Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography major - Arguments supporting the truth of the Apollo moon landings

Arguments supporting the truth of the Apollo moon landings

1. Why is there no big crater under the lunar module caused by the air flow ejected from the braking rocket?

Because when the lunar module descended to the moon, the airflow ejected by the brake rocket spread over a large area, and there was no obvious "big crater".

2. Why are there no stars in the background of the moon landing photos? Were the Apollo moon landing photos forged in the studio?

⑴ This is related to the exposure time. In order to make the close-up shot very clear, the exposure time of the camera must be very short, so that the distant view cannot be seen clearly; if you want to take pictures of stars, the exposure time of the camera must be very long. , but this will cause the nearby scenery in the photo to be completely white, making the photo meaningless.

⑵ If you want to fake moon landing photos in a studio, the studio must have an area of ??5,000 square meters, and more than one scene must be built. And it is very difficult to "fake" the sun, because sunlight is a point light source with high intensity and cannot be faked with existing technology.

3. Since the brake rocket ejected airflow and blew away the moon dust during the moon landing, why are there still footprints left?

Because there is no air on the moon, there is no wind. The surface of the moon has accumulated dust for billions of years. The air flow ejected by the brake rocket cannot blow away all the dust, so the brake rocket ejects If the air current blows away some of the moondust, it can still leave footprints.

4. Why do the shadows in some photos face two directions?

Because the moon's surface is undulating, the shadow cast on the moon is bent and deformed. When seen from a distance, the shadow faces in two directions.

5. The "atmospheric" pressure of the moon is 10 minus 12 millimeters of mercury. If so, why does the American flag on the moon flutter?

There is a horizontal pole at the top of the American flag, so the flag can be propped up. Scientists were very troubled in order to carry this plastic flag. Later, they came up with a way: sandwich the plastic flag in a ladder. Therefore, this plastic flag became wrinkled after being brought to the moon. Coupled with the elastic swing of the aluminum flagpole, it looked like it was fluttering due to wind from a distance.

6. The astronaut was in the shadow of the lunar module when he descended the ladder. Why can he clearly see the astronaut’s feet on the ladder? (It stands to reason that the astronaut’s position is in the shade)

Because the astronaut in the photo is Aldrin, and the person who took the photo is Armstrong, who had already landed on the moon at that time.

1. There are only two astronauts landing on the moon. Why can we see these two astronauts at the same time in the photo? Who took this photo?

This photo was taken by a camera outside the lunar module.

2. How were the moon landing images recorded? How can the camera work properly when the temperature difference on the moon is so huge? (You must know that the camera can only work at temperatures above minus 30 degrees Celsius)

The landing site of Apollo 11 is located at the junction of yin and yang. This can be seen from the long shadow. The temperature at this location is not It is neither high nor low. The temperature is within the normal working range of the camera. Moreover, the temperature is even lower at the South Pole and North Pole on the earth. The camera can work normally in such an environment, let alone on the special location of the moon. .

3. Why was the Saturn V launch vehicle abandoned after the Apollo moon landing, without even leaving any drawings?

The thrust of the first stage of the "Saturn V" launch vehicle reached 3,469 tons. NASA's explanation is that the cost of the "Saturn V" launch vehicle is too high. However, NASA's explanation still doesn't work. Since the cost is too high, why did the United States build 17 "Saturn V" launch vehicles in one go from 1969 to 1972? A currently accepted explanation is that the cost of the Saturn V launch vehicle is too high. Using a rocket with a thrust of several thousand tons to launch hundreds or even dozens of tons of payload is overkill and wasteful. Many technologies of the Saturn V launch vehicle have been applied to current space rockets. The design of the Saturn V launch vehicle is also unreasonable. Some technologies are far behind, so there is no need to continue. Use the Saturn V launch vehicle.

4. The moon’s gravity is only 1/6 of the earth’s. It stands to reason that astronauts should jump farther, but in the documentary, the astronauts’ jump is only 3-4 inches, less than 1 meter. Far away, and after the documentary is accelerated 2.5 times, it looks very similar to what was shot on Earth. What is the explanation for this?

On the earth, the lunar landing suit weighs more than 100 kilograms. It is designed based on human actions in a weightless state. It is difficult to bend the hands and feet. On the moon, although the moon's gravity is only 1/6 of the earth's, The lunar landing suit weighs more than 20 kilograms, making it particularly difficult for astronauts to move. On the earth, the dust raised by the rover is scattered in all directions. On the moon, due to the small gravity, the dust raised by the lunar rover falls in a parabolic trajectory. This can be seen from the documentary. If you want to fake such a scene, you would have to create a large area of ??weightlessness on the earth, which is unrealistic.

5. The lunar module of the Apollo 11 spacecraft consumed a lot of fuel during its journey to the moon. Why was there still enough fuel to return to the earth?

The gravity of the moon is only 1/6 of the earth, the escape velocity is only 1.63km/s, and it requires less fuel; there is air on the earth, and the air creates resistance during the rocket's ascent, which accelerates the rocket's speed. It is very slow. There is no air on the moon, and the rocket speed can be quickly increased to 1.63km/s, requiring less fuel. So although the Apollo 11 spacecraft's lunar module consumed a lot of fuel on its journey to the moon, it could still return to Earth.