputy factory director has a plenty of cost performance, but what is lacking is the workmanship and stability of the original factory director. It depends on your idea.

The fourth scheme: 18- 105+50 mm1.8, which is the most standard combination. Nikon18-105 kills Canon 138 in all aspects of workmanship and imaging. It's not as good as 18-70 and 16-85 as I said earlier. Although the gap is small, if it is permanent, it may lead to daydreaming about better movies. So I suggest taking a small step, either buying a new calf of 16-85 or an old dog king of 18-70. So my set of18-105+50 mm1.8 is for your reference only.

PS: Nikon also has a super bull's head and a half, 17-55, but the price of more than 9000 is too expensive. If you can get it, you don't have to regret it If you can't, don't force it. After all, Longteng 17-50 and Sigma 17-50 are very close to it.

To sum up, I discussed the fuselage in the first part Obviously, your final choice will be 50D and D7000 (D90 is not as good as 50D, D5 100 is too mini, so it will be eliminated directly). Then you should know which one you like. After all, the machine is easy to choose, but the lens is difficult to choose. Through my discussion of the two shots that are suitable for you at present, you may have more judgment. Personally, I still recommend Nikon under this budget. Nikon really spares no effort to be kind on camera at this stage, and Canon only gives the good ones to the red circle. It is very stingy, unkind and unpleasant in the workmanship, materials and research and development of the dog head.

My feeling is that if your budget is really tight, then 50D is good, but I think the money you save will be spent on the lens. If you have enough budget, then the D7000 is definitely a better choice. Coupled with Nikon's kind and high-quality dog head, you can save some money on the lens to make up for the extra money spent on the fuselage. As for the final choice, it's up to you, but the digital "buy new instead of old" is reasonable, so you should consider it more.