Meng Jiaxin's album cover is half-naked and suspected of plagiarism. Can you accept such a large-scale cover being spit out?

Am I old, or is this beautiful side? I'm sorry for copying foreign works on the cover of the new song. He said that he would spare no effort to communicate with the relevant personnel who created the original work, personally apologize to the other party, and participate in the compensation plan. The model in the plagiarized picture said that although her email address was leaked, the Meng Jia team did not contact her and the photographer. Two hours later, she sent another message saying that she had received the email.

I don't know the professional definition of plagiarism, but it looks like the naked eye. I felt a little uncomfortable when I saw this cover. Sent the same question as the questioner. I thought it was because my aesthetics were too old. At that time, I went to Zhihu to see our views, but the topic of grades had not been discussed. I just saw a hot search and found that it was suspected of plagiarism, and the studio was sorry and so on. In the afternoon, Meng Jia Weibo's head was still this half-naked photo, and as a result, he quietly changed another head at night.

Let's not discuss whether it is appropriate to use such a cover when releasing an album for the time being. Later, when I saw the original, I fully understood the reason why I felt uncomfortable. This photo of Meng Jia didn't capture the original artistic conception at all. This photo doesn't make me feel any discomfort, but it makes me happy to explore something conveyed in it.

The use and color of the whole light in the original work are very simple, that is, natural light gives people a clean and fresh feeling, while the sunshine in front of the model conveys some feelings of hope and light. But the most important thing is that although the model's figure is beautiful, this photo makes people forget to peek at the body and let people explore the model's eyes, expressions and psychology. First of all, let's look at the movements, which are very natural and stretching, and there is no feeling of wriggling.

It makes people look very comfortable. But the vision is more worth exploring. Her eyes have a faint sadness, a faint alienation, giving people a feeling of alienation. What is she thinking? What is she thinking? If we only look at facial expressions, she reminds me of the feeling that the heroine has brains, wraps her arms around herself and looks at the distance.

However, this photo of Meng Jia gives me only a light yellow color, even the direction of the sunlight is the same, but this yellow light gives people an ambiguous feeling, with a few words on the background, which is not so clean. Moreover, her eyes are fixed on the place not far from her feet, and she can't tell whether she is arrogant or afraid to face the eyes and scrutiny of others.

She also hugs herself and covers some parts, but the stretching is not enough, giving people a special part that they want to show to each other, but at the same time, they have to maintain that they can't fully see it. The original gives me the feeling that I can be sad and alienated, but I am proud, I am safe, and I am not afraid of your scrutiny. But Meng Jia didn't give it to me.

?

I think someone described it aptly. This photo is like the feeling of being suddenly seen covering a special part of your body while taking a shower. Just look at the face, the feeling above the waist uses the body to attract your attention to me and what I do, but the purpose is not the body. A short feeling of being stretched.

Finally, I would like to say that I don't agree with the statement that Meng Jia's team won attention in this way. This kind of thing happened more than once before, and there was a similar incident on the cover of Joker Xue and Jackson Yi's album or single. However, most of them have not caused such a big dynamic as this one, which may also be related to this bold painting style. But in essence, it is still a question of intellectual property rights. Whether it is the photographer's idea or the actor team's own disregard for the law. After all, it is a big talk when it is spread, and it is a stain when it is strictly pointed out.

?

I believe that for most musicians, music works are like their children. Who will take the initiative to get attention through "plagiarism"? It's not that negative marketing doesn't exist, but it doesn't mean that everyone has no bottom line. In fact, the only thing that needs attention is that in the Internet age, the world is flat, plagiarism can hardly escape the eyes of the audience, and respect for intellectual property rights is also respect.