Haha, after reading your comments on the 60d lens 18-200, I want to ask if you really know anything about cameras. Ha ha, ha ha ha.

For your question, I am thinking about whether I can understand it and whether it can be adopted.

18-200 Even the lens with large zoom ratio is poor. Sigma 18-250 and Longteng 18-270 at the same price are better than Canon 18-200, and the zoom ratio is larger. Sima's 18-200 is similar to Canon's 18-200, but the price is obviously cheaper. 18-200 is not as good as 18-55, which is only one-eighth of its price, in terms of wide-angle distortion and resolution, and there is a much more reliable 15-85 at the same price. If this lens is not bad enough, I don't know what is bad. Can you find two or three lenses whose imaging ratio is worse than 18-200 among the existing EF/EFS lenses?

Of course, I'm just stating the fact that the cost performance of this lens is extremely low. The money is your own, and you can get it if you are willing to spend 5 thousand yuan on a piece of junk. If you can still have the illusion that you know a lot about cameras, it is simply earned. Congratulations.

Since you have clicked my "Help" and questioned whether I know anything about cameras, I wonder what you can tell me? Im really looking forward to it. If I can only laugh a few times, it is to remind you not to choke to death. I am honored to bring some joy to your life.