Hello, teacher, how to choose Canon EOS M6 and Fuji XT20 directly? Where's the camera?

1 and Canon EOSM6 are actually simplified versions of EOSM5 (but such naming will make many people mistakenly think that M6 is an upgraded version of M5). Remove the built-in viewfinder, the body material is lighter, and there are more choices for silver body. The core components are the same as EOSM5, while XT20 is a simplified version of XT2, which is mainly less professional grade of 1/8000 seconds than XT2.

It's really hard to choose between these two devices because they have their own advantages and disadvantages. Let me talk about the advantages and disadvantages of these two cameras respectively. Limited by space, I will only talk about the core part, that is, the sensor, lens, processor and control elements of the camera.

A, as far as the sensor is concerned, M6 adopts the usual MSK sensor (there are three kinds of sensors in mainstream digital cameras at present, one is the traditional MSK sensor, which is divided into direct-down, back-illuminated, stacked and so on. , and M6 adopts direct type; The second type is X3 sensor patented by Kodak Technology Sigma, the third type is X-Tran sensor with disordered arrangement of silver salts in RGB imitation film, and XT20 uses X-Tran CMOS. Theoretically speaking, Fuji's X-Tran sensor technology is more advanced, which does not produce pseudo color and Moire fringes, and does not need a low-pass filter (a kind of timely crystal plate), so the resolution is high. However, whether the sensor needs low pass is controversial in the industry. Zheng Fang thinks that low-pass can ensure the imaging color, and the resolution of phase difference is basically indistinguishable in actual shooting, especially after removing low-pass, moire fringes may still appear in a very short environment; The opponent thinks that removing the low-pass can improve the imaging resolution, and the resolution is a hard index, and a few moire fringes can be supplemented and corrected in the later stage, so there is no conclusion, so now Sony, Pentax and other high-end models have set up the adjustment function of low-pass in the machine, which is left to users to decide for themselves. On the other hand, Canon M6 has a low-pass filter, and there is no internal adjustment of two-way selection function. Personally, I agree with the opposing party that the hard index of resolution cannot be compensated later. Due to the different technologies of Fuji X-Tran sensors, the most authoritative third-party sensor evaluation institution in the world, French DxO Mark Laboratory, has not evaluated them (including X3 sensors, and DxO has only evaluated ordinary Fuji sensors, such as Fuji X 100), so the quality of M6 and XT20 sensors lacks objective quantitative evaluation standards. However, judging from DXO's evaluation of M5 (total score 77, color depth 23.4, dynamic 12.4, high sensitivity 1262, M6 and M5 are the same sensor), it is above average and not ahead of time, so I personally think that Fuji's X-Tran sensor is better than Canon's M6 sensor (this is subjective and not necessarily correct).

B, about the lens. The lens has a greater influence on imaging than the sensor, so it is the most important. Canon's M-series lens is not good, at least it lacks famous lenses, but it is not very bad. At least Bisogni's civilian lens is kind and worthy of this price. Because the advantage of Canon M series is that it can use all Canon's SLR lenses through the adapter ring (Sony can also turn), and Canon's SLR lenses are very powerful, especially Canon's red circle lenses, with very good quality and picture quality. Relatively speaking, Fuji's lens group is obviously less than Canon SLR lens. However, Fuji's micro-single lenses (not counting medium format lenses) are all tailored for micro-single lenses, which are relatively portable, while Canon SLR lenses are all tailored for Quan Huafu SLR lenses, which are relatively large. For example, a lens with the same equivalent focal length of 35 people costs 5000+ for Fuji 23F 1.4R, which is very portable, and 7000+ for Canon Red Circle 24F 1.4. Although the image quality is better, it is larger. Coupled with the length of the adapter ring, the portability of the micro-single is almost a cinch. Therefore, the original lens of Canon M is not as good as Fuji's, but the switched SLR lens is better than Fuji's. On the whole, Canon's SLR lens is of better quality, and Fuji's micro-single lens is more portable. How to choose, everyone's standards are different;

C. About the processor. The image processor is mainly related to the quality of converting electrical signals into electronic documents, including color and noise control. Generally speaking, Canon's processor technology is better, at least M series adopts 14bits' RAW lossless compression, and Fuji adopts 12bits' RAW lossless compression, which has certain influence in the later period. As far as the quality of direct delivery is concerned, it is controversial. Professionals generally believe that Canon's straight-out quality is higher than Fuji's. The reason is that Canon's color reproduction is more accurate, with less smear and more reserved details. However, the gap between canon's RAW and JPG is obvious, and it is not reconciled in the later stage; However, it is generally believed that Fuji's direct image quality is higher than Canon's because Fuji's colors are more eye-catching, more comfortable and better-looking, and night shooting also has a better sense of image fluency. The gap between JPGH and RAW is very small, and the difference between doing and not doing is not very big, which is very worry-free. As for Fuji's film mode, it's very convenient and useful for people who don't like the later period, but it's just chicken ribs for those who will be late, and it's of little use. How to choose, everyone's standards are different;

D, about manipulation. The controls of M6 and XT20 are at the same level, and there is basically no obvious difference. Although Canon's full-pixel dual-core AF is more advanced than the hybrid AF integrating phase difference and contrast in theory, Canon's dual-core AF technology is not fully mature, at least not to the extreme. In fact, the hybrid AF is faster than the dual-core AF, but there is basically no difference in real shooting (the difference is only 0.0X second), and the precision of the dual-core AF is higher than that of the hybrid AF, although the difference is difficult to perceive.

3. The landlord said in his question that there are certain requirements for portability, so the scheme of converting M6 to SLR lens is ruled out, otherwise it will not be portable. Under this premise, Fuji XT20 is more worthy of recommendation. First, Fuji has a more portable and high-quality lens (Canon M's original lens is much worse, although Fuji lens is more expensive, but the landlord said that the budget is not limited); Second, Fuji's film mode is more practical and convenient (Canon needs later stage); Third, Fuji's face value is higher (Canon can't match it at all). As for lens recommendation, Fuji XF16-55F2.8 is recommended for one camera and one mirror; If one machine has two mirrors, xf18-55+xf 56f1.2r is recommended; If one machine has multiple mirrors, xf23f1.4r is recommended for humanities or food; XF56F 1.2R is used for portraits or food; XF 10-24F4R is used for scenery; XF 100-400 is used for telephoto.